A private universal voucher program’s effects on traditional public schools
Article
First Online:
- 429 Downloads
Abstract
K-12 education reformers have often cited increases in spending with little noticeable gain in test scores, coupled with the fact that American students lag behind their foreign peers on standardized tests, as a major policy problem. School choice, specifically voucher programs, have emerged as a possible solution to the K-12 education woes. This article focuses on what is commonly referred to as the “systemic effects” of a private voucher program in the Edgewood Independent School District (EISD) in San Antonio, Texas. Using carefully chosen control districts and a robust econometric analysis, we conclude that the CEO Horizon Scholarship Program had small, positive effects on the traditional public schools of EISD. The rate of change growth, however, does slow as the voucher program nears the end of its term indicating that traditional public school participants need to believe that these programs are long term.
Keywords
K-12 education School choice VoucherNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank R. Peter Terrebonne for his help with the econometric analysis. His input and insight was invaluable.
References
- Bettinger E (2005) The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Econ Educ Rev 24(2):133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bifulco R, Ladd HF (2006) The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: evidence from North Carolina. Educ Financ Policy 1(1):50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bohte J (2004) Examining the impact of charter schools on performance in traditional public schools. Policy Stud J 32(4):501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Booker K, Gilpatric S, Gronberg T, Jansen D (2008) The effect of charter schools on traditional public school students in Texas: are children who stay behind left behind? J Urban Econ 64:123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW (1987) Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model. In: Bock RD (ed) Multilevel statistical methods in educational research. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Buddin R, Zimmer R (2005) Student achievement in charter schools: a complex pictures. J Policy Anal Manag 24(2):351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carr M, Ritter G (2007) Measuring the competitive effect of charter schools on student achievement in Ohio’s traditional public schools (Research Publication No. 146). National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Diamond JW (2007) Should Texas adopt a school choice program? An evaluation of the Horizon scholarship program in San Antonio. Texas Public Policy Foundation, AustinGoogle Scholar
- Gray NL (2012) The effects of the Ohio charter school policy on traditional public school achievement. Cato J 32(3):557–579Google Scholar
- Greene JP, Hall D (2001) The CEO horizon scholarship program: a case study of school vouchers in the Edgewood independent school district, San Antonio. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
- Greene JP, Forster G (2002) Rising to the challenge: the effect of school choice on public schools in Milwaukee and San Antonio (Civic Bulletin No. 27). Manhattan Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hanushek EA (2003) The failure of input-based schooling policies. Econ J 113:F64–F98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hausman J (2001) Mismeasured variables in econometric analysis: problems from the right and problems from the left. J Econ Perspect 15(4):57–67Google Scholar
- Holmes GM, DeSimone J and Rupp NG (2003) Does school choice increase school quality? Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
- Hoxby CM (2004) Productivity in education: the quintessential upstream industry. South Econ J 71(2):209–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoxby CM (2001) How school choice affects the achievement of public school students (Meeting. Hoover Institution, Stanford, CA: Koret task forceGoogle Scholar
- Hoxby CM and Rockoff JE (2004) The impact of charter schools on student achievement. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
- Imberman SA (2009) The effect of charter schools on achievement and behavior of public school students. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
- Kmenta J (1986) Elements of Econometrics, 2nd edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Management study of the Edgewood independent school district (1999) Austin, TX: MGT of America, IncGoogle Scholar
- McKinsey and Company (2009) The economic impact of the achievement gap in America’s schoolsGoogle Scholar
- Merrifield JD (2004) The Edgewood voucher program: some preliminary findings. Cato J 23(3):447–462Google Scholar
- Ni Y (2007) Do traditional public schools benefit from charter school competition? Evidence from Michigan (Research Publication No. 145). National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sass TR (2006) Charter schools and student achievement in Florida. Educ Financ Policy 1(1):91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S Department of Education (2008) A nation accountable: twenty-five years after a ‘Nation at Risk’Google Scholar
- Wooldridge J (2003) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 2eth edn. South-Western, MasonGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014