Radiological Physics and Technology

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 273–280 | Cite as

Simulation system for understanding the lag effect in fluoroscopic images

  • Rie Tanaka
  • Hiroki Kawashima
  • Katsuhiro Ichikawa
  • Kosuke Matsubara
  • Hiroji Iida
  • Shigeru Sanada


Real-time tumor tracking in external radiotherapy can be achieved by diagnostic (kV) X-ray imaging with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD). It is crucial to understand the effects of image lag for real-time tumor tracking. Our purpose in this study was to develop a lag simulation system based on the image lag properties of an FPD system. Image lag properties were measured on flat-field images both in direct- and indirect-conversion dynamic FPDs. A moving target with image lag was simulated based on the lag properties in all combinations of FPD types, imaging rates, exposure doses, and target speeds, and then compared with actual moving targets for investigation of the reproducibility of image lag. Image lag was simulated successfully and agreed well with the actual lag as well as with the predicted effect. In the indirect-conversion FPD, a higher dose caused greater image lag on images. In contrast, there were no significant differences among dose levels in a direct-conversion FPD. There were no relationships between target speed and amount of image blurring in either type of FPD. The maximum contour blurring and the rate of increase in pixel value due to image lag were 1.1 mm and 10.0 %, respectively, in all combinations of imaging parameters examined in this study. Blurred boundaries and changes in pixel value due to image lag were estimated under various imaging conditions with use of the simulation system. Our system would be helpful for a better understanding of the effects of image lag in fluoroscopic images.


Image lag Simulation Target tracking Image-guided radiotherapy Flat-panel detector (FPD) 



This work was supported in part by a research grant from the Japanese Society of Medical Physics (JSMP).


  1. 1.
    Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, Martinez AA. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1337–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore CJ, Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes JR, Davies J, Stratford J, et al. Developments in and experience of kilovoltage X-ray cone beam image-guided radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huntzinger C, Munro P, Johnson S, Miettinen M, Zankowski C, Ahlstrom G, et al. Dynamic targeting image-guided radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2006;31:113–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao W, Degrescenzo G, Rowlands JA. Investigation of lag and ghosting in amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors. SPIE medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 2002;4682:9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Mawdsley GE, Hunter DM, Beideck DJ. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system. Med Phys. 2006;33:2998–3005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect detection flat-panel imager. Med Phys. 1999;26:1624–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choquette M, Rougeot H, Martin J, Laperriere L, Shukri Z, Polischuk B. Direct selenium x-ray detector for fluoloscopy, R&F, and radiography. SPIE medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 2000;3977:128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adachi S, Hori N, Sato K, Tokuda S, Sato T, Uehara K, et al. Experimental evaluation of a-Se and CdTe flat-panel detectors for digital radiography and fluoroscopy. SPIE medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 2000;3977:38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schroeder C, Stanescu T, Rathee S, Fallone BG. Lag measurement in an a-Se active matrix flat-panel imager. Med Phys. 2004;31:1203–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pokischuk B, Shukri Z, Legros A, Rougeot H. Selenium direct converter structure for static and dynamic x-ray detection in medical imaging applications. SPIE medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 1998;3336:494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee DL, Cheung LK, Rodricks B, Powell GF. Improved imaging performance of 14x17-inch direct radiography system using Se/TFT detector. SPIE medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 1998;3336:14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsukamoto A, Yamada S, Tomisaki T, Tanaka M, Sakaguchi T, Asahina H, et al. Development and evaluation of a large-area selenium-based flat panel detector for real-time radiography and fluoroscopy, SPIE medical imaging. Proc SPIE. 1999;3659:14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanaka R, Ichikawa K, Mori S, Dobashi S, Kumagai M, Kawashima H, et al. Investigation on effect of image lag in fluoroscopic images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) on accuracy of target tracking in radiotherapy. JRR. 2010;51:723–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawashima H, Tanaka R, Ichikawa K, Matsubara K, Iida H, Sanada S. Effect of image lag and influencing factor in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD). J comput assist radiol surg. 2012;7(1):S60–1.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Determination of the detective quantum efficiency—detectors used in dynamic imaging. In: Proceedings IEC International standard 62220-1. Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment-Characteristics of digital imaging devices-Part 3 Geneva, International electrotechnical commission; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    West JB. Respiratory Physiology—the Essentialsm, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkinss; 2000. p. 11–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teramoto A, Kajihara T, Suzuki S, Kinoshita K, Tsuzaka M, Fujita H. Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors. Radiol Phys Technol. 2011;4:164–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Sivananthan MU. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Clinical Radilogy. 2008;63:1073–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rie Tanaka
    • 1
  • Hiroki Kawashima
    • 2
    • 3
  • Katsuhiro Ichikawa
    • 1
  • Kosuke Matsubara
    • 1
  • Hiroji Iida
    • 3
  • Shigeru Sanada
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, College of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health SciencesKanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Radiological TechnologyKanazawa University HospitalKanazawaJapan

Personalised recommendations