Child Indicators Research

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 855–872 | Cite as

A Comparative Study on the Level of Realizing Children’s Rights: A Focus on Rich Countries

Article

Abstract

The primary purposes of the paper is to construct a children’s rights index (CRI) for measuring the level of realizing children’s rights in economically rich countries and to compare the level of children’s rights across economically rich countries. We use three domains to represent children’s rights in advanced countries in order to measure children’s rights: right to welfare, right to education, and right to health. Each domain is composed of three types of indicators: public efforts, basic needs fulfillment, and present condition. In a comparative analysis, we found variations in children’s rights between economically rich countries. We also found that the patterns of children’s rights are highly achieved in an advanced welfare state. The results suggest that economic inequality is important for realizing children’s rights while the ratification of a human rights treaty has a limited effect on children’s rights. We conclude that governmental efforts to create an equal society are key factors for realizing children’s rights. Therefore, countries need to develop plans to confront economic inequality in order to achieve improved children’s rights for the future.

Keywords

Comparative study Children’s rights Composite index 

References

  1. Archard, D. (2004). Children: Rights and childhood. Evanston: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Arieh, A. (2006). Is the study of the “state of our children” changing? Re-visiting after 5 years. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(7), 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, N. H., Andrews, A. B., Goerge, R. M., Lee, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, E. H., & Kim, M. (2009). International human rights law, global economic reforms, and child survival and development rights outcomes. Law & Society Review, 43(3), 455–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, J. (2014). Overview: Social policies and child well-being. In Handbook of child well-being (pp. 2921–2943): Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., Richardson, D. (2006). Comparing child wellbeing in OECD countries: Concepts and methods. Working Paper No. 2006–03. Florence.Google Scholar
  9. Britto, P. R., & Ulkuer, N. (2012). Child development in developing countries: child rights and policy implications. Child Development, 83(1), 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clery, E., Tsang, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). The children’s measurement framework: a new indicator-based tool for monitoring children’s equality and human rights. Child Indicators Research, 7(2), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ennew, J. (1998). Monitoring children’s rights: Indicators for children’s rights project. Childwatch International Research Network, Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, www.childwatch.uio.no/cwi/projects/indicators/monitoring/monitoring.html.
  12. Ennew, J., & Miljeteig, P. (1996). Indicators for children’s rights: progress report on a project. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 4, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism.Google Scholar
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. (2005). Children in the welfare state. A social investment approach.Google Scholar
  15. Gran, B. K. (2010). Comparing children’s rights: introducing the children’s rights index. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammad, S. H. (1999). The CRC: ‘words on paper’ or a reality for children? The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 7(3), 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hathaway, O. A. (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal, 1935–2042.Google Scholar
  18. HCCH (2014). Introduction HCCP. http://www.hcch.net. Accessed 30.11. 2014.
  19. Hodgkin, R., & Newell, P. (2002). Implementation handbook for the convention on the rights of the child (Vol. 1): United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Humanium (2013). Activity report 2013.Google Scholar
  21. Landman, T. (2005). Protecting human rights: A comparative study, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lansdown, G. (2001). Promoting children’s participation in democratic decision-making. Innocenti Insight.Google Scholar
  23. Lansdown, G. (2010). The realisation of children’s participation rights. A handbook of children and young people’s participation, 11.Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development. New York.Google Scholar
  25. Mekonen, Y. (2010). Measuring government performance in realising child rights and child wellbeing: the approach and indicators. Child Indicators Research, 3(2), 205–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD (2007). Health at a glance, OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD publishing.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2011a). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. OECD (2011b). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Reynaert, D., Bouverne-de-Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2009). A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood, 16(4), 518–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Selman, P. (2014). Intercountry adoption of children from Asia in the twenty-first century. Children’s Geographies (ahead-of-print), 1–16.Google Scholar
  31. Smolin, D. M. (2004). Two faces of intercountry adoption: the significance of the Indian adoption scandals. The Seton Hall Law Review, 35, 403.Google Scholar
  32. Stalford, H., Sax, H., & Drywood, E. (2009). Developing indicators for the protection, respect and promotion of the rights of the child in the European union. Summary Report European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.Google Scholar
  33. Theis, J. (2003). Rights-based monitoring and evaluation: A discussion paper. Save the Children, April.Google Scholar
  34. Thukral, E. G., & Thukral, P. (2011). India child rights index. In H. C. f. C. Rights (Ed.). New Deli: HAQ: Center for Child Rights.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, B. S. (1993). Contemporary problems in the theory of citizenship. Citizenship and social theory, 1–18.Google Scholar
  36. UNICEF (1989). Convention on the rights of the child.Google Scholar
  37. UNICEF (2002). UNICEF’s priorities for children 2002–2005.Google Scholar
  38. UNICEF. (2004). Summary report of the study on the impact of the implementation of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  39. UNICEF Office of Research (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview innocenti report card 11. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.Google Scholar
  40. UNICEF (2014a). Convention on the rights of the child. http://www.unicef.org/crc/. Accessed 26.11. 2014.
  41. UNICEF. (2014b). Is the world a better place for children? 25 years of the convention on the rights of the child. New York: Division of Communication, UNICEF.Google Scholar
  42. Veerman, P., & Levine, H. (2000). Implementing children’s rights on a local level: narrowing the gap between Geneva and the grassroots. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 8(4), 373–384.Google Scholar
  43. Wotipka, C. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2008). World society and human rights: an event history analysis of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. The global diffusion of markets and democracy, 303–343.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WelfareKorea National University of TransportationJeungpyeongSouth Korea
  2. 2.Social Welfare Research CenterSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations