Absence of cellular damage in tropical newly hatched sharks (Chiloscyllium plagiosum) under ocean acidification conditions
Sharks have maintained a key role in marine food webs for 400 million years and across varying physicochemical contexts, suggesting plasticity to environmental change. In this study, we investigated the biochemical effects of ocean acidification (OA) levels predicted for 2100 (pCO2 ~ 900 μatm) on newly hatched tropical whitespotted bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium plagiosum). Specifically, we measured lipid, protein, and DNA damage levels, as well as changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic ROS scavengers in juvenile sharks exposed to elevated CO2 for 50 days following hatching. Moreover, we also assessed the secondary oxidative stress response, i.e., heat shock response and ubiquitin levels. Newly hatched sharks appear to cope with OA-related stress through a range of tissue-specific biochemical strategies, specifically through the action of antioxidant enzymatic compounds. Our findings suggest that ROS-scavenging molecules, rather than complex enzymatic proteins, provide an effective defense mechanism in dealing with OA-elicited ROS formation. We argue that sharks’ ancient antioxidant system, strongly based on non-enzymatic antioxidants (e.g., urea), may provide them with resilience towards OA, potentially beyond the tolerance of more recently evolved species, i.e., teleosts. Nevertheless, previous research has provided evidence of detrimental effects of OA (interacting with other climate-related stressors) on some aspects of shark biology. Moreover, given that long-term acclimation and adaptive potential to rapid environmental changes are yet experimentally unaccounted for, future research is warranted to accurately predict shark physiological performance under future ocean conditions.
KeywordsCarbon dioxide CO2 Elasmobranchs Antioxidant systems Heat shock response Oxidative damage
We would like to thank Eduarda Pinto for the fundamental technical support during the preparation of the experimental setup and shark acclimation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Competing of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Bartosz G (2003) Total antioxidant capacity. In: Spiegel HE, Nowacki G, Hsiao K-J (eds) Advances in clinical chemistry, vol 37. Academic press, California, pp 220–272Google Scholar
- Burnett LE (1997) The challenges of living in hypoxic and hypercapnic aquatic environments. Integr Comp Biol 37:633–640Google Scholar
- Filho DW, Boveris A (1993) Antioxidant defences in marine fish—II. Elasmobranchs. Comp Biochem Physiol C 106:415–418Google Scholar
- Gattuso J-P, Hansson L (2011) Ocean acidification: background and history. In: Gattuso J-P, Hansson L (eds) Ocean acidification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–17Google Scholar
- Heinrich DDU, Rummer JL, Morash AJ, Watson S-A, Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Munday PL (2014) A product of its environment: the epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum) exhibits physiological tolerance to elevated environmental CO2. Conservation Physiology 2(1):cou047–cou047Google Scholar
- Heinrich DDU, Watson S-A, Rummer JL, Brandl SJ, Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Munday PL (2016) Foraging behaviour of the epaulette shark Hemiscyllium ocellatum is not affected by elevated CO2. ICES J Mar Sci: J Conseil 73(3):633–640Google Scholar
- Lewis E, Wallace DWR (1998) CO2SYS-Program developed for the CO2 system calculations. Report ORNL/CDIAC-105Google Scholar
- López-Cruz RI, Dafre AL, Filho DW (2012) Oxidative stress in sharks and rays. In: D Abele Vázquez-Medina JP, Zenteno-Savín T (eds) Oxidative stress in aquatic ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–163Google Scholar
- NOAA (2017) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network Google Scholar
- Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Doney SC, Feely RA, Gnanadesikan A, Gruber N, Ishida A, Joos F, Key RM, Lindsay K, Maier-Reimer E, Matear R, Monfray P, Mouchet A, Najjar RG, Plattner G-K, Rodgers KB, Sabine CL, Sarmiento JL, Schlitzer R, Slater RD, Totterdell IJ, Weirig M-F, Yamanaka Y, Yool A (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437:681–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pörtner H-O, Karl DM, Cheung WWL, Lluch-Cota SE, Nojiri Y, Schmidt DN, Zavialov PO (2014) Ocean systems. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerabilities. part A: global and sectorial aspects contribution of working group II to the fifth assessement report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, pp 411–484Google Scholar
- Rudneva II (1999) Antioxidant system of Black Sea animals in early development. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 122:265–271Google Scholar
- Rudneva II, Dorokhova II, Skuratovskaya EN, Kuz'minova NS (2014) Comparative studies of hepatic and blood biomarkers in three species of black sea elasmobranchs. Int J Mar Sci 4:1–14Google Scholar
- Sampaio E, Lopes AR, Francisco S, Paula JR, Pimentel M, Maulvault AL, Repolho T, Grilo TF, Pousão-Ferreira P, Marques A, Rosa R (2018) Ocean acidification dampens physiological stress response to warming and contamination in a commercially-important fish (Argyrosomus regius). Sci Total Environ 618:388–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solé M, Rodríguez S, Papiol V, Maynou F, Cartes JE (2009) Xenobiotic metabolism markers in marine fish with different trophic strategies and their relationship to ecological variables. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C 149:83–89Google Scholar
- Zeebe RE, Ridgwell A (2011) Past changes in ocean carbonate chemistry. In: Gattuso J-P, Hansson L (eds) Ocean acidification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 21–37Google Scholar