Advertisement

Vocations and Learning

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 167–184 | Cite as

Making Space for Consuming Practices

  • Donna RooneyEmail author
  • Marie Manidis
  • Hermine Scheeres
Original Paper

Abstract

This empirically driven paper is about workplace learning with specific focus on the ‘work’ of consuming practices. By consuming we refer to the eating, and the drinking, and (at times) to the smoking that workers, in most organisations, do on a daily basis. Indeed, it is the quotidian nature of consuming, coupled with its absence from workplace learning research that make them noteworthy practices to explore. In using the term practice we draw on the recent tranche of practice based theorisations: notably Schatzki (1996, Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484, 2005, Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863-1873, 2006) and Gherardi (Human Relations, 54(1), 131-139, 2001, 2006, Learning Organization, 16(5), 352-359, 2009). The paper frames consuming practices as ‘dispersed’ (general) practices and, illustrated through empirical data from multiple projects, we progressively outline how these contribute to the learning of ‘integrative’ (specialized work) practices. Our overall aim is to (re)position consuming practices from prosaic, to having much relevance for research on workplace learning.

Keywords

Consuming Consuming practices Workplace learning Practice theory In-between 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The three research projects that this paper draws from each followed stringent University of Technology Sydney Research Committee protocols. Ethics clearances were secured and closely adhered to. This included gaining informed consent of the participants as well as their consent to have ‘their actual words’ included in research publications.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhabha, K. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billett, S. (2011). Workplace curriculum: Practice and propositions. In F. Dochy, M. Gijbels, & P. van den Bossche (Eds.), Theories of learning for the workplace: Building blocks for training and professional development programs (pp. 17–36). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brewis, J., & Grey, C. (2008). The regulation of smoking at work. Human Relations, 61(7), 965–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briner, R., & Sturdy, A. (2008). Introduction to food, work and organization. Human Relations, 61(7), 907–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, D., Rooney, D., & Solomon, N. (2009). Talking up learning at work: cautionary tales in co-opting learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(3), 323–334.Google Scholar
  7. Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within - Highlights: A report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Hamburg: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  8. du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (Eds.). (2000). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2004). Analysing casual conversation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenwick, T. & Field, J. (2014). Introduction of the visible and invisible in work and learning, Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 26, no. 6/7.Google Scholar
  13. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: tracing the socio-material. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Flores-Pereira, M., Davel, E., & Cavedon, N. (2008). Drinking beer and understanding organizational culture embodiment. Human Relations, 61(7), 1007–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flowers, R., & Swan, E. (2012). Pedagogies of doing good: problematisations, authorities, technologies and teleologies in food activism. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52(3), 532–572.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gherardi, S. (2001). From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations, 54(1), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Gherardi, S. (2009). Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: an introduction. Learning Organization, 16(5), 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hager, P. (2008). Learning and metaphors. Medical Teacher, no., 30, 679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hager, P., & Hodkinson, P. (2011). Becoming as an appropriate metaphor for understanding professional learning. In L. Scanion (Ed.), Becoming’ a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning (pp. 33–56). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harbers, H., Mol, A. P. J., & Stollmeyer, A. (2002). Arguments for an ethnography of daily care. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5/6), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heaton, J. (2008). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The handbook of social research methods (pp. 506–19). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopwood, N. (2014). Four essential dimensions of workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(6/7), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Keynes, J. M., & Moggridge, D. E. (1979). The general theory and after: A supplement. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
  27. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, Eng; Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Manidis, M., & Scheeres, H. (2012). Towards understanding workplace learning through theorising practice: at work in hospital emergency departments. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: practice-theoryperspectives on professional learning (pp. 103–118). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Morris, D. (2005). It’s a sprawl world after all: The human cost of unplanned growth - and visions of a better future. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers,Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of the community (3rd ed.). New York: Marlowe & Company.Google Scholar
  31. Parker, M. (2008). Eating with the Mafia: belonging and violence. Human Relations, 61(7), 989–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pina e Cunha, M., Cabral-Cardoso, C., & Clegg, S. (2008). Manna from heaven: the exuberance of food as a topic for research in management and organization. Human Relations, 61(7), 935–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Price, O., Johnsson, M., Scheeres, H., Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (2012). Learning organizational practices that persist perpetuate and change: A Schatzkian view. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: practice-theoryperspectives on professional learning (pp. 233–248). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Rooney, D., & Solomon, N. (2006). Consuming metaphors: stimulating questions for everyday learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 38(1), 64–73.Google Scholar
  35. Rooney, D., Willey, K., Gardner, A., Boud, D., Reich, A., & Fitzgerald, T. (2015). Engineers’ professional learning:Through the lens of practice. In B. Williams, J. Figueiredo & J. Trevelyan (Eds.), Engineering practice in a global context: understanding the technical and the social (pp. 265–283). Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations’. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one’. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shove, E., Trentmann, F., & Wilk, R. (2009). Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  42. Solomon, N., Boud, D., & Rooney, D. (2006). The in-between: exposing everyday learning at work. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  43. Soja, E. (2001). Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in social critical theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Sturdy, A., Schwarz, M., & Spicer, A. (2008). Guess who’s coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy. Human Relations, 59(7), 929–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Warner, A., Callaghan, E., & de Vreede, C. (2013). Promoting sustainable food and food citizenship through an adult education leisure experience. Leisure/Loisir, 37(4), 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations