Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 335–350 | Cite as

A panel data analysis for housing affordability in Taiwan

  • I-Chun TsaiEmail author
  • Chien-Wen Peng


Although the equilibrium relationship between household income and house price is well documented in previous theoretical studies, the empirical results are usually unfavorable. This article examines whether a long-term relationship between house price and income exists through a panel integration and cointegration methodology in analyzing data from four cities in Taiwan from 1980 to 2007. The findings support the existence of a long-term equilibrium relationship between income and house price, which indicate that housing affordability in Taiwan is stable. After controlling other variables, the income elasticity of house prices on average is close to one. Furthermore, evidence points to a bi-directional causality between income and house price.


House Price Income Housing Affordability Panel Cointegration 

JEL Classification




Funding from the National Science Council of Taiwan under Project No. NSC 97-2410-H-390-020 has enabled the continuation of this research and the dissemination of these results.


  1. Bourassa SC (1996) Measuring the affordability of homeownership. Urban Stud 33(10):1867–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowden RJ (1980) Equilibrium and disequilibrium in the housing market; a survey, Housing Economics, paper prepared for the National Housing Economics Conference 1978, Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS)Google Scholar
  3. Bramely G (1994) An affordability crisis in British housing: dimensions, causes and policy impact. Hous Stud 9(1):103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, advances in econometrics, vol 15. Amsterdam, JAI, pp 161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Case KE, Shiller R (2003) Is there a bubble in the housing market? Brookings Pap Econ Act 2:299–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake L (1993) Modelling UK house prices using cointegration: an application of the Johansen technique. Appl Econ 25:1225–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallin J (2006) The long-run relationship between house prices and income: evidence from local housing markets. Real Estate Econ 34:417–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gan Q, Hill RJ (2009) Measuring housing affordability: looking beyond the median. J Hous Econ 18:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giussani B, Hadjimatheou G (1991) Modelling regional house price in United Kingdom. J Reg Sci Assoc Int 70(2):201–219Google Scholar
  11. Holly S, Jones N (1997) House prices since the 1940s: cointegration, demography and asymmetries. Econ Model 14(4):549–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurlin C (2004) A simple test of the non causality assumption in a heterogeneous panel model. Rev Écon 56:3Google Scholar
  13. Hurlin C, Venet B (2004) Financial development and growth: a re-examination using a panel granger causality test, Document de Recherche du LEO; No. 2004-18Google Scholar
  14. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom Elsevier 115(1):53–74Google Scholar
  15. Kau KW, Chang CO, Lin V (2000) An analysis of reasonable housing prices in Taipei from demand side, 9th Annual Conference Housing Study (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CS (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malpezzi S (1990) Urban housing and financial markets: some international comparisons. Urban Stud 27(6):971–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCarthy J, Peach R (2004) Are home prices the next bubble? Fed Reserve Bank NY Econ Policy Rev 10:1–17Google Scholar
  19. Memery C (2001) The housing system and the celtic tiger: the state response to a housing crisis of affordability and access. Eur J Hous Policy 1(1):79–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mikhed V, Zemčík P (2007) Do House Prices Reflect Fundamentals? Aggregate and Panel Data Evidence, Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  21. >Mikhed V, Zemčík P (2009) Testing for bubbles in housing markets: a panel data approach. J Real Estate Finance Econ 38(4):366–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muellbauer J, Murphy A (2008) Housing markets and the economy: the assessment. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pedroni P (1999) Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat (Special Issue) 61:653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 20:597–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitehead C (1974) A model of the UK housing market. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 33(44):245–266Google Scholar
  26. Yamada Y (1999) Affordability crises in housing in Britain and Japan. Hous Stud 14(1):99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceNational University of KaohsiungKaohsiungRepublic of China
  2. 2.Department of Real Estate & Built EnvironmentNational Taipei UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations