Advertisement

Notions of Life Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction in Children and Adolescents of Low Socioeconomic Status in Chile

  • Jaime Alfaro-InzunzaEmail author
  • Lorena Ramírez-Casas Del Valle
  • Jorge J. Varela
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

The study of subjective well-being in childhood and adolescence has had a recent and dynamic growth, however, there still exist few qualitative studies that contribute to getting to know about and discussing the sociocultural diversity of well-being, in particular those considering the socioeconomic belonging of the studied groups. The aim of this study is to identify and describe the notions of life satisfaction and dissatisfaction in children and adolescents between 10 and 14 years old, who belong to families of low socioeconomic status. For this, we used a qualitative methodology and qualitative techniques of 12 individual interviews and 6 group interviews, with a total of 52 children and adolescents. Thematic content analysis of emerging categories was carried out. The results indicate that the main and most relevant aspects of children’s and adolescents’ well-being are: the value of close and harmonious relationships; and feeling cared for, loved and supported by significant adults. In turn, they assess entertainment and playing with their friends as satisfactory. At school they value entertaining and participatory learning. It is also significant for them that they feel supported with their personal life projects and that they have opportunities for personal and family progress. Finally, it is noted that they attribute importance to social justice for all persons in situations of inequality or exclusion; and that they assess having clean and safe public spaces as satisfactory.

Keywords

Well-being Life satisfaction Children Adolescence Qualitative studies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research Center for Inclusive Education, PIA Conicyt CIE 160009, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso; and Center for well-being and social coexistence studies, Universidad del Desarrollo.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Camfield, L., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2009a). Wellbeing research in developing countries: Reviewing the role of qualitative methods. Social Indicators Research, 90(1), 5–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9310-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Camfield, L., Streuli, N., & Woodhead, M. (2009b). What's the use of 'well-being' in contexts of child poverty? Approaches to research, monitoring and children's participation. International Journal of Children's Rights, 17(1), 65–109.  https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X357330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casas, F., & Bello, A. (Coord.) (2012). Calidad de Vida y Bienestar Infantil Subjetivo en España. ¿Qué afecta al bienestar de niños y niñas españoles de 1° de ESO? (1st ed.). Madrid: UNICEF España.Google Scholar
  4. Casas, F., Alfaro, J., Sarriera, J., Bedin, L., Grigoras, B., Bălţătescu, S., Malo, S., & Sirlopú, D. (2015). El bienestar subjetivo en la infancia: Estudio de la comparabilidad de 3 escalas psicométricas en 4 países de habla latina. Psicoperspectivas, 14(1), 6–18.  https://doi.org/10.5027/PSICOPERSPECTIVAS-VOL14-ISSUE1-FULLTEXT-522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornejo, A., Céspedes, P., Nuñez, R., Reyes, G., & Rojas, K. (2005). SINAE: Sistema nacional de asignación con equidad para becas JUNAEB. Santiago de Chile. Retrieved from http://www.junaeb.cl/wp-conten/uploads/2013/02/libro_junaeb.pdf.
  6. Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their wellbeing? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within young lives. Social Indicators Research, 90(1), 51–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9312-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. (2011). The Eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denman, C., & Haro, J. (Eds.). (2002). Por los rincones. Antología de Métodos Cualitativos en la Investigación Social. México: Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
  9. Díaz, D., Blanco, A., & Durán, M. (2011). La estructura del bienestar: el encuentro empírico de tres tradiciones. Revista de Psicología Social, 26(3), 357–372.  https://doi.org/10.1174/021347411797361266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80(5), 29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9019-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huebner, E. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66(1/2), 3–33.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308316892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manzoor, A., Siddique,A., Ashgar, K., Nazir, R., & Hassan, S. (2015). Child health; aassociation between children’s subjective well-being, age and socioeconomic status. Professional Med, 22(7),924–930.Google Scholar
  15. Mella, O. (1998). Naturaleza y orientaciones teórico-metodológicas de la investigación cualitativa.Santiago-Chile: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Educación. Retrieved from http://www.reduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NATURALEZA-Y-ORIENTACIONES.pdf
  16. Mieles-Barrera M. D. & Tonon G. (2015). Children’s quality of life in the Caribbean: A qualitative study. In: Tonon G. (eds) Qualitative studies in quality of life. Social Indicators Research Series 55 (pp 121–148). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  17. Mieles-Barrera, M. D., Tonon, G., & Alvarado, S. V. (2012). Investigación cualitativa: el análisis temático para el tratamiento de la Información desde la fenomenología social. Universitas Humanística, 74, 195–225.Google Scholar
  18. Oyanedel, J., Alfaro, J., Varela, J., & Torre, J. (2014). Qué afecta el bienestar subjetivo y la calidad de vida de las niñas y niños chilenos?: Resultados de la Encuesta de bienestar subjetivo infantil. Santiago: LOM ediciones.Google Scholar
  19. Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25–39.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4127633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prilleltensky, I., Dokecki, P., Frieden, G., & Wang, V. (2013). Counseling for wellness and justice: Foundations and ethical dilemmas. In D. Aldarondo (Ed.), Advancing social justice through clinical practice (pp. 43–67). New York: Routdlege.Google Scholar
  21. Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(5), 583–630.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9110-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramírez, L., Monreal, V., Urzúa, G., & Valdebenito, F. (2017). Cultural meanings that mediate life satisfaction in Chilean children and adolescents. In J. C. Sarriera & L. M. Bedin (Eds.), Psychosocial well-being of children and adolescents in Latin America: Evidence-based interventions (pp. 129–151). Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55601-7_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramírez-Casas del Valle, L., & Alfaro-Inzunza, J. (2018). Discursos de los niños y niñas acerca de su bienestar en la escuela. [Children's discourses about their well-being at school]. Psicoperspectivas, 17(2).  https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol17-issue2-fulltext-1164.
  24. Ruiz-Olabuénaga, J. L. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.Google Scholar
  25. Sarriera, J. C. (2015). El bienestar sociocomunitario: Bases conceptuales y de investigación. En. E. Saforcada, J. Castellá, & J. Alfaro (Eds.). Salud comunitaria desde la perspectiva de sus protagonistas: La comunidad (pp. 57–81). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nuevos Tiempos.Google Scholar
  26. Sarriera, J. C., & Bedin, L. M. (2015). Towards a socio-community model: A well-being approach. Universitas Psychologica, 14(4), 1387–1398.  https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-4.tscm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seligson, J., Huebner, E., & Valois, R. (2003). Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 121–145.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021326822957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seligson, J., Huebner, E., & Valois, R. (2005). An investigation of a brief life satisfaction scale with elementary school children. Social Indicators Research, 73(3), 355–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-2011-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sepúlveda, A., Santibañez, D., Díaz, D., Contreras, N., Valverde, F., & Cortés, A. (2015). Infancia Cuenta en Chile 2015 (1st ed.). Santiago: Observatorio Niñez y Adolescencia Recuperado de http://www.xn-observatorioniez-kub.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Informe_Infancia_Cuenta_Chile2015_Web2.pdf.Google Scholar
  30. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). Does life satisfaction moderate the effects of stressful life events on psychopathological behavior during adolescence? School Psychology Quarterly, 19(2), 93–105.  https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.19.2.93.33313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thoilliez, B. (2011). How to grow up happy: An exploratory study on the meaning of happiness from Children’s voices. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 323–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9107-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tonon G. (2015). Relevance of the use of qualitative methods in the study of quality of life. In: Tonon G. (eds) Qualitative studies in quality of life. Social Indicators Research Series 55 (pp 3–22). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  33. Torres, O. (2015). Los nuevos Bárbaros. Institucionalidad y Estado: niñez y derechos. In M. Mendoza & R. Ferrer [Coord.]. Del Buen Salvaje al Ciudadano: la idea de infancia en la historia (1st ed.). Santiago: Ediciones JUNJI.Google Scholar
  34. Valois, R., Zullig, K., Huebner, E., & Drane, J. (2004). Physical activity behaviors and perceived life satisfaction among public high school adolescents. Journal of School Health, 74(2), 59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb04201.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valois, R., Zullig, K., Huebner, E., & Drane, J. (2009). Youth developmental assets and perceived life satisfaction: Is there a relationship? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(4), 315–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9083-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vasilachis, I. (2006). Estrategias de Investigación Cualitativa. Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial.Google Scholar
  37. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1/3), 33–46.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015723614574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zullig, K. J., Valois, R. F., Huebner, E. S., Oeltmann, J. E., & Drane, J. W. (2001). Relationship between perceived life satisfaction and adolescents’ substance abuse. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29(4), 279–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00269-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversidad del DesarolloSantiagoChile
  2. 2.School of Psychology and the Center for Research in Inclusive Education, Chile School of PsychologyPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Universidad Central de ChileValparaísoChile

Personalised recommendations