Advertisement

Vocations and Learning

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 241–261 | Cite as

Vocational Students Experiences with Assessment in Workplace Learning

  • Ann Karin Sandal
  • Kari Smith
  • Ragne Wangensteen
Original Paper

Abstract

Vocational education, as part of the Norwegian upper secondary education, includes both school-based learning and workplace learning. While school-based learning is characterized by formal structures and guided by aims in the curricula, workplace learning is often informal, incidental and directed by the daily work-tasks. Assessment in workplace learning is mainly formative and different stakeholders are involved in the assessment; namely students, teachers and workplace instructors. However, the guidelines for assessment are vague and call for a close cooperation between the stakeholders. This is demanding and has resulted in a variety of assessment practices. The study presented in this article is a qualitative study of students’ experiences with assessment in workplace learning periods in their first year in vocational education. The aim of the study is to give voice to students` experiences with assessment and illuminate how assessment supports their learning processes. Data was collected through focus group interviews with two groups of students in the Programme for Health and Social Care. The main findings indicate different assessment cultures in school and workplaces. This is expressed through the students’ perceptions of assessment, assessment criteria, tools for assessment and vocational knowledge. It is recommended that an open dialogue about the discontinuity in assessment between schools and workplaces is one of several measures necessary to bridge the gap between the stakeholders.

Keywords

Assessment Vocational education Workplace learning 

References

  1. Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bäckman, O., Jakobsen, V., Lorentzen, T., Österbacka, E., Dahl, E. (2011) Dropping out in Scandinavia. Social Exclusion and Labour Market Attachment among Upper Secondary school Dropouts in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Working Report 2011:8. Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm & Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self–efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Belize, J., & Öberg, G. (2012). Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research, 2(4), 459–472.Google Scholar
  5. Billett, S. (2002). Critiquing workplace learning discourses: participation and continuity at work. Studies in the Education of Adult, 34(1), 56–67.Google Scholar
  6. Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices. Conceptualizing workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Phi Delta Kappa.Google Scholar
  8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boekaerts, M. (2006). Self-regulation and effort investment. In K. A. Renninger & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Child psychology in practice (6th edition), Vol. 4, pp. 345–377). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 5(5), 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boud, D., & Molloy, M. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. Understanding it and doing it well. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Broadfoot, P. M., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Gipps, C. V., Harlen, W., James, M., et al. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Collin, K. (2004). The role of experience in work and learning among design engineers. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches. Calefornia: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Directorate for Education and Training (2012) Utdanningsspeilet. Oslo.Google Scholar
  18. Directorate for Education and Training (2011) Prosjekt til fordypning. En veileder for dere som skal legge forholdene til rette for elevene i PTF. Oslo.Google Scholar
  19. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Students perceptions of classroom feedback (p. 20(2)). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice.Google Scholar
  21. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kvale, S. (2004). Praktikkens evalueringsformer [Forms of assessment in practice. In Danish]. Undervisningsminesteriets tidsskrift Uddannelse (10) Forskning og erhvervsuddannelse. http://udd.uvm.dk/200410/udd200410-06.htm?menuid=4515 (retrieved 2009-10-02).
  24. Kvale, S. (2007): Vurdering i skole—vurdering i bedrift. Paper presentation Landskonferansen 2007: Vurdering for/av læring, Oslo.Google Scholar
  25. Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2009) Interview. Introduktion til et håndværk. 2. udgave. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  26. Lamb, S., Markussen, E., Teese, R., Sandberg, N., & Polesel, J. (Eds.). (2010). School dropout and completion: international comparative studies in theory and policy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (2005) Situeret læring og andre tekster. 3. oplag. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.Google Scholar
  28. Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus Group Methodology. Principles and Practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Lindberg, Viveca (2003) Learning Practices in Vocational Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 47 (2).Google Scholar
  30. Markussen, E. (Ed.). (2009). Videregående opplæring for (nesten) alle. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk.Google Scholar
  31. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (1999). Envisioning new organisations for learning. In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding learning at work (pp. 199–216). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. McLafferty, I. (2004) Focus group interview as a data collecting strategy. Methodological Issues in Nursing research.Google Scholar
  33. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Knowledge (2006a) White paper no. 16 (2006–2007) og ingen stod igjen. Oslo.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Knowledge (2006b) The National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training. Oslo.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Knowledge (2007) White Paper no. 31 (2007–2008) Kvalitet i skolen. Oslo.Google Scholar
  37. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousands Oakes: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2007) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. Google Scholar
  39. Nielsen, K., & Kvale, S. (Eds.). (2003). Praktikkens læringslandskab. At lære gennem arbejde. København: Akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
  40. Nyen, T., & Tønder, A. H. (2012). Fleksibilitet eller faglighet? En studie av innføringen av faget prosjekt til fordypning i Kunnskapsløftet (p. 47). Oslo: Fafo-rapport.Google Scholar
  41. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001) Transition from initial education to working life. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  42. Pachler, N.; Daly, C.; Mor, Y. & Mellar, H. (2009) Formative e-assessment: practitioner cases. Computers & Education. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00592754/. Accessed 29 April 2013.
  43. Parker, A., & Tritter, J. (2006). Focus goup methodand methodology: current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousands Oakes: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 655–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richards, L. (2005). Handling Qualitative Data. A pratical guide. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: the role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Schaap, H., Baartman, L., & Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: a review. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schön, D. A. (2000). Udvikling af ekspertise gennem refleksion–i–handling. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Tekster om læring. Fredriksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  53. Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  54. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sluijsmans, D., Straetmans, G., & Merriënboer, J. (2008). Integrating authentic assessment with competence‐based learning in vocational education: the protocol portfolio scoring. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, K. (2009). Vurdering i et dialogperspektiv. In J. Frost (Ed.), Evaluering i et dialogperspektiv. Cappelen Forlag: Oslo.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, K., & Tilema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(6).Google Scholar
  59. Tanggaard, L. (2004). Evaluering som regulering af læring [Assessment as regulation of learning. In Danish]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 6(4), 57–75.Google Scholar
  60. Tanggaard, L. (2007). Learning at trade vocational school and learning at work: boundary crossing in apprentices’ everyday life. Journal of Education at Work, 20(5), 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tillema, H., et al. (2000). Competencies as building blocks for integrating assessment with instruction in vocational education: a case from The Netherlands. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3).Google Scholar
  62. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education, 14(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vaage, S. (2001). Perspektivtaking, rekonstruksjon av erfaring og kreative læreprosessar: George Herbert Mead og John Dewey om læring. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), Dialog, samspel og læring. Oslo: Abstract Forlag.Google Scholar
  64. Virtanen, A., Tynjajälä, P., & Collin, K. (2009). Characteristics of workplace learning among finnish vocational students. Vocations and Learning, 2(3), 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. von Wrigth, M. (2006). The punctual fallacy of participation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(2).Google Scholar
  66. von Wrigth, M. (2000). Vad eller vem? En pedagogisk rekonstruktion av G. H (Meads teori om männiksors intersubjektivitet). Gothenburg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  67. Wenger (2006) Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press. 14th printing.Google Scholar
  68. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Karin Sandal
    • 1
  • Kari Smith
    • 2
  • Ragne Wangensteen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Teacher Education and SportsSogn and Fjordane University CollegeSogndalNorway
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations