Child Indicators Research

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 649–672 | Cite as

Chilean Children’s Perspectives on Their Parents’ Work and Family Conflicts, Tensions, and Reconciliations: Preliminary Gender Analysis

  • Ana Kinkead
  • Mahia Saracostti
  • María O. Grau
  • Pamela Caro
Article

Abstract

Tensions and reconciliations between work and family are analyzed from Chilean children’s perspectives considering that: 1) The quality of family relationship is key to socio-emotional development; 2) The impact on the lives of the children is undeniable due to the link between economic and emotional dependence; 3) Most studies dedicate special attention to those aspects which affect parents and working organizations, with little focus on the children; and, 4) Results regarding the impact of tensions on children’s development and the quality of their upbringing are contradictory. An adapted Ask the children survey was applied to a purposive sample of 955 children (M age  = 13.2, 51 % male). Results show a favorable appraisal of parental competences and time spent together. Work interferences in parent–child relationship encompass the affective sphere (mothers) and communicative area (fathers). Boys would like to work more than their parents did, whereas girls would like to work less than them. Nevertheless, both boys and girls would like to work more than their mothers did. Regarding the worst aspects of having working parents, children reported that is seeing them exhausted and stressed. Still, tensions and conflicts are not perceived dramatically by the children, probably due to some sort of loyalties within the family and the recognition to the efforts related to being absent for long periods of time in behalf family wellbeing. Differences by gender of children and parents are consistent with international evidence. Finally, the discussion of this study encompasses the implications of the conciliation strategies and public and private policies implemented.

Keywords

Work-family conflicts Working parents Chilean children’s perspective Gender differences 

References

  1. Anderson, P., & Butcher, K. (2006). Reading, writing and refreshments: do school finances contribute to childhood obesity? Journal of Human Resources, 41, 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranda, R., & De Andrés, C. (2004). La organización de la atención temprana en la educación infantil. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 9, 217–246.Google Scholar
  3. Arriagada, I. (2005). Políticas hacia la familia, protección e inclusión social. Santiago: Serie de Seminarios y Conferencias N° 45.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Institute of Family Studies. (2001). Family and work: The family perspective. Australia: Department of Families, Community Affairs and Indigenous People.Google Scholar
  5. Ayala, M. (2013). Panorama actual en Chile: Sello de Certificación Iguala Conciliación. Santiago: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (SERNAM).Google Scholar
  6. Ayalong, L. (2004). Cultural variants of caregiving or the culture of caregiving. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 11, 131–138.Google Scholar
  7. Aylwin, N., & Solar, M. (2002). Trabajo social familiar. Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, R., & Gareis, K. (2007). Shift work, parenting behaviors, and children’s socio-emotional well-being a within-family study. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 727–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D., & Lewis, C. (2000). Effects of the child development project on students drug use and other problem behaviors. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 75–99. doi: 10.1037/1522-3736.4.1.43c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belle, D. (1999). The after school lives of children: Alone and with others while parents work. Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (2007). El género en disputa. El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, D., Kacmar, M., Wayne, J., & Grzywacz, J. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chavkin, N., & Williams, D. (1993). Minority parents and the elementary school: Attitudes and practices. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 73–83). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chinchilla, N., & León, C. (2004). La ambición femenina: cómo re-conciliar trabajo y familia. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Aguilar.Google Scholar
  15. Corsaro, W. (1997). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Crouter, C., & Bumpus, M. (2001). Linking parents’ work stress to children and adolescents’ psychological adjustment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 156–159. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daly, K. (1996). Families and time: Keeping pace in a married culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Jong, E., Basso, R., & Paira, M. (2001). La Familia en los albores del nuevo milenio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Espacio.Google Scholar
  19. De Souza Santos, B. (1998). De la mano de Alicia. Lo social y lo político en la postmodernidad. Buenos Aires: Siglo del Hombre Editores.Google Scholar
  20. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2009). Statistical yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Visited: Accessed 19 May 2012.Google Scholar
  21. Elliot, M., Roizen, J., Rubin, V., & Buckley, S. (1982). The serious business of growing up: A study of children’s live outside school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Endendijk, J., Groeneveld, M., van Berkel, S., Hallers-Haalboom, E., Mesman, J., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, J. (2013). Gender stereotypes in the family context: mothers, fathers, and siblings. Sex Roles, 68, 577–590. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0265-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Entricht, T., Hughes, J., & Tovey, H. (2007). Relationships among work and family conflict, stress, and parenthood in dual-income couples. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 12, 116–121.Google Scholar
  24. Erikson, E. (2000). El ciclo vital completado. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
  25. Faur, E. (2006). Género, masculinidades y políticas de conciliación familia-trabajo. Nómadas, 24, 130–141.Google Scholar
  26. Fiese, B., Tomcho, T., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 381–390. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.16.4.381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forste, R., & Fox, K. (2002). Household labor, gender roles, and family satisfaction: a cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 613–631.Google Scholar
  28. Franke, T., & Lynch, S. (2006). Linking school social work interventions to educational outcomes for schools. The School Services Sourcebook: A guide for school-based professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Galinsky, E. (1999). Ask the children: What America’s children really think about working parents. New York: William Morrow and Co.Google Scholar
  30. Greenhaus, J., & Beutell, N. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88. doi: 10.2307/258214.Google Scholar
  31. Guendouzi, J. (2006). “The guilt thing”: balancing domestic and professional roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 901–909. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00303.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hargis, M., Kotrba, L., Zhdanova, L., & Baltes, B. (2011). What is really important: examining the relative importance of antecedents to work-family conflict. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23, 386–408.Google Scholar
  33. Henderson, A., & Mapp, K. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
  34. Henry, C. (1994). Family system characteristics, parental behaviors, and adolescent family life satisfaction. Family Relations, 43, 447–455. doi: 10.2307/585377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill, E., Yang, C., Hawkins, A., & Ferris, M. (2004). A cross- cultural test of the work-family interface in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1300–1316. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00094.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). (2011). Situación laboral de las mujeres ocupadas y las brechas salariales que inciden en la estructura ocupacional chilena. Santiago: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, Departamento de Estudios Laborales – Departamento de Estudios Sociales.Google Scholar
  37. Jiménez, A., & Moyano, E. (2008). Factores laborales de equilibrio entre trabajo y familia: Medios para mejorar la calidad de vida. Universum, 1, 116–133. doi: 10.4067/s0718-23762008000100007.Google Scholar
  38. Jiménez, A., Concha, M., & Zúñiga, R. (2012). Conflicto trabajo-familia, autoeficacia parental y estilos parentales percibidos en padres y madres de la Ciudad de Talca, Chile. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15, 57–65.Google Scholar
  39. Kabber, N. (2012). Empowerment, citizenship and gender justice: a contribution to locally grounded theories of change in women’s lives. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(3), 216–232. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2012.704055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kinkead, A., Saracostti, M., Grau, M., Caro, P., & Muñoz, C. (2015). Ask the children: Adaptación y validación preliminar en la población infantil de Chile. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  41. Köhlberg, L. (1999). La educación moral. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  42. Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. (2008). Time, work, and family life: reconceptualizing gendered time patterns through the case of children’s organized activities. Sociological Forum, 23, 419–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, J., & Phillips, S. (2006). Work and family: can you have it all? Psychologist-Manager Journal, 9, 41–57. doi: 10.1207/s15503461tpmj0901_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis, J., Noden, P., & Sarre, S. (2008). Parents’ working hours: adolescent children’s views and experiences. Children and Society, 22, 429–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00124.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lilly, T. (1999). Finding fresh angles of vision. An interview with Barrie Thorne. Work Family Researchers, Electronic Network, 1(2). Visited: https://workfamily.sas.upenn.edu/sites/workfamily.sas.upenn.edu/files/imported/archive/networknews/TNN1-2.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2012.
  46. Luk, D., & Shaffer, M. (2005). Work and family domain stressors and support: Within- and cross-domain influences on work-family conflict. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 78(489–508). doi: 10.1348/096317905X26741.
  47. MacDougall, C., Schiller, W., & Darbyshire, P. (2004). We have to live in the future. Early Child Development and Care, 174, 369–387. doi: 10.1080/0300443032000153426.
  48. Marín, M., Infante, E., & Rivero, M. (2002). Presiones internas del ámbito laboral y/o familiar como antecedentes del conflicto trabajo-familia. Revista de Psicología Social, 16, 46–57. doi: 10.1174/021347402753408695.Google Scholar
  49. Martínez, P., Carrasco, M., Aza, G., Blanco, Á., & Espinar, I. (2011). Family gender role and guilt in Spanish dual-earner families. Sex Roles, 65, 813–826. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0031-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mauno, S., Kinnunnen, U., & Rantanen, M. (2011). Work-family conflict and enrichment and perceived health: does type of family matter? Family Science, 2, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/19424620.2011.585908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Medved, C. (2004). The everyday accomplishment of work and family: exploring practical actions in daily routines. Communication Studies, 55, 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moreno, L. (2003). Ciudadanía, desigualdad social y Estado de Bienestar. Madrid: Unidad de Políticas Comparadas (CSIC).Google Scholar
  53. Mortazavi, S., Pedhiwala, N., Shafiro, M., & Hammer, L. (2009). Work-family conflict related to culture and gender. Community, Work and Family, 12, 251–273. doi: 10.1080/13668800902779023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nasurdin, A., & O’Driscoll, M. (2012). Work overload, parental demand, perceived organizational support, family support, and work-family conflict among New Zealand and Malaysia Academics. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 41, 38–48.Google Scholar
  55. National Women's Service (Servicio Nacional de la Mujer [SERNAM]). (2003). Análisis de los costos y beneficios de implementar medidas de conciliación vida laboral y familiar en la empresa. Documento de Trabajo N° 84. SERNAM, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  56. Oppenheimer, L. (1987). Cognition and social variables in the plan of action. In S. Freidman, E. Kafsky-Scholnick, & R. Cocking (Eds.), Blueprints for thinking: The role of planning in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Otálora, G. (2007). La relación existente entre el conflicto trabajo-familia y el estrés individual en dos organizaciones colombianas. Cuadernos de Administración, 20, 139–160.Google Scholar
  58. Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R., & Crouter, A. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 981–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00981.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Piaget, J. (2002). Psicología del niño. Madrid: Morata.Google Scholar
  60. Polatnick, M. (2002). Quantity time: Do children want more time with their full-time employed parents? Berkeley: Center for Working Families, University of California.Google Scholar
  61. Reininger, T. (2014). Parental involvement in municipal schools in Chile: Why do parents choose to get involved? PhD thesis in Social Work. Fordham University.Google Scholar
  62. Rojas, C. (2004). ¿Cómo afrontar desde la política pública la tensión trabajo v/s atención de los hijos pequeños? Foco N° 34. Santiago: Expansiva.Google Scholar
  63. Romich, J. (2007). Sharing the work: Mother Child relationships and household management. Journal of early adolescence, 27, 192–222. doi: 10.1177/0272431606294837.
  64. Rubin, G. (1998). El tráfico de mujeres: notas sobre la economía política del sexo. In M. Navarro, & C. Stimpson (comp.), ¿Qué son los estudios de mujeres? (Vol. VIII). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  65. Salazar, G. (2007). Ser niño “huacho” en la historia de Chile (Siglo XIX). Santiago: LOM Ediciones.Google Scholar
  66. Salinas, R. (2001). Revista de historia social y de las mentalidades: Infancia y sociedad en Chile Tradicional. 5ª Ed. Chile: Ediciones Seminario.Google Scholar
  67. Schkolnik, M. (2004). ¿Por qué es tan increíblemente baja la tasa de participación de las mujeres en Chile? Serie En Foco N° 33. Visited: http://www.expansiva.cl/media/en_foco/documentos/06102004132738.pdf .Accessed 20 Apr 2012.
  68. Shaffer, D. (2001). Psicología del desarrollo. Infancia y adolescencia. México: Thomson Editores.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, L. (1997). Jean Piaget. In N. Sheehy, A. Chapman, & W. Conroy (Eds.), Biographical dictionary of psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Solberg, A. (1997). Seeing children’s work. In N. Coninck-Smith, B. Sandin, & E. Schrumpf (Eds.), Industrious Children. Work and Childhood in the Nordic Countries 1850–1990 (pp. 186–210). Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Strazdins, L., Clements, M., Korda, R., Broom, D., & D’Souza, R. (2006). Unsociable work? Nonstandard work schedules, family relationships, and children’s well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 394–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00260.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ten Brummelhuis, L., Haar, J., & Van der Lippe, T. (2010). Crossover of distress due to work and family demands in dual-earner couples: a dyadic analysis. Work and Stress, 24, 324–341. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2010.533553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tironi, E., Valenzuela, J., & Scully, T. (2006). El eslabón perdido: Familia, modernización y bienestar en Chile. Introducción: Familia en Chile, los impactos de la modernización. Santiago: Editorial Taurus.Google Scholar
  74. Undurraga, R. (2013). Mujer y trabajo en Chile: ¿qué dicen las mujeres sobre su participación en el mercado laboral? In C. Mora (Ed.), Desigualdad en Chile: La continua relevancia del género. Santiago: Ediciones UAH.Google Scholar
  75. Vigotsky, L. S. (1984) El Problema de la edad. In Problemas de la Psicología Infantil. Chap. 5. Moscú: Editorial Pedagógica. (material on magnetic media).Google Scholar
  76. Vincent, C., & Neis, B. (2011). Work and family life: parental work schedules and child academic achievement. Community, Work and Family, 14, 449–468. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2010.535664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhao, J., Settles, B., & Sheng, X. (2011). Family-to-work conflict: gender, equity and workplace policies. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42, 723–738.Google Scholar
  78. Zvonkovic, A., Solomon, C., Humble, A., & Manoogian, M. (2005). Family, work and relationships: lessons from families of men whose jobs require travel. Family Relations, 54, 411–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00327.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Kinkead
    • 1
  • Mahia Saracostti
    • 2
  • María O. Grau
    • 3
  • Pamela Caro
    • 4
  1. 1.Universidad Autónoma de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Universidad de la FronteraTemucoChile
  3. 3.Universidad Central de ChileSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Universidad Santo TomásSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations