Child Indicators Research

, 2:391 | Cite as

Accentuating the Negative: The Mismatch Between Public Perception of Child Well-being and Official Statistics

  • Lina GuzmanEmail author
  • Laura Lippman
  • Kristin Anderson Moore
  • William O’Hare


This paper reports findings from a series of polls designed to ascertain how well the American public understands the circumstances, characteristics, and living conditions of American children. We compare poll responses to official statistics to assess the accuracy of the public’s perceptions. With few exceptions, the results suggest a large gap between the public’s perception of children and official statistics and highlight a second finding—primarily, where misperceptions exist the public tends to perceive children’s circumstances to be worse than they actually are. Bivariate and multivariate analyses indicate that there are small but significant group differences by education, gender, age and community type in the public’s understanding of child well-being. Our results also suggest that perceptions of children may be shaped in part by an individual’s environment and personal experiences. Possible contributors to this public gap in knowledge, implications for the dissemination of statistical information on children, and public policy are discussed.


Public perception Child well-being Statistical literacy Public policy 



We gratefully acknowledge research support from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. We thank Diane Colasanto for her advice in the development of questions. We also thank Julie Dombrowski for her computational assistance, as well as Andrew Rivers, Kristen Asmussen, Thomson Ling, and Kevin Cleveland for providing valuable technical support.


  1. Allen, J. P. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences (p. 1988). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1991). Improving doctor’s understanding of statistics. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 154, 223–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annie E Casey Foundation. (1999). Effective language for communicating children’s issues (published by the Coalition for America’s Children with the Benton Foundation, May).Google Scholar
  4. Applied Research Center at Georgia State University Poll. (1993). Storrs, Conn: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. June.Google Scholar
  5. Aubrun, A., & Grady, J. (2000). How Americans understand teens: Findings from cognitive interviews. In S. Bales (Ed.), Reframing youth issues. Washington, DC: Working Papers, Framework Institutute and Center for Communications and Community, UCLA.Google Scholar
  6. Bales, S. (2001). Reframing youth issues for public consideration and support. Washington, DC: Working Papers, Framework Institute and Center for Communications and Community, UCLA.Google Scholar
  7. Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., Brownell, K. D., & Schlesinger, M. (2009). Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about causes of obesity affect support for public policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 87, 7–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkley Media Studies Group. (1997). Children’s health in the news. Washington: Benton Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Blendon, R. J., Young, J. T., McCormick, M. C., Kropf, M., & Blair, J. (1998). American’s views on children’s health. JAMA, 280, 2122–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bostrom, M. (2000). The 21st century teen: Public perception and teen reality. In S. Bales (Ed.), Reframing youth issues. Washington, DC: Working Papers, Framework Institute and Center for Communications and Community, UCLA.Google Scholar
  11. Brady, H. E., & Orren, G. R. (1992). Polling pitfalls: Sources of error in public opinion surveys. In T. E. Mann & G. R. Orren (Eds.), Media polls in American politics. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  12. Brewer, P. R. (2003). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights: A framing- based account. Public Opinion Journal, 67(2), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnstein, P. (1998). Bringing the public back in: should sociologist consider the impact of public opinion in public policy? Social Forces, 77, 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, P., Kunkel, D., & Miller, P. (1999). The news media’s picture of children: A five year update and a focus on diversity. Oakland: Children Now.Google Scholar
  15. Child Trends. (2002). Public understanding of standard errors: A report to the kids count project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Child Trends Data Bank. (2006). Available online at
  17. Cohen, V. (1999). How to help reporters tell the truth. Paper presented at ASA-JSM, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Council for Marketing and Opinion Research. (2002). CMOR respondents cooperation audits: Preliminary results. Port Jefferson: CMOR.Google Scholar
  19. Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Navas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Mills, R. J. (2004). Income, poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2003. In Current Populations Reports. US Census Bureau: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, W. D., Finkelstein, E. A., Kamerow, D. B., & Renaud, J. M. (2005). Public perceptions of childhood obesity. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2002). “America’s children: Key national indicators of well-being. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2009). Births: Preliminary data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports 57 (12). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (1998). “Myth or fact? The real deal on teen sexuality.” Emerging Issues in Reproductive Health: A Briefing Series for Journalists.Google Scholar
  25. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2008). “The public on requiring individuals to have health insurance.”Google Scholar
  26. Institute for Social Research Poll. (1999). Storrs, Conn: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
  27. Johntson, L. D., Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (2006). Monitoring the future: Questionnaire responses form the nation’s high school seniors, 2005. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social research.Google Scholar
  28. Kasser, T. (2005). Frugality, generosity, materialism in children and adolescents. In K. A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 357–374). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaplowitz, S. A., Fisher, B. J., & Brown, C. L. (2003). How accurate are perceptions of social statistics about Blacks and Whites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. (2006). Gauging impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a National RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 759–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keintz-Knowles, K. E. (2000). Images of youth: A content analysis of adolescents in prime time entertainment programming. In S. Bales (Ed.), Reframing Youth Issues. Washington, DC: Working Papers, Framework Institute and Center for Communications and Community, UCLA.Google Scholar
  33. Kersh, R., & Monroe, J. (2005). Obesity, courts and the new politics of public health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30(5), 803–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krysan, M. (2002). Community undesirability in Black and White: examining racial residential preference through community perceptions. Social Problems, 49(4), 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preference of Blacks: do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80(3), 937–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kunkel, D. (1994). The news media’s picture of children. Oakland: Children Now.Google Scholar
  37. Louis Harris & Associates Poll. (1993). Storrs, Conn: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
  38. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  39. McCraight, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2008). Social Movement identity and belief systems: an examination of beliefs about environmental problems within the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 651–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, K. A. (1997). Criteria for indicators of child well-being. In R. Hauser, B. Brown & W. R. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Moaddel, M., Tessler, M., & Inglehart, R. (2008). Foreign occupation and national pride: the case of Iraq. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., & Levine, J. (1993). Innumeracy about minority populations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Hare, W. (2003). Perceptions and misperception about America’s children: The role of the print media. A KIDS COUNT Working Paper. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Available online at
  44. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Panagopoulos, C. (2006). The polls-trends: obesity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Papillo, A. R., Franzetta, K., Manlove, J., Moore, K. A., Terry-Humen, E., & Ryan, S. (2002). Facts at a glance. Washington: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  47. Parker, M. A., Miller, P., Donegan, K., & Gilliam, F. D. (2001). The local television news media’s picture of children. Oakland: Children Now.Google Scholar
  48. Agenda, P. (1999). Kids these days ’99: What Americans really think about the next generation. New York: Public Agenda.Google Scholar
  49. Reutter, L., Harrison, M. J., & Neufeld, A. (2002). Public support for poverty-related policies. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93(4), 297–302.Google Scholar
  50. Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Bartig, K., Struet, K., Moore, K. A., Lippman, L., et al. (2006). Keeping America’s promises to children and youth. Washington DC: Search Institute & Child Trends.Google Scholar
  51. Schield, M. (2000). Statistical literacy: Difficulties in describing and comparing rates and parentages. Paper presented at the Joint statistical Meeting of the American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  52. Schmidley, A. D. (2001). Profile of the foreign-born population in the United States: 2000. In Current Population Reports. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  53. Sigelman, L., & Niemi, R. G. (2001). Innumeracy about minority populations: African Americans and Whites compared. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. (2002). Prevalence of overweight among children and adolescents: United States, 1999–2000. Retrieved March 18, 2003 from
  55. U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Statistics, National Center for education statistics. (2007). Dropout Rates in the U.S.: 2005. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  56. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (1997). Characteristics and financial circumstances of AFDC Recipients FY 1996, aid to families with dependent children. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  57. van Door, J., Verhoef, P. C., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2007). The importance of non-linear relationships between attitude and behaviour in policy research. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wallman, K. (1993). Enhancing statistical literacy: enriching our society. Journal of American Statistical Association, 88, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wood, P. B., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2004). Attribution style and public policy attitudes toward gay rights. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wooley, M., & Propst, S. M. (2005). Public attitudes and perceptions about health-related research. The Journal of American Medical Association, 294(11), 1380–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lina Guzman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laura Lippman
    • 1
  • Kristin Anderson Moore
    • 1
  • William O’Hare
    • 2
  1. 1.Child TrendsWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Annie E. Casey FoundationBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations