Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Adapted for Children Ages 8–12
Research on self-compassion in adults and adolescents has consistently shown positive associations of self-compassion to mindfulness, psychological and physical well-being, self-esteem, and compassion towards others. Yet, self-compassion in children has not been examined. The present study was conducted to explore the reliability and validity of the Self-Compassion Scale for Children (SCS-C). A sample of 406 children, ages 8 to 12, completed the SCS-C and measures of mindfulness, self-concept, well-being and psychological adjustment, empathic-related responding, and prosocial goals. Results indicated a two-factor structure for the SCS-C with negatively-worded items and positively-worded items forming two discrete subscales, each with acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .81–.83). Children’s scores on the positive and negative self-compassion subscales were significantly related to most of the self-reported measures in the expected directions. These findings provide insight into the factor structure of the SCS-C and are consistent with previous research on the Self-Compassion Scale with adult and adolescent populations. Limitations and future directions are discussed with regard to the two-factor structure of the SCS-C and its relevance for research and applications.
KeywordsSelf-compassion Children Mindfulness Well-being Measurement
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was funded by the University of British Columbia’s Hampton Research Fund and the Mind and Life Institute’s Francisco Varela Award.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Benn, R. (2004). Modified mindful attention awareness scale. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
- Benson, J., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The impact of item phrasing on the validity of attitude scales for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 231–240.Google Scholar
- Bergen-Cico, D., & Cheon, S. (2013). The mediating effects of mindfulness and self-compassion on trait anxiety. Mindfulness, 4, 505–519.Google Scholar
- Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2015). Validation of the psychometric properties of the self-compassion scale. Testing the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1974.
- Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 404–434). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, M., & Lengua, L. (1995). Scale construction for the Seattle Personality Inventory. (fast track project technical report). Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (2006). The self. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 505–570). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 144–156.Google Scholar
- Kusche, C. A., Greenberg, M. T., & Beilke, R. (1988). Seattle personality questionnaire for young school-aged children. University of Washington, Department of Psychology: Unpublished personality questionnaire. Seattle.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W. (1988). The self-Description questionnaire (SDQ): A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self-Description questionnaire II manual. Campbelltown: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
- McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2016). Protection or vulnerability? A Meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and pychopathology. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.Google Scholar
- Rains, C. (2003). Seattle personality questionnaire-original. (fast track project technical report). http://www.fasttrackproject.org/. Accessed 9 Sept 2007.
- Song, M. (2003). Two studies on the resilience inventory (RI): Toward the goal of creating a culturally sensitive measure of adolescent resilience. Dissertation abstracts international, 64 (8B). (UMI no. 3100166) Harvard: ProQuest information and learning.Google Scholar
- Welp, L. R., & Brown, C. M. (2014). Self-compassion, empathy, and helping intentions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 54–65.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A., Byrnes, J. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Development during early and middle adolescence. In P. A. Lexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 87–113). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ye, F., & Wallace, T. L. (2013). Psychological sense of school membership scale: Method effects associated with negatively worded items. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 3, 202–215.Google Scholar
- Zessin, U., Dickhauser, O., & Garbade, S. (2015). The relationship between self-compassion and well-being: A meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7, 340–364.Google Scholar