Making Space for Consuming Practices
This empirically driven paper is about workplace learning with specific focus on the ‘work’ of consuming practices. By consuming we refer to the eating, and the drinking, and (at times) to the smoking that workers, in most organisations, do on a daily basis. Indeed, it is the quotidian nature of consuming, coupled with its absence from workplace learning research that make them noteworthy practices to explore. In using the term practice we draw on the recent tranche of practice based theorisations: notably Schatzki (1996, Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484, 2005, Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863-1873, 2006) and Gherardi (Human Relations, 54(1), 131-139, 2001, 2006, Learning Organization, 16(5), 352-359, 2009). The paper frames consuming practices as ‘dispersed’ (general) practices and, illustrated through empirical data from multiple projects, we progressively outline how these contribute to the learning of ‘integrative’ (specialized work) practices. Our overall aim is to (re)position consuming practices from prosaic, to having much relevance for research on workplace learning.
KeywordsConsuming Consuming practices Workplace learning Practice theory In-between
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The three research projects that this paper draws from each followed stringent University of Technology Sydney Research Committee protocols. Ethics clearances were secured and closely adhered to. This included gaining informed consent of the participants as well as their consent to have ‘their actual words’ included in research publications.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bhabha, K. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Billett, S. (2011). Workplace curriculum: Practice and propositions. In F. Dochy, M. Gijbels, & P. van den Bossche (Eds.), Theories of learning for the workplace: Building blocks for training and professional development programs (pp. 17–36). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boud, D., Rooney, D., & Solomon, N. (2009). Talking up learning at work: cautionary tales in co-opting learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(3), 323–334.Google Scholar
- Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within - Highlights: A report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Hamburg: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (Eds.). (2000). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2004). Analysing casual conversation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Fenwick, T. & Field, J. (2014). Introduction of the visible and invisible in work and learning, Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 26, no. 6/7.Google Scholar
- Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: tracing the socio-material. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Flowers, R., & Swan, E. (2012). Pedagogies of doing good: problematisations, authorities, technologies and teleologies in food activism. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52(3), 532–572.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Keynes, J. M., & Moggridge, D. E. (1979). The general theory and after: A supplement. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, Eng; Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Manidis, M., & Scheeres, H. (2012). Towards understanding workplace learning through theorising practice: at work in hospital emergency departments. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: practice-theoryperspectives on professional learning (pp. 103–118). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Morris, D. (2005). It’s a sprawl world after all: The human cost of unplanned growth - and visions of a better future. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers,Limited.Google Scholar
- Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of the community (3rd ed.). New York: Marlowe & Company.Google Scholar
- Price, O., Johnsson, M., Scheeres, H., Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (2012). Learning organizational practices that persist perpetuate and change: A Schatzkian view. In P. Hager, A. Lee & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: practice-theoryperspectives on professional learning (pp. 233–248). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Rooney, D., & Solomon, N. (2006). Consuming metaphors: stimulating questions for everyday learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 38(1), 64–73.Google Scholar
- Rooney, D., Willey, K., Gardner, A., Boud, D., Reich, A., & Fitzgerald, T. (2015). Engineers’ professional learning:Through the lens of practice. In B. Williams, J. Figueiredo & J. Trevelyan (Eds.), Engineering practice in a global context: understanding the technical and the social (pp. 265–283). Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Shove, E., Trentmann, F., & Wilk, R. (2009). Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
- Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
- Solomon, N., Boud, D., & Rooney, D. (2006). The in-between: exposing everyday learning at work. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
- Soja, E. (2001). Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in social critical theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar