Advertisement

A Canadian Neighbourhood Index for Socioeconomic Status Associated with Early Child Development

  • Barry ForerEmail author
  • Anita Minh
  • Jennifer Enns
  • Simon Webb
  • Eric Duku
  • Marni Brownell
  • Nazeem Muhajarine
  • Magdalena Janus
  • Martin Guhn
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Neighbourhoods encompass the social, institutional, and environmental determinants that influence the developmental health of the children who reside in them. A number of different socioeconomic indices have been developed to determine which neighbourhood-level indicators are most strongly associated with early child development outcomes in Canada. While these indices attempt to account for variability in outcomes across neighbourhoods, they have some important limitations: they either do not use indicators meaningful for families with young children or they are based on a large number of indicators. Here we describe how we developed a new index, the Canadian Neighbourhoods Early Child Development (CanNECD) SES Index, which addresses these limitations. Socioeconomic and demographic variables for custom-defined neighbourhoods were obtained from Canada Census and income tax data. Measures of developmental health came from the Early Development Instrument, a teacher-completed questionnaire measuring vulnerability across five developmental domains in kindergarten. We selected variables for the index based on empirical relationships to health and/or social determinants of health, then used exploratory factor analyses and linear regressions to choose ten variables that maximized explanatory power and interpretability for developmental health. The CanNECD SES Index accounts for 32% of the variance in neighbourhood-level overall vulnerability across developmental domains, whereas existing indices account for 17% or less. Analyses within individual Canadian provinces indicate that the explanatory power of our index ranges from 13 to 42%. This new tool will help us understand patterns of children’s developmental health as they relate to social determinants of health. It can be used in combination with other datasets to examine neighbourhood effects on children’s developmental health outcomes.

Keywords

Socioeconomic status Early child development Neighbourhood Early Development Instrument Social determinants of health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conceived by Clyde Hertzman, Martin Guhn, and Magdalena Janus, who were the co-Principal Investigators on the Canadian Institutes of Health Research operating grant that supported this work.

Funding

The study was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN 125965).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Behavioural Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia. The confidentiality of study participants is protected as the EDI, Census and Income Taxfiler data for this project are aggregated to the neighbourhood level, and hosted in a secure database system. As such, informed consent was not required.

Supplementary material

12187_2019_9666_MOESM1_ESM.docx (42 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 41 kb)

References

  1. Andrich, D., & Styles, I. (2004). Final report on the psychometric analysis of the Early Development Instrument (EDI) using the Rasch model: A technical paper commissioned for the development of the Australian Early Development Instrument (AEDI). Perth, Australia. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.495.5875&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  2. Brownell, M., Friesen, D., & Mayer, T. (2002). Childhood injury rates in Manitoba: Socioeconomic influences. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93(Suppl 2), S50–S56.Google Scholar
  3. Burrows, S., Auger, N., Roy, M., & Alix, C. (2010). Socio-economic inequalities in suicide attempts and suicide mortality in Quebec, Canada, 1990-2005. Public Health, 124(2), 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, M., Dubois, L., Tremblay, M., Taljaard, M., & Jones, B. (2012). Trajectories of childhood weight gain: The relative importance of local environment versus individual social and early life factors. PLoS One, 7(10), e47065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, E., Serrano, J., Chen, L., Stieb, D., Jerrett, M., & Osornio-Vargas, A. (2015). Development of a Canadian socioeconomic status index for the study of health outcomes related to environmental pollution. BMC Public Health, 15, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chateau, D., Metge, C., Prior, H., & Soodeen, R. A. (2012). Learning from the census: The Socio-economic Factor Index (SEFI) and health outcomes in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(1920-7476 (Electronic)), S23–S27.Google Scholar
  7. Durbin, A., Moineddin, R., Lin, E., Steele, L., & Glazier, R. (2015). Examining the relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and mental health service use of immigrants in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 5(3), e006690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzpatrick, T., Rosella, L., Calzavara, A., Petch, J., Pinto, A., Manson, H., et al. (2015). Looking beyond income and education: Socioeconomic status gradients among future high-cost users of health care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forer, B., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Validation of multilevel constructs: Validation methods and empirical findings for the EDI. Social Indicators Research, 103, 231–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forer, B., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. (2013). Using micro-simulation to investigate the “reliability of change over time” for aggregated child development scores. In Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  11. Girden, E. (2001). Evaluating research articles from start to finish. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Guhn, M., Janus, M., Enns, J., Brownell, M., Forer, B., Duku, E., Muhajarine, N., & Raos, R. (2016). Examining the social determinants of children’s developmental health: Protocol for building a pan-Canadian population-based monitoring system for early childhood development. BMJ Open, 6, e012020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman, J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertzman, C. (2010). Social geography of developmental health in the early years. Healthcare Quarterly, 14(Spec No 1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  15. Hertzman, C., & Boyce, T. (2010). How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janus, M., & Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 39(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janus, M., Brick, S. A., & Duku, E. R. (2011). Validity and psychometric properties of the early development instrument in Canada, Australia, United States and Jamaica. Social Indicators Research, 103, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janus, M., Enns, J., Forer, B., Raos, R., Gaskin, A., Webb, S., et al. (2018). A pan-Canadian data resource for monitoring child developmental health: The Canadian Neighbourhoods Early Child Development (CanNECD) database. International Journal of Population Data Science, 3(3), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, D., Greenberg, M., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. The American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283–2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keating, D. P., & Hertzman, C. (Eds.). (1999). Developmental health and the wealth of nations: Social, biological and educational dynamics. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Krishnan, V. (2010). Constructing an area-based socioeconomic index: A principal components analysis approach. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b115/2cdc9e9ca217434db492a9e1c4ba519640ce.pdf?_ga=2.136283383.732444407.1564412496-705591015.1548349375. Early Child Development Mapping Project Alberta, University of Alberta. Accessed 29 Jul 2019.
  22. Lalloué, B., Monnez, J.-M., Padilla, C., Kihal, W., Le Meur, N., Zmirou-Navier, D., & Deguen, S. (2013). A statistical procedure to create a neighborhood socioeconomic index for health inequalities analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lavergne, M., Johnston, G., Gao, J., Dummer, T., & Rheaume, D. (2001). Variation in the use of palliative radiotherapy at end of life: Examining demographic, clinical, health service, and geographic factors in a population-based study. Palliative Medicine, 25(2), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levanthal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macdonald, E., Ng, R., Bayoumi, A., Raboud, J., Masinde, K., Tharao, W., et al. (2015). Adverse neonatal outcomes among women living with HIV: A population-based study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 37(4), 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marmot, M., Smith, G., Stansfeld, S., Patel, C., North, F., Head, J., et al. (1991). Health ineqaulities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Lancet, 337(8754), 1387–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martens, P. J., Frohlich, N., Carriere, K. C., Derksen, S., & Brownell, M. (2002). Embedding child health within a framework of regional health: Population health status and sociodemographic indicators. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93 Suppl 2(0008-4263 (Print)), S15–S20.Google Scholar
  28. Martinez, J., Pampalon, R., & Hamel, D. (2003). Deprivation and stroke mortality in Quebec. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 24(2–3), 57–64.Google Scholar
  29. Matheson, F. I., Dunn, J. R., Smith, K. L., Moineddin, R., & Glazier, R. H. (2012). Development of the Canadian marginalization index: A new tool for the study of inequality. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(1920-7476 (electronic)), S12–S16.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, S., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighbourhoods: How much does it matter? Science, 243(4897), 1441–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minh, A., Muhajarine, N., Janus, M., Brownell, M., & Guhn, M. (2017). A review of neighbourhood effects and early child development: How, where, and for whom, do neighbourhoods matter? Health & Place, 46, 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pampalon, R., & Raymond, G. (2000). A deprivation index for health and welfare planning in Quebec. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 21(0228-8699 (print)), 104–113.Google Scholar
  33. Pampalon R., Hamel D., Gamache P., & Raymond G. (2009) A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 29(4):178–91.Google Scholar
  34. Pampalon, R., Hamel, D., Gamache, P., Simpson, A., & Philibert, M. (2014). Validation of a deprivation index for public health: A complex exercise illustrated by the Quebec index. Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada, 34(1), 12–22.Google Scholar
  35. Polsky, J. Y., Moineddin, R., Dunn, J., Glazier, R., & Booth, G. (2016). Absolute and relative densities of fast-food versus other restaurants in relation to weight status: Does restaurant mix matter? Preventive Medicine, 82, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prouse, V., Ramos, R., Grant, J., & Radice, M. (2014). How and when scale matters: The modifiable areal unit problem and income inequality in Halifax. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 23(1), 61–82.Google Scholar
  37. Rivera, L., Lebenbaum, M., & Rosella, L. (2015). The influence of socioeconomic status on future risk for developing type 2 diabetes in the Canadian population between 2011 and 2022: Differential associations by sex. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roos, N., Roos, L., Brownell, M., & Fuller, E. (2010). Enhancing policymakers’ understanding of disparities: Relevant data from an information-rich environment. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 382–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sampson, R., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silverman, J., Hutchison, M., & Cusimano, M. (2013). Association between neighbourhood marginalization and pedestrian and cyclist collisions in Toronto intersections. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 104(5), E405–E409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Statistics Canada. (2018). 2011 Census of Population Program: Topics. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/rt-td/index-eng.cfm
  42. Thomas, D., Hughes, E., & Zumbo, B. (1998). On variable importance in linear regression. Social Indicators Research, 45(1), 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Townsend, P. (1987). Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Townsend, P., Phillimore, P., & Beattie, A. (1997). Health and deprivation: Inequality and the North Croom helm. In K. Soothill, L. Mackay, & L. Malia (Eds.), Classic texts in health care. Oxford: Reed Educational and Professional Publishing, Ltd..Google Scholar
  45. Webb, S., Janus, M., Duku, E., Raos, R., Brownell, M., Forer, B., Guhn, M., & Muhajarine, N. (2017). Neighbourhood scocioeconomic status indices and early childhood development. SSM Population Health, 3, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu, A., Zumbo, B., & Marshall, S. (2014). A method to aid in the interpretation of EFA results: An application of Pratt’s measures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(1), 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Early Learning Partnership, School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health SciencesUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  3. 3.Offord Centre for Child StudiesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Community Health and Epidemiology and Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research UnitUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations