Advertisement

Child Indicators Research

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 321–344 | Cite as

Does Reading to Children Enhance their Educational Success?

Short- and Long-Term Effects of Reading to Children in Early Childhood on their Language Abilities, Reading Behavior and School Marks
  • Oliver KleinEmail author
  • Irena Kogan
Article

Abstract

Drawing on two unique German datasets, we explore the possible short- and long-term effects that reading aloud in early childhood has on children’s language abilities, their reading behavior, and their school marks in kindergarten and at the end of both primary and secondary school. By applying propensity score matching, we found a positive effect of reading on the language abilities of preschool children and of students at the end of primary school. Additionally, a high frequency of reading to children in early childhood positively affects their own reading behavior. However, differences in reading in early childhood appear to be unrelated to school marks in the subject of German language at the end of primary school. Furthermore, we found no long-term effects of reading among secondary school leavers. Overall, our results confirm positive immediate and mid-term effects, but hardly any long-term effects, of reading to children during their early childhood.

Keywords

Reading aloud Language abilities Reading behavior School marks Propensity score matching 

Notes

Acknowledgements

First and foremost, we would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for funding our research and the collection of the data used in this study. We would also like to express our heartfelt thanks to Michael Gebel, Clemens Kroneberg and Harald Beier for their helpful comments and advice on an earlier draft of the paper. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge the useful comments that we received when presenting the paper at the “Research on Family Demography and Children’s Lives: Future Directions and Infrastructures” conference in Stockholm. Finally we would like to thank the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: a case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, L., Scher, D., & Mackler, K. (1997). Home and family influences on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1998). Analyzing the development of individual differences in terms of Matthew effects in reading: results from a Dutch longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1373–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, B. (2010). Who profits most from early parental investments? The effects of activities inside and outside the family on german and Turkish children’s language development. Child Indicators Research, 3(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, K. K., Weigel, D. J., & Martin, S. S. (2002). Children’s acquisition of early literacy skills: examining family contributions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(3), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., McAdoo, H. P., & Coll, C. G. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States part I: variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development, 72(6), 1844–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bus, A. G., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read - a metaanalysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, L. (2006). Parental education, time in paid work and time with children: an Australian time-diary analysis. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crosnoe, R., Leventhal, T., Wirth, R. J., Pierce, K. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Family socioeconomic status and consistent environmental stimulation in early childhood. Child Development, 81(3), 972–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 738–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2006). Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 697–812). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Jong, P. F., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2001). Lasting effects of home literacy on reading achievement in school. Journal of School Psychology, 39(5), 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duursma, E., Augustyn, M., & Zuckerman, B. (2008). Reading aloud to children: the evidence. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 93(7), 554–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2005). First grade and educational attainment by age 22: a new story. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1458–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ermisch, J. (2008). Origins of social immobility and inequality: parenting and early child development. National Institute Economic Review, 205, 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, M. A., Shaw, D., & Bell, M. (2000). Home literacy activities and their influence on early literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Experimentale, 54(2), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forget-Dubois, N., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J. P., Perusse, D., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2009). Early child language mediates the relation between home environment and school readiness. Child Development, 80(3), 736–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frijters, J. C., Barron, R. W., & Brunello, M. (2000). Direct and mediated influences of home literacy and literacy interest on Prereaders’oral vocabular and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 466–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gangl, M. (2010). Causal inference in sociological research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffin, E. A., & Morrison, F. J. (1997). The unique contribution of home literacy environment to differences in early literacy skills. Early Child Development and Care, 127(1), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hood, M., Conlon, E., & Andrews, G. (2008). Preschool home literacy practices and children’s literacy development: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karrass, J., VanDeventer, M. C., & Braungart-Rieker, J. M. (2003). Predicting shared parent–child book reading in infancy. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(1), 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1994). Kaufman assessment battery for children K-ABC. Frankfurt: Swets Test Service.Google Scholar
  26. Kitterod, R. H. (2002). Mothers’ Housework and childcare: growing similarities or stable inequalities? Acta Sociologica, 45(2), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kloosterman, R., Notten, N., Tolsma, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2011). The effects of parental reading socialization and early school involvement on children’s academic performance: a panel study of primary school pupils in the Netherlands. [Article]. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 291–306. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: social class and childrearing in black families and white families. [Article; Proceedings Paper]. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776. doi: 10.2307/3088916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehmann, R. H., & Peek, R. (1997). Aspekte der Lernausgangslage von Schülerinnen und Schülern der fünften Klassen an Hamburger Schulen. Bericht über die Untersuchung im September 1996. Hamburg.Google Scholar
  30. Lehmann, R. H., Peek, R., Gänsfuß, R., & Husfeldt, V. (2002). Aspekte der Lernausgangslage und der Lernentwicklung – Klassenstufe 9. Hamburg: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittsuntersuchung in Hamburg.Google Scholar
  31. Leseman, P. P. M., & de Jong, P. F. (1998). Home literacy: opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leseman, P. P. M., & van den Boom, D. C. (1999). Effects of quantity and quality of home proximal processes on Dutch, Surinamese-Dutch and Turkish-Dutch Pre-schoolers’ cognitive development. Infant and Child Development, 8, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leseman, P. P. M., Scheele, A. F., Mayo, A. Y., & Messer, M. H. (2007). Home literacy as a special language environment to prepare children for school. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10(3), 334–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leyendecker, B., Jäkel, J., Kademoglu, S. O., & Yagmurlu, B. (2010). Parenting practices and pre-schoolers’ cognitive skills in Turkish immigrant and German families. Early Child Development and Care, iFirst Article, 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Melchers, P., & Preuß, U. (2001). Kaufman assessment battery for children: K-ABC, deutschsprachige Fassung. Leiden: PITS.Google Scholar
  36. Melhuish, E. C., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To Read or Not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure From Infancy to Early Adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, Advance online publication, 1–30.Google Scholar
  38. Morgan, S. L., & Harding, D. J. (2006). Matching estimators of causal effects - Prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(1), 3–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian-inference for causal effects - role of randomization. The Annals of Statistics, 6(1), 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rush, K. L. (1999). Caregiver-child interactions and early literacy development of preschool children from low-income environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saracho, O. N. (1997). Perspectives on family literacy. Early Child Development and Care, 127(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scarborough, H. S., & Dobrich, W. (1994). On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14(3), 245–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: a five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J. A., Thomas, E. M., & Daley, K. E. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(1), 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(3), 318–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading - some consequences of individual-differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Feeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872.Google Scholar
  52. Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 659–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yarosz, D. J., & Barnett, W. S. (2001). Who reads to young children?: identifying predictors of family reading activities. Reading Psychology, 22, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yeung, W. J., Sandberg, J. F., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Children’s time with fathers in intact families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 136–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zick, C. D., Bryant, W. K., & Osterbacka, E. (2001). Mothers’ employment, parental involvement, and the implications for intermediate child outcomes. Social Science Research, 30(1), 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MannheimMannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES)MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations