Advertisement

Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 109–115 | Cite as

Effect of X-ray beam quality on determination of exposure index

  • Shogo YasumatsuEmail author
  • Nobukazu Tanaka
  • Kensuke Iwase
  • Yoichiro Shimizu
  • Junji Morishita
Article

Abstract

We investigated the effect of X-ray beam qualities RQA3, 5, 7, and 9 on the exposure index (EI) as defined by International Electrotechnical Commission guideline 62494-1. Half-value layers (HVLs) of RQA5 X-rays passing through anti-scatter grids (grid ratios 6:1, 8:1, 10:1, and 12:1) were also evaluated because grids are frequently used in clinical situations. The maximum percent differences in the EIs for RQA3, 7, and 9 with respect to RQA5 were 35.0, 11.6, and 38.7 %, respectively. The range of HVLs for RQA5–7 beams was 7.10–9.10 mm of aluminum (mm Al). This was wider than the range of HVLs when grids were used (6.94–7.29 mm Al). The effect of variations in X-ray beam qualities in the RQA series on the EI was significantly greater than the effect of grids. This study indicated that, in clinical settings, the EI should be used carefully in X-ray examinations with different X-ray beam qualities.

Keywords

Exposure index X-ray beam quality Digital radiography Computed radiography Anti-scatter grid 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the editor in chief of this journal, Kunio Doi, Ph.D., The University of Chicago. We also thank the editors and the editorial assistant of this journal, Mrs. Elisabeth Lanzl, for providing initial and final polishing of the submitted manuscript in improving the readability and English expressions, and the reviewers for giving us useful comments and suggestions for improving our manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We have nothing to declare for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    AAPM Report No. 116. An exposure indicator for digital radiography. Report of AAPM Task Group 116. American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICRP Publication 93. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. International Commission on Radiological Protection; Ann. ICRP 34(1). 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vano E. ICRP recommendations on ‘Managing patient dose in digital radiology’. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1–3):126–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seibert JA, Morin RL. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(5):573–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEC 62494-1, Ed. 1.0. Medical electrical equipment—Exposure index of digital X-ray imaging systems—Part 1: definition and requirements for general radiography. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moy JP. Recent developments in X-ray imaging detectors. Nucl Instr Meth A. 2000;442(1):26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEC 61267, Ed. 1.0. Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment—Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IEC 62220-1, Ed. 1.0. Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—Part 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ariga E. Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2011;67(11):1433–7 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kishimoto K, Ariga E, Ishigaki R, Imai M, Kawamoto K, Kobayashi K, Sawada M, Noto K, Nakamae M, Higashide R. Study of appropriate dosing in consideration of image quality and patient dose on the digital radiography. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2011;67(11):1381–97 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tatsumi D, Shiraishi J, Tsushima H, Kusumi K, Utsunomiya A. Relationship between incident dose on the imaging plate and S value associated with computed radiography (CR) systems: quantitative evaluation using uniform exposure. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 1998;54(11):1273–80 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ariga E, Ito S, Deji S, Saze T, Nishizawa K. Development of dosimetry using detectors of diagnostic digital radiography systems. Med Phys. 2007;34(1):166–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Instruction Manual on Image Processing for Fuji Computed Radiography. 2nd edn. FUJIFILM Corporation; 2001 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taniguchi S, Yamadera A, Nakamura T, Fukuda K. Development of a new personal dosemeter for low energy X rays using an imaging plate. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1999;85(1–4):7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doyle P, Gentle D, Martin CJ. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1–3):236–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tucker DM, Rezentes PS. The relationship between pixel value and beam quality in photostimulable phosphor imaging. Med Phys. 1997;24(6):887–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities. Med Phys. 2005;32(2):343–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan HP, Doi K. Physical characteristics of scattered radiation and the performance of antiscatter grids in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics. 1982;2(3):378–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shogo Yasumatsu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nobukazu Tanaka
    • 2
  • Kensuke Iwase
    • 1
  • Yoichiro Shimizu
    • 1
  • Junji Morishita
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Radiological Science, Faculty of Health SciencesJunshin Gakuen UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations