Toric fiber products versus Segre products

Article

Abstract

The toric fiber product is an operation that combines two ideals that are homogeneous with respect to a grading by an affine monoid. The Segre product is a related construction that combines two multigraded rings. The quotient ring by a toric fiber product of two ideals is a subring of the Segre product, but in general this inclusion is strict. We contrast the two constructions and show that any Segre product can be presented as a toric fiber product without changing the involved quotient rings. This allows to apply previous results about toric fiber products to the study of Segre products. We give criteria for the Segre product of two affine toric varieties to be dense in their toric fiber product, and for the map from the Segre product to the toric fiber product to be finite. We give an example that shows that the quotient ring of a toric fiber product of normal ideals need not be normal. In rings with Veronese type gradings, we find examples of toric fiber products that are always Segre products, and we show that iterated toric fiber products of Veronese ideals over Veronese rings are normal.

Keywords

Affine monoid ring Segre product Toric ideal Toric fiber product  Veronese ring 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Primary 13C05 Secondary 05E40 13A02 14M25 20M25 

References

  1. 1.
    Bruns, W., Gubeladze, J.: Polytopes, Rings, and \(K\)-Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buczyńska, W., Buczyński, J., Kubjas, K., Michałek, M.: On the graph labellings arising from phylogenetics. Central Eur. J. Math. 11(9), 1577–1592 (2013)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, Y., Dinwoodie, I.H., Sullivant, S.: Sequential importance sampling for multiway tables. Ann. Statist. 34(1), 523–545 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chow, W.: On unmixedness theorem. Amer. J. Math. 86(4), 799–822 (1964)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Loera, J.A., Hemmecke, R., Köppe, M.: Algebraic and Geometric Ideas in the Theory of Discrete Optimization. SIAM, MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engström, A., Kahle, T., Sullivant, S.: Multigraded commutative algebra of graph decompositions. J. Algebr. Combinat. 39(2), 335–372 (2014)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sturmfels, B.: Gröbner Bases and Convex Polytopes. University Lecture Series, vol. 8. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sullivant, S.: Toric fiber products. J. Algebra 316(2), 560–577 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sullivant, S.: Normal binary graph models. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 62(4), 716–726 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swanson, I., Huneke, C.: Integral Closure of Ideals, Rings, and Modules. LMS Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takemura, A., Thomas, P., Yoshida, R.: Holes in semigroups and their applications to the two-way common diagonal effect model. In: Proceedings 2008 International Conference on Information Theory and Statistical Learning. CSREA Press, USA. pp. 67–72 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tousi, M., Yassemi, S.: Tensor products of some special rings. J. Algebra 268(2), 672–676 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematisches Seminar der Universität Hamburg and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät für MathematikOtto-von-Guericke UniversitätMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.MPI MISLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations