Evaluation of the impact of carotid artery bifurcation angle on hemodynamics by use of computational fluid dynamics: a simulation and volunteer study
In this study, we evaluated the hemodynamics of carotid artery bifurcation with various geometries using simulated and volunteer models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was analyzed by use of OpenFOAM. The velocity distribution, streamline, and wall shear stress (WSS) were evaluated in a simulated model with known bifurcation angles (30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, derived from patients’ data) and in three-dimensional (3D) healthy volunteer models. Separated flow was observed at the outer side of the bifurcation, and large bifurcation models represented upstream transfer of the point. Local WSS values at the outer bifurcation [both simulated (<30 Pa) and volunteer (<50 Pa) models] were lower than those in the inner region (>100 Pa). The bifurcation angle had a significant negative correlation with the WSS value (p<0.05). The results of this study show that the carotid artery bifurcation angle is related to the WSS value. This suggests that hemodynamic stress can be estimated based on the carotid artery geometry. The construction of a clinical database for estimation of developing atherosclerosis is warranted.
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamics Pulsatile flow Carotid artery bifurcation angle Wall shear stress Atherosclerosis
This study was supported by the Digital image scientific research conference in Mihara.
Complicance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Kumar V, Cotran SR, Robbins LS. Section10 vascular. Robbins basic pathology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2003. p. 409–54.Google Scholar
- 12.Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T, Bauer S, Strecker C, Schumacher M, Weiller C, Hennig J, Harloff A. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):647–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sarpkaya T. Experimental determination of the critical Reynolds number for pulsating Poiseuille flow. J Fluid Eng. 1966;88(3):589–98.Google Scholar
- 19.De SD, Franjić BD, Lovričević I, Vukelićand M, Palenkić H. Carotid bifurcation position and branching angle in patients with atherosclerotic carotid disease. Coll Antropol. 2005;29(2):627–32.Google Scholar
- 22.Younis HF, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Chan RC, Isasi AG, Hinton DP, Chau AH, Kim LA, Kamm RD. Hemodynamics and wall mechanics in human carotid bifurcation and its consequences for atherogenesis: investigation of inter-individual variation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2004;3(1):17–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar