Vocations and Learning

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 159–183 | Cite as

Explicating Individual Training Decisions

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In this paper, we explicate individual training decisions. For this purpose, we propose a framework based on instrumentality theory, a psychological theory of motivation that has frequently been applied to individual occupational behavior. To test this framework, we employ novel German individual data and estimate the effect of subjective expected utility (SEU) from continuing vocational training (CVT), the effect of restricting factors, and the effect of personal characteristics on the willingness to pay for CVT. Our results imply that SEU is generally the main driver of training decisions. In contrast, financial restrictions are most decisive for persons who are more likely to participate in training (i.e., training tendency). Time restraints also help explain why some individuals are entirely unwilling to participate. Moreover, regional infrastructure is a crucial training determinant. We also find that age and vocational qualifications do not directly affect training decisions. However, persons in specific occupational settings (e.g., low occupational status, overly challenging workplace situations) do exhibit a lower training tendency. Additionally, the training behavior of these persons appears to be more rigid, making them less likely to react to changes in their cognitive attitudes to training.

Keywords

Instrumentality theory Continuing vocational training Expected utility Individual participation Educational choice Training decision 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Backes-Gellner, U., Mure, J., & Tuor, S. (2007). The Puzzle of Non-Participation in Continuing Training – An empirical Study of Chronic vs. Temporary Non-Participation. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung, 40(2–3), 295–311.Google Scholar
  3. Behringer, F., & Descamps, R. (2009). Determinants of employer-provided training: A comparative analysis of Germany and France. In F. Behringer, B. Käpplinger, & G. Pätzold (Eds.), Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik. Beiheft 22 (pp. 94–123). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, J.-L., & D’Ascoli, Y. (2012). Motivations to Become Vocational Education and Training Educators: A Person-Oriented Approach. Vocations and Learning, 5(3), 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blundell, R., Dearden, L., Meghir, C., & Sianesi, B. (1999). Human Capital Investment: The Returns from Education and Training to the Individual, the Firm and the Economy. Fiscal Studies, 20(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brant, R. (1990). Assessing Proportionality in the Proportional Odds Model for Ordinal Logistic Regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Descy, P., & Tessaring, M. (2005). The value of learning: evaluation and impact of education and training. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar
  9. Eerde, W. V., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom’s Expectancy Models and Work-Related Criteria: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The MODE Model as an Integrative Framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23(1), 75–109.Google Scholar
  11. Fourage, D., Schils, T., & de Grip, A. (2013). Why Do Low-Educated Workers Invest Less in Further Training? Applied Economics, 45(18), 2587–2601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabay-Egozi, L., Shavit, Y., & Yaish, M. (2010). Curricular Choice: A Test of a Rational Choice Model of Education. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galbraith, J., & Cummings, L. (1967). An Empirical Investigation of the Motivational Determinants of Task Performance: Interactive Effects between Instrumentality-Valence and Motivation-Ability. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gegenfurtner, A. (2013). Dimensions of Motivation to Transfer: A Longitudinal Analysis of Their Influence on Retention, Transfer, and Attitude Change. Vocations and Learning, 6(2), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgopoulos, B., Mahoney, G., & Jones, N. (1957). A Path-Goal Approach to Productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41(6), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould, W., & Wolfe, R. (1998). An approximate likelihood-ratio test for ordinal response models. Stata Technical Bulletin, 42(March 1998), 24–27.Google Scholar
  17. Gritz, R. (1993). The impact of training on the frequency and duration of employment. Journal of Econometrics, 57(1), 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, J. (2006). Positive Externalities and Government Involvement in Education. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(2), 165–175.Google Scholar
  19. Jodlbauer, S., Selenko, E., Batinic, B., & Stiglbauer, B. (2011). The relationship between job dissatisfaction and training transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kinicki, A. (1989). Predicting Occupational Choices after Involuntary Job Loss. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35(2), 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kyndt, E., Govaerts, N., Dochy, F., & Baert, H. (2011). The Learning Intention of Low-Qualified Employees: A Key for Participation in Lifelong Learning and Continuous Training. Vocations and Learning, 4(3), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawler, E., & Suttle, J. (1973). Expectancy Theory and Job Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 482–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leuven, E. (2005). The Economics of Private Sector Training: A Survey of the Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(1), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loewenstein, M., & Spletzer, J. (1999). General and Specific Training: Evidence and Implications. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(4), 710–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch, L. (1991). The Role of Off-the-Job vs. On-the-Job Training for the Mobility of Women Workers. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 151–156.Google Scholar
  26. Miner, J. (2003). The Rated Importance, Scientific Validity, and Practical Usefulness of Organizational Behavior Theories: A Quantitative Review. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3), 250–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell, T. (1974). Expectancy Models of Job Satisfaction, Occupational Preference and Effort: A Theoretical, Methodological, and Empirical Appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 1053–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell, T., & Albright, D. (1972). Expectancy Theory Predictions of the Satisfaction, Effort, Performance and Retention of Naval Aviation Officers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (2011). Education at a Glance 2011 – OECD Indicators. Paris: OECDGoogle Scholar
  30. Offerhaus, J. (2013). The type to train? Impacts of personality characteristics on further training participation. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, (531–2013).Google Scholar
  31. Osborn, D. (1990). A Reexamination of the Organizational Choice Process. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rheinberg, F. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and flow. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 323–348). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, H. (1959). Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283.Google Scholar
  34. Stanovich, K., & West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. United Nations (2001). World Population Ageing: 1950–2050. New York: United Nations PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  36. Vroom, V. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Vroom, V. (2005). On the origins of expectancy theory. In K. Smith & M. Hitt (Eds.), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development (pp. 239–258). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wahba, M., & House, R. (1974). Expectancy Theory in Work and Motivation: Some Logical and Methodological Issues. Human Relations, 27(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walter, M., & Müller, N. (2013). Determinants of Individual Continuing Training 2010 (BIBB-DICT-Survey 2010). suf_1.0. Bonn: Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training. doi:  10.7803/611.10.1.1.10
  40. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered Logit/ Partial Proportial Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables. The Stata Journal, 61(1), 58–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Area Vocational Education and Training ResearchUniversity Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Federal Institute for Vocational Education and TrainingBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations