Advertisement

Protecting air transportation: a survey of operations research applications to aviation security

  • Adrian J. Lee
  • Alexander G. Nikolaev
  • Sheldon H. Jacobson
Article

Abstract

Catastrophic events often illustrate a nation’s preparedness in anticipating and preventing the extreme consequences of an intentional malicious attack. When terrorists hijacked four commercial aircraft for use as guided missiles against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, the world’s population became aware of the human potential to inflict destruction and harm, and the vulnerability of transportation systems against preventing the occurrence of similar disasters. Through research, simulation, and system analysis, procedures may be formulated that limit or eradicate the possibility of future occurrences. Operations research encompasses the optimal allocation of resources subject to constraints, as well as providing techniques that evaluate the performance of security policies. This article provides a survey of operations research activities directed toward analyzing and enhancing the aviation security system, with the intent to be informative and motivate the continual improvement of our nation’s transportation security.

Keywords

Operations research Aviation security System analysis Modeling Optimization Simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant No. FA9550-07-1-0232. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Government, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

References

  1. Attagara J (2006) The Explosive Scanning Devices Allocation Problem for Airport Security Systems. PhD dissertation. Texas Tech UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Babu VLL, Batta R, Lin L (2004) Passenger grouping under constant threat probability in an airport security system. Eur J Oper Res 168:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett A (2001) The worst day ever. OR/MS Today 28(6):28–31Google Scholar
  4. Barnett A (2003) Trust no one at the airport. OR/MS Today 30(1):72Google Scholar
  5. Barnett A (2004) CAPPS II: the foundation of aviation security. Risk Anal 24:909–916, doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00489.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett A, Shumsky RW, Hansen M, Odoni A, Gosling G (2001) Safe at home? An experiment in domestic airline security. Oper Res 49:181–195Google Scholar
  7. Butler V, Poole RW Jr (2002) Rethinking checked-baggage screening. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California. Policy Study No. 297Google Scholar
  8. Candalino TJ, Kobza JE, Jacobson SH (2004) Designing optimal aviation baggage screening systems using simulated annealing. Comput Oper Res 31(10):1753–1767, doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00118-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caulkins JP (2004) CAPPS II: a risky choice concerning an untested risk detection technology. Risk Anal 24(4):921–924, doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00491.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakrabarti S, Strauss A (2002) Carnival booth: an algorithm for defeating the computer-aided passenger screening system. First Monday 7(10). http://www.firstmonday.org. Accessed May 15, 2008
  11. Donovan S, Mahoney T, Pelletier N, Schmidt M, Kwinn M (2003) A systems approach to John Wayne Airport Security. Proc of the 2003 IEEE Syst and Inf Eng Des Symp 221–224Google Scholar
  12. Dugan L, Lafree G, Piquero AR (2005) Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Criminol 43(4):1031–1065, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00032.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enoma A, Allen S (2007) Developing key performance indicators for airport safety and security. Facil 25(7/8):296–315, doi: 10.1108/02632770710753334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng Q (2007) On determining specifications and selections of alternative technologies for airport checked-baggage security screening. Risk Anal 27(5):1299–1310Google Scholar
  15. Glässer U, Rastkar S, Vajihollahi M (2006) Computational modeling and experimental validation of aviation security procedures. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3975:420–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haimes YY (2002) Roadmap for modeling risks of terrorism to the homeland. J Infrastruct Syst 8(2):35–41, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(35) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall M, DeLollis B (2004) Plan to collect flier data canceled. USA Today 14 Jul 2004 http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-07-14-fly-plan_x.htm Accessed 15 May 2008
  18. Jacobson SH, Kobza JE, Nakayama MK (2000) A sampling procedure to estimate risk probabilities in access control security systems. Eur J Oper Res 122(1):123–132, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00047-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobson SH, Bowman JM, Kobza JE (2001a) Modeling and analyzing the performance of aviation security systems using baggage value performance measures. IMA J Manage Math 12(1):3–22, doi: 10.1093/imaman/12.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobson SH, Kobza JE, Easterling AE (2001b) A detection theoretic approach to modeling aviation security problems using the knapsack problem. IIE Trans 33(9):747–759Google Scholar
  21. Jacobson SH, Virta JE, Bowman JM, Kobza JE, Nestor JJ (2003) Modeling aviation baggage screening security systems: a case study. IIE Trans 35(3):259–269, doi: 10.1080/07408170304372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobson SH, Karnani T, Kobza JE (2005a) Assessing the impact of deterrence on aviation checked baggage screening strategies. Int J Risk Assess Manage 5(1):1–15, doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2005.006608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobson SH, McLay LA, Virta JL, Kobza JE (2005b) Integer program models for the deployment of airport baggage screening security devices. Optim Eng 6(3):339–359, doi: 10.1007/s11081-005-1743-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobson SH, McLay LA, Kobza JE, Bowman JM (2005c) Modeling and analyzing multiple station baggage screening security system performance. Nav Res Logist 52(1):30–45, doi: 10.1002/nav.20052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobson SH, Karnani T, Kobza JE, Ritchie L (2006) A cost–benefit analysis of alternative device configurations for aviation checked baggage security screening. Risk Anal 26(2):297–310, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00736.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kobza JE, Jacobson SH (1996) Addressing the dependency problem in access security system architecture design. Risk Anal 16(6):801–812, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00831.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kobza JE, Jacobson SH (1997) Probability models for access security system architectures. J Oper Res Soc 48(3):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazarick RT (1999a) Airport vulnerability assessment—an analytical approach. Proc SPIE 3575:302–310, doi: 10.1117/12.334999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lazarick RT (1999b) Airport vulnerability assessment—a methodology evaluation. IEEE 33rd Annu 1999 Int Carnahan Conf on Secur Technol 120–133Google Scholar
  30. Martonosi SE, Barnett A (2006) How effective is security screening of airline passengers. Interfaces 36(6):545–552, doi: 10.1287/inte.1060.0231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McLay LA, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2005) Making skies safer. OR/MS Today 32(5):24–31Google Scholar
  32. McLay LA, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2006) A multilevel passenger screening problem for aviation security. Nav Res Logist 53(3):183–197, doi: 10.1002/nav.20131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McLay LA, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2007) Integer programming models and analysis for a multilevel passenger screening problem. IIE Trans 39(1):73–81, doi: 10.1080/07408170600729200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McLay LA, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2008) The tradeoff between technology and prescreening intelligence in checked baggage screening for aviation security. Journal of Transportation Security 1(2):107–126Google Scholar
  35. McLay LA, Nikolaev AG, Jacobson SH (2009) A sequential stochastic passenger screening problem for aviation security. IIE Trans (to appear)Google Scholar
  36. Nie X, Batta R, Drury CG, Lin L (2008) Passenger grouping with risk levels in an airport security system. Eur J Oper Res (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.027
  37. Nikolaev AG, Jacobson SH, McLay LA (2007) A sequential stochastic security system design problem for aviation security. Transport Sci 41(2):182–194, doi: 10.1287/trsc.1070.0198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Official Airline Guide (1998) OAG business travel planner. Bedfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Pacheco LJ, Kobza JE, Jacobson SH (2004) Modeling and analyzing terrorist behavior within the aviation security environment. IIE Annu 2004 Conf and Exhib 373Google Scholar
  40. Peterson RM, Bittel RH, Forgie CA, Lee WH, Nestor JJ (2007) Using USCAP’s analytical models, the transportation security administration balances the impacts of aviation security policies on passengers and airlines. Interfaces 37(1):52–67, doi: 10.1287/inte.1060.0274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poole RW Jr (2006) Airport security: time for a new model. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California. Policy Study No. 340Google Scholar
  42. Tosic V (1992) A review of airport passenger terminal operations analysis and modeling. Transp Res 26A(1):3–26Google Scholar
  43. Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2006) TSA announces key elements of Registered Traveler Program. Press release 20 Jan 2006 http://www.tsa.gov/press/releases/2006/press_release_0645.shtm Accessed 15 May 2008
  44. United States Government Accountability Office (2003) Progress since September 11, 2001, and the challenges ahead. GAO-03-1150T. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  45. United States Government Accountability Office (2004) Challenges exist in stabilizing and enhancing passenger and baggage screening operations. GAO-04-440T. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Veatch JD, James JW, May TT, Wood TM, Kruse EM (1999) Airport vulnerability assessment methodology. IEEE 33rd Annu 1999 Int Carnahan Conf on Secur Technol 134–151Google Scholar
  47. Virta JE, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2002) Outgoing selectee rates at hub airports. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 76(2):155–165, doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00004-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Virta JE, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2003) Analyzing the cost of screening selectee and non-selectee baggage. Risk Anal 23(5):897–908, doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security (1998) The DOT Status Rep http://www.dot.gov/affairs/whcoasas.htm Accessed 15 May 2008
  50. Wilson DL (2005) Use of modeling and simulation to support airport security. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag 20(8):3–6, doi: 10.1109/MAES.2005.1499286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson DL, Roe EK, So SA (2006) Security Checkpoint Optimizer (SCO): an application for simulating the operations of airport security checkpoints. Proc of the 38th Conf Winter Simul 529–535Google Scholar
  52. Wright PD, Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL (2006) A survey of operations research models and applications in homeland security. Interfaces 36(6):514–529, doi: 10.1287/inte.1060.0253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yoo KE, Choi YC (2006) Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative performance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports. J Air Transp Manage 12(12):135–142 doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian J. Lee
    • 1
  • Alexander G. Nikolaev
    • 2
  • Sheldon H. Jacobson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana–ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial & Enterprise Systems EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana–ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana–ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations