Advertisement

A new concept for verifying the isocentric alignment of the proton-rotational gantry for radiation control

  • Takahiro KatoEmail author
  • Yuhei Yamazaki
  • Tatsuhiko Sagara
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to introduce the modified Winston–Lutz (mWL) test and to evaluate its feasibility. This is a new method to completely absorb the proton beam around the isocenter inside a phantom for radiation control. The mWL test was performed using a 14-cm-diameter acrylic Lucy 3D QA Phantom for a passive-scattering proton beam gantry. The energy of the unmodulated proton beam was adjusted such that the residual range was < 130 mm, and the energy of the proton beam was completely lost around the isocenter. The radiation field was formed with a multi-leaf collimator at 8.6 × 8.6 mm2 in the isocenter plane. The phantom was loaded with a 4-mm-diameter tungsten ball, and the EBT3 was set up at the isocenter. The proton beam was irradiated at gantry angles with 45° steps, and the isocenter deviation of the proton beam was measured and subsequently analyzed. Although the radiation field penumbra was blurred under the influence of scattered radiation due to placement in the phantom compared to the traditional WL test placed in the air, evaluation of the beam axis accuracy was possible. The results confirmed that the maximum total displacement was less than 0.9 mm, and the specifications of the device were met. The mWL test is feasible and effective to reduce the building activation in proton beam treatment facilities. Thus, it can be considered a useful method that sufficiently satisfies the shielding calculation conditions.

Keywords

Proton beam Radiation control Rotational gantry Winston–lutz test 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies performed with human participants or animals.

References

  1. 1.
    Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, Serago C, Aguirre F, Ma L, Arjomandy B, Liu C, Sandin C, Holmes T; Task Group 142, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4197–212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moyers MF, Lesyna W. Isocenter characteristics of an external ring proton gantry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(5):1622–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barkhof J, Schut G, Flanz JB, Goitein M, Schippers JM. Verification of the alignment of a therapeutic radiation beam relative to its patient positioner. Med Phys. 1999;26(11):2429–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciangaru G, Yang JN, Oliver PJ, Bues M, Zhu M, Nakagawa F, Chiba H, Nakamura S, Yoshino H, Umezawa M, Smith AR. Verification procedure for isocentric alignment of proton beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007;8(4):2671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuse H, Sakae T, Terunuma T, Sato M, Aoki S. An isocenter detection and verification device for use in proton therapy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2012;83(12):125109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansen P, Hu D. An isocenter estimation tool for proton gantry alignment. Rev. Sc.i Instrum. 2017;88(12):125102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lutz W, Winston KR, Maleki N. A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1988;14(2):373–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Du W, Johnson JL, Jiang W, Kudchadker RJ. On the selection of gantry and collimator angles for isocenter localization using Winston–Lutz tests. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2016;17(1):167–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cadini F, Bolst D, Guatelli S, Beltran C, Jackson M, Rosenfeld AB. Neutron shielding for a new projected proton therapy facility: a Geant4 simulation study. Phys Med. 2016;32(12):1862–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakurai H, Ishikawa H, Okumura T. Proton beam therapy in Japan: current and future status. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;46(10):885–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith A, Gillin M, Bues M, Zhu XR, Suzuki K, Mohan R, Woo S, Lee A, Komaki R, Cox J, Hiramoto K, Akiyama H, Ishida T, Sasaki T, Matsuda K. The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system. Med Phys. 2009;36(9): 4068–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang N, Ghebremedhin A, Patyal B. Commissioning of a proton gantry equipped with dual X-ray imagers and a robotic patient positioner, and evaluation of the accuracy of single-beam image registration for this system. Med. Phys. 2015;42(6):2979–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pidikiti R, Patel BC, Maynard MR, Dugas JP, Syh J, Sahoo N, Wu HT, Rosen LR. Commissioning of the world's first compact pencil-beam scanning proton therapy system. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2018;19(1):94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Preparing Section for New Faculty of Medical ScienceFukushima Medical UniversityFukushima CityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Radiation Physics and TechnologyKoriyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations