Advertisement

Child Indicators Research

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 187–211 | Cite as

Are Spanish Children Taking Advantage of their Weekly Classroom Time?

  • Luis Alejandro Lopez–AgudoEmail author
  • Oscar Marcenaro–Gutierrez
Article

Abstract

There is a common belief in Spain that a large amount of classroom time is supposed to be an indicator of better academic achievement, due to children’s prolonged exposure to the teaching-learning process. Nevertheless, international evidence does not seem to support this concept, as the amount of weekly instruction hours that children receive in Spain is well above the one provided in other countries, which clearly perform better than Spain in international assessments. Because of that, this current research proposes to analyse two issues regarding weekly instruction time: firstly, whether or not instruction time per week affects the academic achievement of Spanish children; secondly, if this potential effect differs across Spanish regions –Autonomous Communities–. In order to do that, we have made use of student fixed effects between-subjects to obtain the potential causal effect of weekly instruction time on students’ academic achievement. The main results of this analysis have indicated that, in general for Spain, weekly instruction time does not seem to affect children’s academic achievement. However, this lack of influence may reflect the compensation of different effects of instruction time per week on students’ academic achievement for some Spanish Autonomous Communities –concretely, Catalonia, Navarra and the Basque Country–. In the view of these results, we propose some policy interventions. We also highlight the importance of studying each country’s particular case in respect to this instruction time issue, as it may present different effects in each country.

Keywords

Weekly instruction time Indicators of academic achievement Spanish regions Secondary education Student fixed effects 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly supported by the Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa de la Junta de Andalucía (PAI group SEJ-532 and Excellence research group SEJ-2727); by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Research Project ECO2014-56397-P) and the FPU scholarship of the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FPU2014 04518). Luis Alejandro Lopez-Agudo also acknowledges the training received from the University of Malaga PhD Programme in Economy and Business [Programa de Doctorado en Economía y Empresa de la Universidad de Malaga].

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersen, S. C., Humlum, M. K., & Nandrup, A. B. (2016). Increasing instruction time in school does increase learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(27), 7481–7484.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516686113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, D. P., Fabrega, R., Galindo, C., & Mishook, J. (2004). Instructional time and national achievement: Cross-national evidence. Prospects, 34(3), 311–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-004-5310-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belle, D. (1999). The After-school Lives of Children: Alone and With Others While Parents Work. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. BOE (2006). Organic Law 2/2006, 3rd May, of Education (LOE). N° 106, 4th May 2006, 17158–17207. Spain.Google Scholar
  5. BOE (2013). Organic Law 8/2013, 9th December, for the improvement of the education quality (LOMCE). N° 295, 10th December 2013, 97858–97921. Spain.Google Scholar
  6. BOJA (2016). Order 111/2016, 14th June. N° 122, 28th June 2016, 27–45. Andalusia.Google Scholar
  7. BON (2015). Order 24/2015, 22nd April. N° 127, 2nd July 2015, 1–149. Navarre.Google Scholar
  8. BOPV (2016). Order 236/2015, 22nd December. N° 9, 15th January 2016, 1–279. Basque Country.Google Scholar
  9. Bunce, D. M., Flens, E. A., & Neiles, K. Y. (2010). How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1438–1443.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100409p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cattaneo, M. A., Oggenfuss, C., & Wolter, S. C. (2017). The more, the better? The impact of instructional time on student performance. Education Economics, 25(5), 433–445.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1315055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DOGC (2015). Order 187/2015, 25th August. N° 6945, 28th August 2015. 29th august 2015. Catalonia.Google Scholar
  12. Doncel, D. (2014). Curricular organization of collective identities in Spain. Revista de Educación, 366, 12–42.  https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2014-366-273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 204–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. García-Pérez, J. I., Hidalgo-Hidalgo, M., & Robles-Zurita, J. A. (2014). Does grade retention affect students’ achievement? Some evidence from PISA. Applied Economics, 46(12), 1373–1392.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.872761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gobierno de Navarra (2016). PISA 2015. Avance de resultados. Pamplona, Spain: Departamento de Educación. Sección de Evaluación y Calidad.Google Scholar
  16. Gromada, A., & Shewbridge, C. (2016). Student Learning Time: A Literature Review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 127. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm409kqqkjh-en.
  17. Hanushek, E. A. (2010). Education production functions: Developed countries evidence. In D. J. Brewer & P. J. McEwan (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 132–136). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Hille, A., & Schupp, J. (2015). How learning a musical instrument affects the development of skills. Economics of Education Review, 44, 56–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. INE (2017). Encuesta de condiciones de vida. http://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=9963&L=0 (last accessed: June 2017).
  20. Lavy, V. (2015). Do differences in schools’ instruction time explain international achievement gaps? Evidence from developed and developing countries. The Economic Journal, 125, F397–F424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lipscomb, S. (2007). Secondary school extracurricular involvement and academic achievement: A fixed effects approach. Economics of Education Review, 26, 463–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCammon, L. A., Saldaña, J., Hines, A., & Omasta, M. (2012). Lifelong impact: Adult perceptions of their high school speech and/or theatre participation. Youth Theatre Journal, 26, 2), 2–2),25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2012.678223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MECD (2009). Sistema estatal de indicadores de la educación. Edición 2009. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
  24. Metzler, J., & Woessmann, L. (2012). The impact of teacher subject knowledge on student achievement: Evidence from within-teacher within-student variation. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 486–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  26. OECD (2009). PISA Data Analysis Manual. SPSS Second Edition. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2011). Quality Time for Students: Learning In and Out of School. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264087057-en.
  28. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (volume IV). PISA, OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201156-en.
  29. OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Technical Report. PISA, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. OECD (2015). Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en.
  31. OECD (2016a). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.
  32. OECD (2016b). PISA 2015 Technical Report. PISA, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. OECD (2016c). PISA 2015 Technical Standards. PISA, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2010). Extending the school day or school year. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401–436.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rivkin, S. G., & Schiman, J. C. (2015). Instruction time, classroom quality, and academic achievement. The Economic Journal, 125, F425–F448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walberg, H. J., Niemiec, R. P., & Frederick, W. C. (1994). Productive curriculum time. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(3), 86–100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569409538779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woessmann, L. (2010). Institutional determinants of school efficiency and equity: German states as a microcosm for OECD countries. Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik), 230(2), 234–270.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2010-0206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Departamento de Economía Aplicada (Estadística y Econometría) and Programa de doctorado en Economía y EmpresaUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Departamento de Economía Aplicada (Estadística y Econometría)Universidad de MálagaMálagaSpain

Personalised recommendations