Child Indicators Research

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 587–608 | Cite as

Interpersonal Relations and Subjective Well-Being among Preadolescents in China

Article

Abstract

China’s one-child policy, industrialization and urbanization have implications for children’s interacting with parents, friends, and classmates as well as their well-being. Using a stratified random sample of 1,306 sixth-grade primary school children and their parents in Nanshan district, Shenzhen, this exploratory study measured the interactive structures at home, with friends, and in school in relation to their family backgrounds, subjective well-being, and school performance. Being the only child or having household registration in Shenzhen was associated with more time and financial investments from parents. Girls, only children, or children with household registration in Shenzhen interacted more with friends than their counterparts. Girls or children with siblings engaged more with classmates but household registration did not make a difference. Having controlled for demographic and family backgrounds, parent and classmate relation were both associated positively with children’s levels of satisfaction with their relationships with siblings, parents, and friends as well as subjective well-being. But only classmate relation, besides parent’s educational attainment, was positively associated with school performance.

Keywords

Interpersonal relation Child well-being Inequality China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Ray Forrest and Philip Ivanhoe and the two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments. Financial support from the City University of Hong Kong (Grant #7200154) is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks go to the Nanshan District Bureau of Education and DONG Jian for assisting the survey work.

References

  1. An, X.-H. (2005). Educational engagement, social capital and educational development in poor area. Education and Economy, 2005(4), 31–35.Google Scholar
  2. Arnon, S., Shamai, S., & Ilatov, Z. (2008). Socialization agents and activities of young adolescents. Adolescence, 43(170), 373–397.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, E., Burnet, K. L., & Vosper, J. (2006). Birth-order effects on facets of extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bian, Y. (2002). Chinese social stratification and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bian, Y., Breiger, R., Davis, D., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2005). Occupation, class, and social networks in Urban China*. Social Forces, 83(4), 1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bian, Y., Davis, D. S., & Wang, S. (2007). Family social capital in Urban China: A social network approach. In W. Tang & B. Holzner (Eds.), Social change in contemporary China (pp. 219–230). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  8. Black, S. E., & Morgan, D. P. (1999). Meet the new borrowers. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 5(3), 1.Google Scholar
  9. Black, S. E., & Strahan, P. E. (2002). Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S. (1987). Families and schools. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 32–38.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1991). Matching processes in the labor market. Acta Sociologica, 34(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The rational reconstruction of society: 1992 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujisawa, Y., Hamano, T., & Takegawa, S. (2009). Social capital and perceived health in Japan: An ecological and multilevel analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gatzeva, M. N., & The University of Chicago. (2008). Social capital and group homogeneity: Joint-liability lending in Thailand.Google Scholar
  17. Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (2002). Social capital: From definition to measurement. In C. Grootaert & T. Van Bastelaer (Eds.), Understanding and measuring social capital: A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grootaert, C., Van Bastelaer, T., & World Bank. (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital: A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, S., & Stanford University. (2007). Family background and life chances in urban China, 1950–1996.Google Scholar
  20. Huang, C. (2006). Where is my desk: Surveying educational experiences of children from migrant worker families. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.Google Scholar
  21. Jaeger, M. M., & Holm, A. (2007). Does parents’ economic, cultural, and social capital explain the social class effect on educational attainment in the Scandinavian mobility regime? Social Science Research, 36(2), 719–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kantarevic, J., & Mechoulan, S. (2006). Birth order, educational attainment, and earnings: An investigation using the PSID. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 755.Google Scholar
  23. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Glass, R. (1999). Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(8), 1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liang, Z., & Chen, Y. P. (2007). The educational consequences of migration for children in China. Social Science Research, 36(1), 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin, N., & Bian, Y. (1991). Getting ahead in Urban China. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin, N., Cook, K. S., & Burt, R. S. (2001). Social capital: Theory and research (sociology and economics). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. McDonald, S., Lin, N., & Ao, D. (2009). Networks of opportunity: Gender, race, and job leads. Social Problems, 56(3), 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ng, S. H., Chen, R., Chong, A. (2006). Social trust and its antecedent conditions in the development of social capital. The CIIF evaluation consortium report prepared for health, welfare and food bureau, HKSAR government. Hong Kong: Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, HKSAR Government.Google Scholar
  29. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Terry, T., & Huebner, E. S. (1995). The relationship between self-concept and life satisfaction in children. Social Indicators Research, 35(1), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, Y., & Fong, V. L. (2009). Little emperors and the 4:2:1 generation: China’s singletons. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(12), 1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2010). Children from migrant worker families integrating into city life (1st ed.). Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, H., & Yale University. (2007). Social capital and self-reported health in rural China.Google Scholar
  34. Wang, S., Davis, D., & Bian, Y. (2006). The uneven distribution of cultural capital: Book reading in Urban China. Modern China, 32(3), 315–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong, D., Leung, J., Law, C. K., Chui, E. (2006). Building social capital: A formative programme review of CIIF projects. The CIIF evaluation consortium report prepared for health, welfare and food bureau, HKSAR government. Hong Kong: Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, HKSAR Government.Google Scholar
  36. Xi, J., Sun, Y., & Xiao, J. (2006). Chinese youth in transition (the Chinese economy series). Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  37. Zhou, X., & Moen, P. (2001). Explaining life chances in china’s economic transformation: A life course approach. Social Science Research, 30(4), 552–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public and Social AdministrationCity University of Hong KongHong Kong SARPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Tsinghua Graduate School at ShenzhenTsinghua UniversityShenzhenChina
  3. 3.Department of Social SciencesHong Kong Institute of EducationNew TerritoriesHong Kong

Personalised recommendations