Advertisement

The Subjective Well-Being of Children and Young People in out of Home Care: Psychometric Analyses of the “Your Life, your Care” Survey

  • Mary F. ZhangEmail author
  • Julie Selwyn
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

In contrast to the burgeoning research on the subjective well-being (SWB) of children in the general population, the SWB of children and young people in out of home care (OHC) has received far less research and policy attention. To ensure that policy and practice interventions can effectively improve the lives of children and young people in OHC, there is an urgent need for reliable and valid measures of their SWB. The current study begins to address this knowledge gap, providing an in-depth examination of the psychometric properties of the “Your Life, Your Care” survey. The reliability and validity of the survey questions were examined using classic test theory, item response theory, confirmatory factor analysis and logistic regression. Analysing data from 1221 participants aged 11–18 years, we found that all the survey questions were a reliable and valid measure of SWB except for questions on feelings about family contact and bullying. More importantly, the results indicated that SWB of children and young people in OHC was a multi-dimensional construct that can be operationally defined and measured as feeling good and functioning effectively at both individual and interpersonal levels. The theoretical, methodological and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Children Flourishing Subjective well-being Out of home care Item response theory Confirmatory factor analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Hadley Trust funded the development of the surveys. Coram Voice (a children’s rights charity) recruited and supported all the local authorities who chose to use the “Your Life, Your Care” survey. Their work was essential to the successful running and dissemination of the findings in each local authority.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alliance for Children in Care and Care Leavers. (2016). A New Vision. http://www.tactcare.org.uk/content/uploads/2017/01/alliance-for-children-in-care-a-new-vision.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  2. Allin, P., & Hand, D. J. (2017). New statistics for old? — Measuring the well-being of the UK. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 180(1), 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. US: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  4. Bache, I., & Reardon, L. (2013). An idea whose time has come? Explaining the rise of the well-being in British politics. Political Studies, 61(4), 898–914.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 573–596.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4645-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, J. (Ed.). (2016). The Well-being of Children in the UK (4th Ed). Bristol, United Kingdom: Policy Press.  https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447325628.001.0001.
  7. Bradshaw, J., Crous, G., Rees, G., & Turner, N. (2017). Comparing children’s experiences of schools-based bullying across countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS-windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Casas, F., & Rees, G. (2015). Measures of children’s subjective well-being: Analysis of the potential for cross-national comparisons. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 49–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9293-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Children’s Commissioner for England (2015). State of the Nation: Children in Care. www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Care-monitor-v12_1.pdf. Accessed 06 June 2019.
  12. Cooke, P. J., Melchert, T. P., & Connor, K. (2016). Measuring well-being: A review of instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(5), 730–757.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016633507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Department for Education. (2018). Children Looked After in England Including Adoption: 2017 to 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/children-looked-after-in-england-including-adoption-2017-to-2018. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  16. DiBello, L. V., & Stout, W. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction and overview: IRT-based cognitive diagnostic models and related methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(4), 285–291.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00039.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, R., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. F. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334074.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., & Probst, T. M. (2000). Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 305–313.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Fox, J. P. (2010). Bayesian item response modeling: Theory and applications. London/New York: Springer Science+Business Media.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0742-4.
  21. Finch, W. H., Jr., & French, B. F. (2015). Latent variable modeling with R. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Fontanella, L., Villano, P., & Di Donato, M. (2016). Attitudes towards Roma people and migrants: A comparison through a Bayesian multidimensional IRT model. Quality & Quantity, 50(2), 471–490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0158-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forgeard, M. J. C., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring well-being for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 79–106.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fredrickson, B. (2009). Positivity. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Gilligan, R. (2000). Promoting resilience in children in foster care. In G. Kelly & R. Gilligan (Eds.), Issues in Foster Care: Policy, practice and research (pp. 107–126). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Gittleman, M. G., Klein, M. H., Smider, N. A., & Essex, M. J. (1998). Recollections of parental behaviour, adult attachment and mental health: Mediating and moderating effects. Psychological Medicine, 28(6), 1443–1455.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guio, A.-C., Pomati, M., Najera, H., Gordon, D., & Marlier, E. (2018). Towards an EU measure of child deprivation. Child Indicators Research, 11(3), 835–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9491-6.
  29. Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4), 255–282.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  31. Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., Schofield, G., & Duncan, S. (2014). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 4(1), 62–90.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v4i1.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2), 137–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaye-Tzadok, A., Kim, S. S., & Main, G. (2017). Children’s subjective well-being in relation to gender — What can we learn from dissatisfied children? Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 96–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Promoting a life worth living: Human development from the vantage points of mental illness and mental health. In R. M. Lerner, F. Jacobs, & D. Wertlieb (Eds.), Promoting positive child, adolescent and family development: A handbook of program and policy innovations (pp. 257–274). CA: Sage Publications.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233642.n87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York/London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. United Kingdom: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Main, G. (2014). Child poverty and children’s subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 7(3), 451–472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9237-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masten, A., Best, K., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2(4), 425–444.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400005812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: Domain validity and generalizability 1. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 75–79.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2011). Mplus User's Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  44. National Audit Office. (2019). Pressures on Children’s Social Care. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Pressures-on-Childrens-Social-Care.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  45. Office of National Statistics (ONS). (2012). Initial findings from the consultation on proposed domains and measures of National Well-being. https://www.ahsw.org.uk/userfiles/files/ONS_initial_findings.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  46. Office of National Statistics (ONS). (2018a). Loneliness - what characteristics and circumstances are associated with feeling lonely? https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/lonelinesswhatcharacteristicsandcircumstancesareassociatedwithfeelinglonely/2018-04-10. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  47. Office of National Statistics (ONS). (2018b). Children’s Well-being Measures. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/datasets/childrenswellbeingmeasures. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Measuring well-being and Progress: Well-being research. http://www.oecd.org/statistics/measuring-well-being-and-progress.htm. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  49. Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., & Hamilton, J. (2016). The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (IRT). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–469.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. London/New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reise, S. P., Rodriguez, A., Spritzer, K. L., & Hays, R. D. (2018). Alternative approaches to addressing non-Normal distributions in the application of IRT models to personality measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 363–374.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1381969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Revelle, W. (1979). Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(1), 57–74.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1401_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316–331.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryder, R., Edwards, A., & Clements, K. (2017). Measuring the Wellbeing of Children in Care: Views from the Frontline and Opportunities for Change. https://www.ncb.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/attachment/Measuring%20the%20wellbeing%20of%20children%20in%20care_Final%20report.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  56. Sebba, J., Berridge, D., Luke, N., Fletcher, J., Bell, K., Strand, S., Thomas, S., Sinclair, I., & O’Higgins, A. (2015). The educational Progress of looked after children in England: Linking care and educational data. Rees Centre/University of Bristol. http://reescentre.education.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/EducationalProgressLookedAfterChildrenOverviewReport_Nov2015.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  57. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Selwyn, J., Wood, M., & Newman, T. (2017). Looked after children and young people in England: Developing measures of subjective well-Being. Child Indicators Research, 10(2), 363–380.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9375-1.
  61. Selwyn, J., Magnus, L., & Stuijfzand, B. (2018). Our Lives, Our Care: Looked after children’s views on their well-being in 2017. https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_81008-9.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2019.Google Scholar
  62. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2008). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  63. The Children’s Society. (2008). Happy and They Know It: Developing a Well-being Framework Based on Young People Consultation. https://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/sites/default/files/tcs/research_docs/Happy%20and%20they%20know%20it%20-%20Developing%20a%20well-being%20framework%20based%20on%20young%20people%20consultation.pdf. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  64. The Children’s Society. (2018). The Good Childhood Report 2018. https://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/resources-and-publications/the-good-childhood-report-2018. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  65. Ungar, M. (2004). Nurturing hidden resilience in troubled youth. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.  https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442677975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ungar, M., Ghazinour, M., & Richter, J. (2013). Annual research review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 54(4), 348–366.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (1991). Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf?_ga=2.152931705.1760705325.1554831008-1673119809.1554831008. Accessed 09 April 2019.
  68. Weijers, D., & Jarden, A. (2013). The science of happiness for policymakers: An overview. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 4(2), 21–40.Google Scholar
  69. Wood, M., & Selwyn, J. (2017). Looked after children and young people’s views on what matters to their subjective well–being. Adoption & Fostering, 41(1), 20–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308575916686034.
  70. Zickar, M. J. (2001). Conquering the next frontier: Modeling personality data with item response theory. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Decade of behaviour: Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 141–160). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/10434-006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School for Policy StudiesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations