Advertisement

Child Indicators Research

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

International Variation in Child Subjective Well-Being

  • Andreas Klocke
  • Amy Clair
  • Jonathan Bradshaw
Article

Abstract

Does the subjective well-being of children vary between countries? How does it vary? What explains that variation? In the past the subjective well-being of children has been compared at country level using published data derived from comparable international surveys, most commonly the Health Behaviour of School-aged Children survey. The league tables of child well-being produced in this way are fairly consistent. Thus for example the Netherlands consistently comes top of the rankings of OECD countries. Why is this? How does the Netherlands achieve this? In seeking to explain these national rankings we tend to explore associations with other national league tables. Thus in the UNICEF Report Card 11 (RC11), country ranking on subjective well-being were compared with country rankings on more objective domains of well-being—material, health, education, housing and so on, all at a country level. In this paper we explore international variations in subjective well-being using individual level data from the HBSC 2009–10 survey. We use similar indicators of subjective well-being as were used in RC11. We establish that the components form a reliable index. The ranking of countries is very similar to that obtained at a country level. We also explore the distribution of subjective well-being. We then control for a number of factors associated with variations in subjective well-being at an individual level and, using linear regression with a country fixed effects model, establish whether national differences in subjective well-being are still sustained having taken into account these independent factors. There are some changes in the ranking of countries having taken account of, particularly, behavioural indicators such as bullying. A multilevel model, taking into account country and school level effects, shows that that the effects of child characteristics on subjective well-being vary across countries.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Life satisfaction International variations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The advice of Dr Mona Kanaan, Department of Health Sciences, University of York with the multilevel modelling is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Journal of Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, J., Martorano, B., Natali, L., & de Neubourg, C. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being in rich countries. Child Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s12187-013-9196-4 on-line first. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12187-013-9196-4.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2013.
  3. Casas, F. (2011). Subjective social indicators and child and adolescent well-being. Child Indicators Research, 4, 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummins, R. (2010). Subjective well-being, homeostatically protected mood and depression: a synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., et al. (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  6. Goswami, H. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being: socio-demographic characteristics and personality. Child Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s12187-013-9205-7. on line first.Google Scholar
  7. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Paterson, L., & Goldstein, H. (1991). New statistical methods for analysing social structures: an introduction to multilevel models. British Educational Research Journal, 17(4), 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rasbash, J. (2008). Multilevel structures and classifications. Centre for Multilevel Modelling Module 4. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/module-samples/4-concepts-sample.pdf (Accessed 24th May 2012).
  10. Sajaia, Z. (2007). FASTGINI: Stata module to calculate Gini coefficient with jackknife standard errors, available at: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s456814.
  11. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Stata Corp. (2009). Longitudinal-data/panel-data reference manual. Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.
  14. The Children’s Society. (2012). The good childhood report 2012: a review of our children’s well-being, http://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/sites/default/files/tcs/good_childhood_report_2012_final.pdf.
  15. UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries, Innocenti report card 7. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  16. UNICEF. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: a comparative overview, Innocenti report card 11. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Klocke
    • 1
    • 3
  • Amy Clair
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jonathan Bradshaw
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences Frankfurt am MainFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.University of YorkYorkUK
  3. 3.Social Policy Research UnitUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations