Advertisement

Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 375–381 | Cite as

Influence of magnesium chloride on the dose–response of polyacrylamide-type gel dosimeters

  • Shin-ichiro Hayashi
  • Hiraku Kawamura
  • Shuji Usui
  • Takahiro Tominaga
Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

We investigated the effect of magnesium chloride (MgCl2) on the nuclear magnetic resonance dose–response of polyacrylamide-type (PAGAT, NIPAM, and VIPET) gel dosimeters containing acrylamide, N-isopropylacrylamide, and N-vinylpyrrolidone as a monomer, respectively. The dose-transverse relaxation rates (1/T2 = R2) obtained from magnetic resonance imaging data revealed that a substantial increase in the dose–R2 response occurred as the concentration of MgCl2 in the gel dosimeters increased. The sensitivity of the PAGAT gel with 1.0 M MgCl2 was found to be approximately one order higher than that of the same gel without MgCl2. In addition, the water equivalences of the gels with MgCl2 were evaluated over a wide range of photon energies. The results indicated that MgCl2 acts as a powerful sensitizer to radiation-induced free-radical polymerization in polyacrylamide-type gel dosimeters, but does not interfere with the desirable properties of basic polyacrylamide-type gel dosimeters (i.e., the dose rate and dose integration).

Keywords

Polymer gel dosimeter PAGAT NIPAM VIPET Magnesium chloride Radiotherapy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies performed with human or animal participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Ibbott GS. Clinical applications of gel dosimeters. J Phys Conf Ser. 2006;56:108–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maryanski MJ, Gore JC, Kennan RP, Schulz RJ. NMR relaxation enhancement in gels polymerized and cross-linked by ionizing radiation: a new approach to 3D dosimetry by MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11:253–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maryanski MJ, Zastavker YZ, Gore JC. Radiation dose distributions in three dimensions from tomographic optical density scanning of polymer gels: II. Optical properties of the BANG polymer gel. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:2705–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hilts M, Audet C, Duzenli C, Jirasek A. Polymer gel dosimetry using X-ray computed tomography: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol. 2000;44:2559–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldock C, De Deene Y, Doran S, Ibbott G, Jirasek A, Lepage M, McAuley KB, Oldham M, Schreiner LJ. Polymer gel dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:R1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Deene Y, Vergote K, Claeys C, De Wagter C. The fundamental radiation properties of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters: a comparison between a methacrylic acid based gel and acrylamide based gels. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:653–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karlsson A, Gustavsson H, Månsson S, McAuley KB, Bäck SÅJ. Dose integration characteristics in normoxic polymer gel dosimetry investigated using sequential beam irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:4697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koeva VI, Olding T, Jirasek A, Schreiner LJ, McAuley KB. Preliminary investigation of the NMR, optical and X-ray CT dose-response of polymer gel dosimeters incorporating cosolvents to improve dose sensitivity. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jirasek A, Hilts M, McAuley KB. Polymer gel dosimeters with enhanced sensitivity for use in X-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:5269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kozicki M, Jaszczak M, Maras P, Dudek M, Cłapa M. On the development of a VIPARnd radiotherapy 3D polymer gel dosimeter. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:986–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chain JNM, Jirasek A, Schreiner LJ, McAuley KB. Cosolvent-free polymer gel dosimeters with improved dose sensitivity and resolution for X-ray CT dose response. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:2091–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayashi S, Fujiwara F, Usui S, Tominaga T. Effect of inorganic salt on the dose sensitivity of polymer gel dosimeter. Radiat Phys Chem. 2012;81:884–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolokolkina NV, Penenzhik MA, Virnik AD, Martynenko AI, Yanovskii YG, Topchiev DA, Kabanov VA. Effect of inorganic salts on reaction rate in high-conversion polymerization of N-trimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate methyl sulphate in aqueous solutions. Polym Sci USSR. 1986;28:166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayashi S, Kawamura H, Usui S, Tominaga T. Comparison of the influence of inorganic salts on the NMR dose sensitivity of polyacrylamide-based gel dosimeter. J Phys Conf Ser. 2013;444:012094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venning AJ, Hill B, Brindha S, Healy BJ, Baldock C. Investigation of the PAGAT polymer gel dosimeter using magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:3875–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senden RJ, De Jean P, McAuley KB, Schreiner LJ. Polymer gel dosimeters with reduced toxicity: a preliminary investigation of the NMR and optical dose–response using different monomers. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:3301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papadakis AE, Maris TG, Zacharopoulou F, Pappas E, Zacharakis G, Damilakis J. An evaluation of the dosimetric performance characteristics of N-vinylpyrrolidone-based polymer gels. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:5069–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pavoni JF, Baffa O. An evaluation of dosimetric characteristics of MAGIC gel modified by adding formaldehyde-MAGIC-f. Radiat Meas. 2012;47:1074–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berger MJ, Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM, Chang J, Coursey JS, Sukumar R, Zucker DS, Olsen K. XCOM: photon cross sections database, web ver. 1.5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg; 2010. http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xcom/index.cfm. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
  20. 20.
    Taylor ML, Smith RL, Dossing F, Franich RD. Robust calculation of effective atomic numbers: the Auto-Z eff software. Med Phys. 2012;39:1769–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Health SciencesHiroshima International UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Radiological SciencesIbaraki Prefectural University of Health SciencesIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations