Vocations and Learning

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 345–364 | Cite as

Aesthetic Bildung in Vocational Education: The Biographical Case of Bookbinding Master Wolfgang B. and His Apprenticeship

  • Ruhi Tyson
Original Paper


In the present article I will be discussing the importance attributed to aesthetic experiences in the vocational education of bookbinding master Wolfgang B. using the philosophy of Friedrich Schiller both to understand what constitutes these processes and to examine Schiller’s thoughts in the light of his recollections. By doing this I hope to elaborate on a potential, and often overlooked, Bildung-related possibility or affordance at least in craft vocational education and training (VET) as well as to articulate a pattern that can be generalized from into other VET contexts.

This leads to a richer understanding of the potentials inherent in teaching skills or capabilities and the pedagogy needed to elicit these as opposed to the belief that teaching technique is a straightforward and unambiguous issue of manual practice. These are in the realm of aesthetic and ethical learning potentials (given that such learning is never automatic) as well as in the connections that one might establish to various fields of scientific and cultural knowledge. Through all of this there emerges a partial description of a vocational Bildung tradition that has its roots in the teaching of crafts.


Apprenticeship Bildung Schiller Aesthetic education Bookbinding 


  1. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education. Purposes, traditions and prospects. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brater, M., & Wagner, J. (2011). Künstlerische Aufgabenstellungen in der Erwachsenenbildung. München: Rainer Hampp.Google Scholar
  3. Brater, M., et al. (1985). Fachübergreifende qualifizierung durch künstlerische Übungen. München: Rainer Hampp.Google Scholar
  4. Brater, M., et al. (1986). Brücke zwischen Schule und Beruf. Der Förderlehrgang Voith. München: Rainer Hampp.Google Scholar
  5. Brater, M., et al. (1987). Fachausbildung + Künstlerische Übungen. Ein Weg zur Förderung beruflicher Handlungsfähigkeit. München: Rainer Hampp.Google Scholar
  6. Brater, M., et al. (2011). Kunst als Handeln – handeln als Kunst. Was die Arbeitswelt und Berufsbildung von Künstlern lernen können. München: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  7. Corsten, M., & Lempert, W. (1997). Beruf und Moral. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, M. (2009). The case for working with your hands. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1966) [1902]. The child and the curriculum. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (2005) [1934]. Art as experience. New York: Perigree.Google Scholar
  11. Dietrich, C., et al. (2013). Einführung in die ästetische Bildung. Weinheim: Belz Juventa.Google Scholar
  12. Dormer, P. (1994). The art of the maker. Skill and its meaning in art, craft and design. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  13. Dormer, P. (Ed.). (2010). The culture of craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground. Practical judgment and the lure of technique. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elbaz-Luwisch, F. (2014). Auto/biography & pedagogy. Memory & presence in teaching. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Frayling, C. (2011). On craftsmanship. London: Oberon Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gessler, L. (1988). Bildungserfolg im Spiegel von Bildungsbiographien. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Gonon, P. (2002). Georg Kerschensteiner: Begriff der Arbeitsschule. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Hohr, H. (2002a). Does beauty matter in education? Friedrich Schiller’s neo-humanistic approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hohr, H. (2002b). Illusion—how Friedrich Schiller can cast light on Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(3), 487–501.Google Scholar
  21. Josselson, R. (2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keim, W. (1985). Praktisch-berufliches lernen als teil der allgemeinbildung—eine historisch-systematische studie. In F. Edding (Ed.), Praktisches Lernen in der Hibernia-Pädagogik. Klett-Cotta: Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  23. Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. (Eds.). (2007). Enabling praxis: challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Lange, U., et al. (2001). Studienbuch Theorien der beruflichen Bildung. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  25. Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Obermann, A. (2013). Im Beruf Leben finden. Allgemeine Bildung in der Berufsbildung—didaktische Leitlinien für einen intergrativen Bildungsbegriff im Berufsschulunterricht. Göttingen: V & R Unipress.Google Scholar
  27. Rist, G., & Schneider, P. (1979). Integrating vocational and general education: a Rudolf Steiner school. Hamburg: Unesco institute for education.Google Scholar
  28. Rittelmeyer, C. (2005). Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen. Eine einführung in Friedrich Schillers pädagogische Anthropologie. München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  29. Rittelmeyer, C. (2012a). Bildung, ein pädagogischer Grundbegriff. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  30. Rittelmeyer, C. (2012b). Warum und wozu ästhetische Bildung? Oberhausen: Athena.Google Scholar
  31. Schiller, F. (2010). Über die ästethische Erziehung des Menschen. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  32. Schmalenbach, B. (2007). Eine heilpädagogische Psychologie der Hand. Luzern: Edition SZH/CSPS.Google Scholar
  33. Schmalenbach, B. (2011). Kunst in der Ausbildung sozialer Berufe. München: Kopaed.Google Scholar
  34. Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Smeyers, P., & Verhesschen, P. (2001). Narrative analysis as philosophical research: bridging the gap between the empirical and the conceptual. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, G. (2010). Doing case study: abduction not induction, phronesis not theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(7), 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vinterbo-Hohr, A., & Hohr, H. (2006). The neo-humanistic concept of bildung going astray: comments to Friedrich Schillers thoughts on education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(2), 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Volanen, M. V. (2012). Theoria, praxis, poiesis. Dissertation: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  39. West, L. (2001). Doctors on the edge. General practitioners, health and learning in the inner-city. London: Free association books.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, F. R. (1998). The Hand: how its use shapes the brain, language and human culture. New York: Pantheon books.Google Scholar
  41. Winch, C. (2012). Dimensions of expertise: a conceptual exploration of vocational knowledge. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations