Abstract
In this paper we make use of the 9-year-old wave of the Growing Up in Ireland study to analyse multidimensional deprivation in Ireland. The Alkire and Foster adjusted headcount ratio approach (AHR; Alkire and Foster, Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487, 2011a, Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 289–314, 2011b) applied here constitutes a significant improvement on union and intersection approaches and allows for the decomposition of multidimensional poverty in terms of dimensions and sub-groups. The approach involves a censoring of data such that deprivations count only for those above the specified multidimensional threshold leading to a stronger set of interrelationships between deprivation dimensions. Our analysis shows that the composition of the adjusted headcount ratio is influenced by a range of socio-economic factors. For less favoured socio-economic groups dimensions relating to material deprivation are disproportionately represented while for the more advantaged groups, those relating to behavioral and emotional issues and social interaction play a greater role. Notwithstanding such variation in composition, our analysis showed that the AHCR varied systematically across categories of household type, and the social class, education and age group of the Primary Caregiver. Furthermore, these variables combined in a cumulative manner. The most systematic variation was in relation to the headcount of those above the multidimensional threshold rather than intensity, conditional on being above that cut-off point. Without seeking to arbitrate on the relative value of composite indices versus disaggregated profiles, our analysis demonstrates that there is much to be gained from adopting an approach with clearly understood axiomatic properties. Doing so allows one to evaluate the consequences of the measurement strategy employed for the understanding of levels of multidimensional deprivation, the nature of such deprivation profiles and socioeconomic risk patterns. Ultimately it permits an informed assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the particular choices made.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is the standardised Drumcondra reading test for 9-year-olds.
References
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011a). Counting and multidimensional poverty. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011b). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 289–314.
Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative model to the Swedish model of welfare research’. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon.
Atkinson, A. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation; contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 51–65.
Bourgignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.
Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An index of child well-being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 133–177.
Citro, C. F., & Michael, R. (1995). Measuring poverty: A new approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Educational Research Centre. (2007). Drumcondra primary reading test – revised; levels 3–6 administration manual and technical manual. Dublin: Educational Research Centre, St Patricks College.
European Commission. (2004). A new partnership for cohesion. Convergence competitiveness cooperation. Third report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Economic Communities. (1985). On Specific Community Action to Combat Poverty (Council Decision of 19 December 1984) 85/8/EEC Official Journal of the EEC, 2/24.
Fahey, T., Kelithy, P., & Polek, E. (2012). Family relations and family well-being: A study of the families of nine-year-olds in Ireland. Dublin: Family Support Agency and University College.
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
Hanafin, S., Brooks, A., Carroll, E., Fitzgerald, E., Gabhainn, S. N., & Sixsmith, J. (2007). Achieving consensus in developing a national set of child well-being indicators. Social Indicators Research, 80, 79–104.
Lippman, L. H., Anderson Moore, K., & McIntosh, H. (2009). Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures and methodological issues (Innocenti Working Paper No.2009-21). Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
Mensah, F. K., & Hobcraft, J. (2008). Childhood deprivation, health and development: associations with adult health in the 1958 and 1970 British prospective birth cohort studies. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 599–606.
Murray, A., McCrory, C., Thornton, M., Williams, J., Quail, A., Swords, L., Doyle, E., & Harris, E. (2011). Growing Up in Ireland: Design, Instrumentation and Procedures for the Child Cohort. Technical Report No.1. Available online at http://www.growingup.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Technical_Reports/GUI_-_DIPR_09.02.2011.pdf. Accessed March 2013.
Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2007). On the multidimensionality of poverty and social exclusion. In J. Micklewright & S. Jenkins (Eds.), Poverty and inequality: New directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (2009). Doing better for children. Paris: OECD.
Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 235–248.
Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ringen, S. (1988). Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 17, 351–366.
Sanson, A., Mission, S., Hawkins, M. T., & Berthelsen, D. (2010). The development and validation of Australian indices of child development-part I: conceptualisation and development. Child Indicators Research, 3, 275–292.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon.
Tomlinson, M., & Walker, R. (2009). Coping with complexity: Child and adult poverty. London: Child Poverty Action Group.
Tomlinson, M., Walker, R., & Williams, G. (2008). The relationship between poverty and childhood well-being in Great Britain. Barnett Papers in Social Research 3/2008.
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Whelan, C. T., & Maître, B. (2012). Identifying childhood deprivation; how well do national indicators of poverty and deprivation perform? Economic & Social Review, 43, 251–272.
Acknowledgments
Growing Up in Ireland data have been funded by the Government of Ireland through the Department of Children and Youth Affairs; and have been collected under the Statistics Act, 1993, of the Central Statistics Office. The project has been designed and implemented by the joint ESRI-TCD Growing Up in Ireland Study Team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, J., Murray, A. & Whelan, C.T. Multi-Dimensional Deprivation Among 9-Year-Olds in Ireland: An Analysis of the Growing Up in Ireland Survey. Child Ind Res 7, 279–300 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9215-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9215-5