Advertisement

Child Indicators Research

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Ecological, Relationship-Based Model of Children’s Subjective Well-Being: Perspectives of 10-Year-Old Children in the United States and 10 Other Countries

  • Michael J. LawlerEmail author
  • Lisa A. Newland
  • Jarod T. Giger
  • Soonhee Roh
  • Barbara L. Brockevelt
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to further assess the international relevance of an ecological, relationship-based model of children’s subjective well-being with samples of 10-year-old children from the United States (n = 502, M age = 10.66, SD = .55) and 10 other countries: Algeria, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Israel, Nepal, Romania, Rwanda, South Korea, and Uganda (n = 502, M age = 10.12, SD = .48). All children completed the Children’s Worlds survey, which includes individual factors, contextual factors of home and family, life and neighborhood, school, and peers, and subjective well-being measures for life satisfaction, mental health, and self-image. The strongest predictors of children’s subjective well-being were family and peer relationships, school, and neighborhood quality. Findings support the international relevance of an ecological, relationship-based model of children’s subjective well-being.

Keywords

Childhood Well-being Ecological context Relationships International 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge contributions to the research project from Rita Humphrey and Tamara Olson.

References

  1. Ben-Arieh, A. (2010). Developing indicators for child well-being in a changing context. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 129–142). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Arieh, A. (2012). How do we measure and monitor the state of our children? Revisiting the topic in honor of Sheila B. Kamerman. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendayan, R., Blanca, M. J., Fernández-Baena, J. F., Escobar, M., & Trianes, V. M. (2013). New empirical evidence on the validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in early adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2004). Life satisfaction among European American, African American, Chinese American, Mexican American, and Dominican American adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(5), 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broberg, M. (2012). Young children’s well-being in Finnish stepfamilies. Early Child Development & Care, 182(3/4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brockevelt, B. L., Newland, L.A., & Lawler, M. J. (2015). Activities in an ecological, relationship-based model of children’s subjective well-being. Paper presented at the Exploring the Global Well-being of Children and Youth Conference, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187–249.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, B. K. (1985). The neighborhood walk: Sources of support in middle childhood. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Casas, F., Bălţătescu, S., Bertran, I., González, S., & Hatos, A. (2013). School satisfaction among adolescents: testing different indicators for its measurement and its relationship with overall life satisfaction and subjective well-being in Romania and Spain. Social Indicators Research, 111(3), 665–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassity, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Children’s Worlds. (2011). International survey of children’s well-being. Retrieved from http://childrensworlds.org/.
  12. Coyl, D. D., Newland, L. A., & Freeman, H. S. (2010). Predicting preschoolers’ attachment security from parenting behaviors, parents’ attachment relationships and their use of social support. Early Child Development and Care, 180(4), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Del Giudice, M. (2015). Attachment in middle-childhood: An evolutionary-developmental perspective. In G. Bosmans & K. A. Kerns (Eds.), Attachment in middle childhood: Theoretical advances and new directions in an emerging field. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 148, 15–30.Google Scholar
  14. Dinisman, T., & Rees, G. (2014). Findings from the first wave of data collection. Children’s Worlds: International Survey of Children’s Well-Being. Retrieved from http://www.isciweb.org.
  15. Dinisman, T., Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2012). The subjective well-being of Spanish adolescents: variations according to different living arrangements. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2374–2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinisman, T., Zeira, Z., Sulimani-Aidan, Y., & Benbenishty, R. (2013). The subjective well-being of young people aging out of care. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1705–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinisman, T., Fernandes, L., & Main, G. (2015). Findings from the first wave of ISCWeB project: international perspectives on child subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 8, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goswami, H. (2012). Social relationships and children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107, 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goudena, P. P., & Vermande, M. M. (2002). A review of cross-cultural studies of observed peer interaction. Early Child Development & Care, 172(2), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamerman, S. B., Phipps, S., & Ben-Arieh, A. (Eds.). (2009). From child welfare to children well-being: An international perspective on knowledge in the service of making policy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Lagacé-Séguin, D. G., & Case, E. (2010). Extracurricular activity and parental involvement predict positive outcomes in elementary school children. Early Child Development & Care, 180(4), 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawler, M. J., Shaver, P. R., & Goodman, G. S. (2011). Toward relationship-based child welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawler, M. J., Sayfan, L., Goodman, G. S., Narr, R., & Cordon, I. M. (2014). Comprehensive residential education: a promising model for emerging adults in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawler, M. J., Newland, L. A., Giger, J. T., & Roh, S. (2016). Ecological, relationship-based model of 12-year-old children’s subjective well-being in the United States and ten other countries. Journal of Social Research & Policy (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Llosada-Gistau, J., Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2014). The subjective well-being of adolescents in residential care compared to that of the general population. Children and Youth Services Review, 52, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDougall, T. (2011). Mental health problems in childhood and adolescence. Nursing Standard, 26(14), 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2013). Self-esteem and life satisfaction in adolescents – gender and age as potential moderators. Quality of Life Research, 22, 2921–2928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montserrat, C., Dinisman, T., Bălţătescu, S., Gregoras, B. A., & Casas, F. (2015). The effect of critical changes and gender on adolescents’ subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 8, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newland, L. A., Giger, J. T., Lawler, M. J., Carr, E. R., Dykstra, E. A., & Roh, S. (2014). Subjective well-being for children in a rural community. Journal of Social Service Research, 40, 642–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newland, L. A., Lawler, M. J., Giger, J. T., Roh, S., & Carr, E. R. (2015). Predictors of children’s subjective well-being in rural communities of the United States. Child Indicators Research, 8, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Life satisfaction in early adolescence: personal, neighborhood, school, family, and peer influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(7), 889–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Proctor, C., Linley, P., & Maltby, J. (2010). Very happy youths: benefits of very high life satisfaction among adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Puroila, A., Estola, E., & Syrjälä, L. (2012). Having, loving, and being: children’s narrated well-being in Finnish day care centres. Early Child Development & Care, 182(3/4), 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rees, G., & Main, G. (2015). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 15 countries: An initial report on the Children’s Worlds Survey, 2013–14. Children’s Worlds. Retrieved from www.isciweb.org.
  36. Sarriera, J. C., Casas, F., Bedin, L., Abs, D., Strelhow, M. R., Gross-Manos, D., & Giger, J. (2015). Material resources and children’s subjective well-being in eight countries. Child Indicators Research, 8, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh, S., & Lal, R. (2012). A study of subjective well-being of adolescents in relation to big five factors of personality. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 7(1), 33–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Lawler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa A. Newland
    • 2
  • Jarod T. Giger
    • 3
  • Soonhee Roh
    • 4
  • Barbara L. Brockevelt
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Health SciencesUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  2. 2.Human Development and Educational PsychologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  3. 3.College of Social WorkUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Social WorkUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  5. 5.Department of Occupational TherapyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA

Personalised recommendations