Children’s Development in Kindergarten: A Multilevel, Population-Based Analysis of ESL and Gender Effects on Socioeconomic Gradients
- 365 Downloads
Socioeconomic gradients for five school readiness domains were examined in multilevel analyses in relation to English-as-a-Second-Language status (comparing English-, Punjabi-, and Cantonese-speaking children) and gender, drawing from a population-based sample (n = 40,722) from British Columbia, Canada. School readiness ratings were obtained from the teacher-administered Early Development Instrument (EDI; Janus and Offord (Canadian journal of behavioural science 39: 1–22, 2007) and linked to enumeration area (6-digit postal code) level socioeconomic status census data. The findings show that (i) girls obtain consistently higher ratings on all developmental domains of the EDI than boys, (ii) the socioeconomic gradient for Punjabi-speaking children is significantly flatter than for English- and Cantonese-speaking children, and (iii) English-, Punjabi-, and Cantonese-speaking children obtain similar ratings on all developmental domains, except communication skills (in English), once analyses control for socioeconomic status. The findings are discussed with regard to cultural and ecological theories of development, and recommendations for the design and analyses of future research are provided.
KeywordsChild development Early Development Instrument (EDI) School readiness Socioeconomic gradients English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) Punjabi (South Asian) Cantonese (Asian) Gender differences
- Berliner, D. C. (2005). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record. Retrieved on November 10, 2007, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12106.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Development, Volume 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Canadian Council on Learning (2008, March). Lessons in learning. Understanding the academic trajectories of ESL students. Retrieved on March 15, 2009, from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/LessonsInLearning/Oct-02-08-Understanding-the-acedemic.pdf.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Garg, R., Levin, E., Urajnik, D., & Kauppi, C. (2005). Parenting style and academic achievement for East Indian and Canadian adolescents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36, 653–662.Google Scholar
- Graue, M. E. (1993). Ready for what? Constructing meanings of readiness for Kindergarten. Albany: State University of New York Pres.Google Scholar
- Guhn, M., Gadermann, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007a). Does the EDI measure school readiness in the same way across different groups of children? Early Education and Development, 18, 453–472.Google Scholar
- Guhn, M., Janus, M., & Hertzman, C. (2007b). The Early Development Instrument: Translating school readiness assessment into community actions and policy planning [Special Issue]. Early Education & Development, 18, 369–570.Google Scholar
- Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.Google Scholar
- Janus, M., Brinkman, S., Duku, E., Hertzman, C., Santos, R., Sayers, M., et al. (2007). The Early Development Instrument: A population-based measure for communities. A handbook on development, properties, and use. Hamilton, ON: Offord Centre for Child Studies. Retrieved on Nov 20, 2008, from http://www.offordcentre.com/readiness/pubs/2007_12_FINAL.EDI.HANDBOOK.pdf.
- Janus, M., & Offord, D. R. (2000). Readiness to learn at school. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 71–75.Google Scholar
- Janus, M., & Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Keating, D. P., & Hertzman, C. (eds). (1999). Developmental Health and Wealth of Nations. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Kershaw, P., Irwin, L., Trafford, K., & Hertzman, C. (2005). The British Columbia atlas of child development 1st ed (Vol. 40). Vancouver: Human Early Learning Partnership, Western Geographical Press.Google Scholar
- Kohen, D. E., Hertzman, C., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1998). Neighborhood influences on children’s school readiness. Hull: Human Resources Development Canada.Google Scholar
- Lapointe, V. R., Ford, L., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Examining the relationship between neighborhood environment and school readiness for Kindergarten children. Early Education and Development, 18, 473–495.Google Scholar
- McCain, M. N., & Mustard, J. F. (1999). Early Years Study: Reversing the Real Brain Drain. Toronto: Publications Ontario.Google Scholar
- Nosbush, L. (2006). Community report for children. The Understanding the Early Years final report. Prince Albert, SK: Saskatchewan Rivers School Division. Retrieved on November 20, 2007, from http://www.srsd119.ca/uey/.
- Willms, J. D. (2003). Ten hypotheses about socioeconomic gradients and community differences in children's developmental outcomes. Gatineau, QB: Human Resources Development Canada; ARB report, SP-560-01-03E.Google Scholar
- Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar