Advertisement

Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 156–164 | Cite as

Quantitative T1 and T2* carotid atherosclerotic plaque imaging using a three-dimensional multi-echo phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence: a feasibility study

  • Yasuhiro FujiwaraEmail author
  • Hirotoshi Maruyama
  • Kanako Toyomaru
  • Yuri Nishizaka
  • Masahiro Fukamatsu
Article
  • 224 Downloads

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to detect carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Although it is important to evaluate vulnerable carotid plaques containing lipids and intra-plaque hemorrhages (IPHs) using T1-weighted images, the image contrast changes depending on the imaging settings. Moreover, to distinguish between a thrombus and a hemorrhage, it is useful to evaluate the iron content of the plaque using both T1-weighted and T2*-weighted images. Therefore, a quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaques using T1 and T2* values may be necessary for the accurate evaluation of plaque components. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the multi-echo phase-sensitive inversion recovery (mPSIR) sequence can improve T1 contrast while simultaneously providing accurate T1 and T2* values of an IPH. T1 and T2* values measured using mPSIR were compared to values from conventional methods in phantom and in vivo studies. In the phantom study, the T1 and T2* values estimated using mPSIR were linearly correlated with those of conventional methods. In the in vivo study, mPSIR demonstrated higher T1 contrast between the IPH phantom and sternocleidomastoid muscle than the conventional method. Moreover, the T1 and T2* values of the blood vessel wall and sternocleidomastoid muscle estimated using mPSIR were correlated with values measured by conventional methods and with values reported previously. The mPSIR sequence improved T1 contrast while simultaneously providing accurate T1 and T2* values of the neck region. Although further study is required to evaluate the clinical utility, mPSIR may improve carotid atherosclerotic plaque detection and provide detailed information about plaque components.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging Plaque imaging Black-blood imaging Quantification Intra-plaque hemorrhage Quantitative MRI 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This study was supported in part by a research grant from the Policy-Based Medical Services Foundation.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of an institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from each participant included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W, Rosenfeld ME, et al. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:840–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai JM. Classification of Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions With In Vivo Multicontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:1368–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Takaya N, Chu B, Underhill H, Kerwin WS, et al. The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR imaging for characterization and assessment. Radiology. 2007;244:64–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Polissar NL, Jarvik GP, et al. Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation. 2005;111:2768–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Beach KW, Maravilla KR. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR characterization and identification of vulnerable lesions. Radiology. 2001;221:285–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamada N, Higashi M, Otsubo R, Sakuma T, Oyama N, Tanaka R, et al. Association between signal hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR imaging of carotid plaques and ipsilateral ischemic events. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:287–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe Y, Nagayama M. MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery. Neuroradiology. 2010;52:253–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Delay GS, Allder S, et al. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:3047–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato Y, Ogasawara K, Narumi S, Sasaki M, Saito A, Tsushima E, et al. Optimal MR plaque imaging for cervical carotid artery stenosis in predicting the development of microembolic signals during exposure of carotid arteries in endarterectomy: comparison of 4 T1-weighted imaging techniques. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1146–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chu B. Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke. 2004;35:1079–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu DC, Vu AT, Ota H, DeMarco JK. An optimized 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo pulse sequence for hemorrhage assessment using inversion recovery and multiple echoes (3D SHINE) for carotid plaque imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:1341–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:372–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qi H, Sun J, Qiao H, Chen S, Zhou Z, Pan X, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging with quantitative vessel wall T1 mapping: technical development and initial experience. Radiology. 2017;170526–9.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170526.
  15. 15.
    Wang J, Börnert P, Zhao H, Hippe DS, Zhao X, Balu N, et al. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraPlaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:337–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang J, Ferguson MS, Balu N, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Börnert P. Improved carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging using a slab-selective phase-sensitive inversion-recovery (SPI) sequence. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:1332–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu DC, Ferguson MS, DeMarco JK. An optimized 3D inversion recovery prepared fast spoiled gradient recalled sequence for carotid plaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;26:1360–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Warntjes MJ, Kihlberg J, Engvall J. Rapid T1 quantification based on 3D phase sensitive inversion recovery. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fujiwara Y, Maruyama H, Kosaka N, Ishimori Y. Simultaneous acquisition of high-contrast and quantitative liver T 1 images using 3D phase-sensitive inversion recovery: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol. 2016;58:899–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coolen BF, Poot DHJ, Liem MI, Smits LP, Gao S, Kotek G, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative T1 and T2 mapping of the carotid artery: sequence design and in vivo feasibility. Magn Reson Med. 2015;75:1008–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Narumi S, Sasaki M, Ohba H, Ogasawara K, Kobayashi M, Hitomi J, et al. Prediction of carotid plaque characteristics using non-gated MR imaging: correlation with endarterectomy specimens. Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:191–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M, Enomoto Y, Asano T, Hara A, et al. Embolic complications after carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy are associated with tissue characteristics of carotid plaques evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215:399–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, Inoue K, Tabuchi T, Oda K, et al. Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:868–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takemoto K, Ueba T, Takano K, Abe H, Hirata Y, Higashi T, et al. Quantitative evaluation using the plaque/muscle ratio index panels predicts plaque type and risk of embolism in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:1298–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, Cai Y-Q, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, et al. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;240:464–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. London: Elsevier; 2004.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saito A, Sasaki M, Ogasawara K, Kobayashi M, Hitomi J, Narumi S, et al. Carotid plaque signal differences among four kinds of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques: a histopathological correlation study. Neuroradiology. 2012;54:1187–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharkey-Toppen TP, Mihai G, Maiseyeu A, Tran T, Clymer BD, Simonetti OP, et al. Improved in vivo human carotid artery wall T 2* estimation. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31:44–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuhiro Fujiwara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hirotoshi Maruyama
    • 2
  • Kanako Toyomaru
    • 3
  • Yuri Nishizaka
    • 3
  • Masahiro Fukamatsu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Life SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Radiological CenterNational Hospital Organization Kumamoto Saisyunsou HospitalKumamotoJapan
  3. 3.Course of Radiological Science, School of Health SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  4. 4.Radiological CenterNational Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical CenterKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations