Finding the Right Balance Between Standardisation and Flexibility: A Compendium of Indicators for Measuring Child Well-Being
Understandings of child well-being are culturally embedded and highly contextualised. Its multifaceted nature, including dimensions of health, education, child social capital and psychosocial well-being, creates significant conceptual and methodological challenges for selection of standard indicators. This is particularly true for programmes that cover small areas where context is paramount in determining locally significant outcomes. Child focused International Non Governmental Organizations, such as World Vision, work in country contexts as different as Albania and Angola, with types of programmes ranging from advocacy to emergency, yet are seeking to report regionally and globally for advocacy and accountability purposes. How is it possible to measure context specific child well-being in such diverse situations? This article will present a compendium of indicators organized under a common set of child well-being outcomes. The compendium drew on globally recognized instruments such as MICS, literacy tests, and child self perception surveys to provide a wide selection of indicators. A three-step process for selecting indicators empowers programmers to choose indicators appropriate to their context. The compendium was piloted in Zambia with community-based programmers. The pilot had mixed results with programmers having some difficulty defining links between project activities and higher level outcomes. Refining the list of indicators to a manageable number was also a challenge. Questions were raised on the sequencing and use of focus group discussion. In conclusion, a compendium of indicators initially appears to be a workable solution for large organisations to measure well-being, but there is a requirement for specific capacity building for staff.
KeywordsChild well-being Indicators Multi-dimensional poverty Zambia Outcomes
- Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., Rees, G., & Goswami, H. (2009) Explaining variations in the subjective well-being of children—macro and micro approaches. Paper for the Social Policy Association Conference. http://www.crfr.ac.uk/spa2009/ Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Catholic Relief Service. (2009). OVC well-being tool. http://www.crsprogramquality.org/ovcwt/ovcwt.html Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Chapinhall, Centre for Children, University of Chicago. Multi-national project for monitoring and measuring children’s well-being. http://multinational-indicators.chapinhall.org/ Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Dawes, A., Bray, R., & van der Merwe, A. (eds) (2007). Core indicators for monitoring child well-being in South Africa. Save the Children Fund, Sweden. HSRC Press, South Africa. http://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/product.php?productid=2200 Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Demographic Health Survey. http://www.measuredhs.com/ Accessed 24 June 2010.
- EGRA/USAID. https://www.eddataglobal.org/documents/index.cfm?fuseaction=showdir&ruid=1&statusID=3 Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Indicator Registry, http://indicatorregistry.org Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Millennium Development Goal Indicators. United Nations. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Host.aspx?Content=Indicators/OfficialList.htm. Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Morrow, N. (ed) (2009). 2009 Child well-being: Africa regional pilot summary report. World Vision International. Not available online.Google Scholar
- Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. UNICEF. http://www.childinfo.org/ Accessed 24 June 2010.
- North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, K., Nyangara, F., Murphy, R., & Nyberg, B. (2007). Child Status Index. MEASURE Evaluation & Duke University, funded by PEPFAR/USAID. http://www.hciproject.org/node/1237 Accessed 24 June 2010.
- Rugh, J., Peschi, L., & Nkwake, A. (2008). TDI evaluation summary report. World Vision International. http://www.transformational-development.org/Ministry/TransDev2.nsf/maindocs/DBAFFD0DA4BD2E3E852574FA005EFBCA?opendocument Accessed 24 June 2010.
- SEARCH Institute. (2004). http://www.search-institute.org/survey-services/surveys/developmental-assets-profile.
- Simister, N. (2009). Developing M&E systems for complex organisations: a methodology. M&E paper 3, INTRAC.Google Scholar
- UNAIDS. Indicator Registry. http://www.indicatorregistry.org/ Accessed 24 June 2010.
- UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: an overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 7. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.Google Scholar
- Young Lives Project. http://www.younglives.org.uk Accessed 24 June 2010.