Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The Subjective Well-Being of Students in Different Parts of the School Premises in French Middle Schools

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the spatial approach to well-being in French middle schools, drawing on an ecological model of child development to explore how student well-being varies through the day according to the part of the school premises they are in. 2028 (from 11 to 15 years old) students took part in the survey. The results confirm that a spatial approach is interesting because it reveals different levels of subjective well-being according to place. The results also show that the decrease in student well-being between the first and the fourth year is more about learning spaces; other spaces do not result in this decrease. Our study highlights the usefulness of this ecological framework and the importance of complementary qualitative approaches and studies in different cultural contexts for a better understanding of variations in student well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    These were teachers with whom we had previously worked (regular reception of trainee teachers, for example). The sample is therefore non-probabilistic.

  2. 2.

    The 19 places asked about are: classroom, resource center/library, supervised work room, sports hall, corridors, stairs, locker area, entrance hall, bicycle shed, Physical Education changing rooms, toilets, administrative offices, Principal Educational Advisor’s (PEA) office, playground, dining room, supervisors’ office, “gate,” school bus stop, swimming pool.

  3. 3.

    The statements in French were: “Je me sens bien dans l’établissement”; “Je me sens bien lorsque je suis dans les salles de classe”.

  4. 4.

    Je suis content-e de venir au college.”

  5. 5.

    Je me suis senti(e) bien.”

  6. 6.

    Je me suis senti(e) triste.”

  7. 7.

    19 places for the cognitive component of well-being and 18 for the affective component, since the swimming pool was not included for the latter.

  8. 8.

    We apply the Bonferroni correction to the initial threshold of p = 0.05: given that there are 18 places, the corrected value of p = 0.05/18 = 0.0027.

  9. 9.

    2028 students answered on 3 or 4 places (depending on version of questionnaire).

  10. 10.

    We apply the Bonferroni correction to the initial threshold of p = 0.05: given that there are 19 places, the corrected value of p = 0.05/19 = 0.0026.

References

  1. AFEV (2017). La perception du climat scolaire par les collégiens scolarisés en réseau d’éducation prioritaire, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6QNZT6GReI7UXJhVlJ5NEpXZmM/view.

  2. Allen, J. D. (1986). Classroom management: Students’ perspectives, goals, and strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 437–459.

  3. Baker, A. J., Dilly, L. J., Aupperlee, J. L., & Patil, S. A. (2003). The developmental context of school satisfaction: Schools as psychologically healthy environments. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 206–221.

  4. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187–249.

  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Nueva York: Russell Sage.

  9. Casas, F., & González, M. (2017). School: One world or two worlds? Children’s perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 157–170.

  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  11. Conseil National d’Évaluation du Système Scolaire (CNESCO). (2017). Enquête sur la restauration et l’architecture scolaires. Paris: CNESCO.

  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

  13. Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.

  14. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., van Pallant, J., Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian unity well-being index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.

  15. Currie, C., Gabhainn, S.N., Godeau, E., Roberts, C., Smith, R., Currie, D., Picket, W., Richter, M., Morgan, A. & Barnekow, V. (2008). Inequalities in Young people’s health. Health behaviour in school-aged children international report from the 2005/2006 survey. Health policy for children and adolescents, n°5.

  16. Danielsen, A., Breivik, K., & Wold, B. (2011). Do perceived academic competence and school satisfaction mediate the relationship between perceived support provided by teachers and classmates, and academic initiative? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 379–401.

  17. Derouet-Besson, M. (2005). L’apport de l’école à la construction d’une culture architecturale en France. Revue de l’Inspection Générale, 2, 4–19.

  18. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

  19. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.

  20. Diener, E., Diener, C., & Diener, M. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.

  21. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi. D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247–266.

  22. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.

  23. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). School and community influences on human development. In M. H. Borstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (pp. 571–642). New York: Psychology Press.

  24. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.

  25. Elmore, G. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). Adolescents’ satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 525–537.

  26. Ferrière, S., Bacro, F., Florin, A., & Guimard, P. (2016). Le bien-être en contexte scolaire: Intérêt d’une approche par triangulation méthodologique. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 111, 341–365.

  27. Florin, A. & Guimard, P. (2017). La qualité de vie à l’école. Paris: Conseil National d’Évaluation du Système Scolaire (CNESCO).

  28. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  29. Gonzalez-Carrasco, M., Casas, M., Vinas, F., & Dinisman, T. (2016). Changes with age in subjective well-being through the adolescent years: Differences by gender. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(1), 63–88.

  30. Guimard, P., Bacro, F., Ferrière, S., Florin, A., Gaudeville, T., & Ngo, H. T. (2015). Le bien-être des élèves à l’école et au collège. Validation d’une echelle multidimensionnelle, analyses descriptives et différentielles. Education & Formations, 88(89), 163–184.

  31. Guimard, P. Bacro, F., Ferrière, S., Florin, A. & Gaudonville, T. (2017). Evaluation du bien-être perçu des élèves: étude longitudinale à l’école élémentaire et au collège. Recherche complémentaire (BE-Scol2). Rapport pour la Direction de l’évaluation de la prospective et de la performance. Convention 2015 - DEPP – 028.

  32. Hébert T. & Dugas E. (2017). Quels espaces scolaires pour le bien-être relationnel ? Enquête sur le ressenti des collégiens français. Éducation et Socialisation, Les Cahiers du CERFEE, 43. https://doi.org/10.4000/edso.1904.

  33. Hubert, T. (2015). Le climat scolaire perçu par les collégiens, Éducation & Formations, 88-89, 79-99.

  34. Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student's life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12(3), 231–240.

  35. Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children, Psychological Assessment, 6, 149 –158.

  36. Huebner, E. S., & Gilman, R. (2006). Students who like and dislike school. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 139–150.

  37. Hui, E., & Sun, R. (2010). Chinese children’s perceived school satisfaction: The role of contextual and intrapersonal factors. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 30(2), 155–172.

  38. Hunt, D. E. (1975). Person-environment interaction: A challenge found wanting before it was tried. Review of Educational Research, 45, 209–230.

  39. Joing, I., & Vors, O. (2014). Le temps des vestiaires d’EPS au collège: climat, victimation et stratégies enseignantes. Geneva: Congrès de l’ARIS.

  40. Joing, I., & Vors, O. (2015). Victimation et climat scolaire au collège: les vestiaires d’Education Physique et Sportive. Déviance et Société, 39(1), 51–71.

  41. Joing, I., Vors, O., Lléna, C., & Potdevin, F. (2018). Se sentir bien dans chacun des lieux de l’espace scolaire au college. Le role de l’autonomie, de l’appartenance sociale, de la perception du lieu et du sentiment de sécurité. Spiral-E, Revue de recherches en Éducation, 61, 19–40.

  42. Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–142.

  43. Lenoir, M. (2012). Le bien-être de l’élève au college: representations des professeurs et des élèves, Université de Lyon 2: thèse de doctorat.

  44. Lester, L., & Cross, D. (2015). The relationship between school climate and mental and emotional wellbeing over the transition from primary to secondary school. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13612-015-0037-8.

  45. Liu, W., Mei, J., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Age and gender differences in the relation between school-related social support and subjective well-being in school among students. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 1065–1083.

  46. Martin-Krumm, C., Fenouillet, F., Csillik, A., Kern, L., Besancon, M., Heutte, J., Paquet, Y., Delas, Y., Trousselard, M., Lecore, B. & Diener, E. (2016). Changes in Emotions from Childhood to Young Adulthood, Child Indicators Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9440-9.

  47. Mazalto, M., & Paltrinieri, L. (2013). Espaces scolaires et projets éducatifs. Revue internationale d’Education de Sèvres, 64, 31–40.

  48. McWhirter, J. J., McWhirter, B. T., McWhirter, E. H., & McWhirter, A. C. (2017). At risk youth: A comprehensive response for counselors, teachers, psychologist, and human service professionals. Boston: Cengage Learning.

  49. Myers, D. G. (1992). The pursuit of happiness: Who is happy – And why. New York: William Morrow.

  50. Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  51. OCDE (2013). France. Pisa 2012: faits marquants. https://www.oecd.org/france/PISA-2012-resultsfrance.pdf

  52. OCDE (2015). Relations enseignants-élèves: quelle incidence sur le bien-être des élèves à l’école ? Pisa à la loupe, n°50, Edition de l’OCDE.

  53. Okun, M. A., Braver, M. W., & Weir, R. M. (1990). Grade level differences in school satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 22, 419–427.

  54. Pavot, W. (2018). The cornerstone of research on subjective well-being: Valid assessment methodology. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & I. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers.

  55. Pourchet, G., & Cerfontaine, J. Y. (2005). Des espaces d’enseignement aux lieux de vie : leçons d’une enquête. Revue de l’Inspection Générale, 2, 47–55.

  56. Randolph, J., Kangas, M. M., & Ruokamo, H. (2010). Predictors of Dutch and Finnish children’s satisfaction with schooling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 193–204.

  57. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K., Gable, S., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.

  58. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99–104.

  59. Salmena-Aro, K., & Tynkkynen, L. (2010). Trajectories of life satisfaction across transition to post-compulsory education: Do adolescents follow different pathways? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 870–881.

  60. Sgard, A., & Hoyaux, A. F. (2006). L’élève et son lycée: de l’espace scolaire aux constructions des territoires lycéens. L’information géographique, 70(3), 87–108.

  61. Shin, R., Morgan, M., Buhin, L., Truitt, T., & Vera, E. (2010). Expanding the discourse on urban youth of color. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 421–426.

  62. Tian, L., Tian, Q., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). School-related social support and adolescents’ school-related subjective well-being: The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction at school. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 105–129.

  63. Uusitalo-Malmivaara, L. (2014). Happiness decreases during early adolescence – A study on 12- and 15-year-old Finnish students. Psychology, 5, 541–555. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.56064.

  64. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Isabelle Joing.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joing, I., Vors, O. & Potdevin, F. The Subjective Well-Being of Students in Different Parts of the School Premises in French Middle Schools. Child Ind Res (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09714-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Places
  • Ecological framework
  • France
  • Subjective well-being
  • School
  • Spatial approach