Vocations and Learning

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 281–295 | Cite as

Caring and Daring Discourses at Work: Doing Gender Through Occupational Choices in Elderly Care and Police Work

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper aims to problematise how gender is being done—1. through occupational choices in two occupations that are traditionally gender divided, elderly care and police work, and 2. through the division of work assignments in police work. Interviews with care workers and police officers are analysed using a “doing gender” perspective, a post-structural notion of subjectivity inspired by Michel Foucault and positioning theory. We argue that a caring discourse operates in elderly care workers’ and police officers’ statements concerning occupational choices, while a daring discourse operates in statements concerning occupational choices within police work. Through these discourses, gender is being done in different ways; caring dispositions are constructed as totally female within the context of elderly care but as more gender-neutral in police work. At the same time, a macho or daring attitude is constructed as a male attribute in police work. Such constructions may have social consequences in terms of dividing work tasks for police, where male officers work in more prestigious and “dangerous” areas, while female officers are left with less prestigious, more caring-associated working areas.

Keywords

Doing gender Foucault Elderly care work Police work Occupational choice 

References

  1. Åberg, B. (2001). Samarbete på könsblandade arbetsplatser – En könsteoretisk analys av arbetsdelning mellan kvinnor och män i två yrken: akutsjuksköterskor och ordningspoliser. [Doktorsavhandling] Örebro universitet.Google Scholar
  2. Billett, S., Newton, J., & Ockerby, C. H. (2010). Socio-personal premises for selecting and securing an occupation as vocation. Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1), 47–62.Google Scholar
  3. Bimrose, J. (2001). Girls and women: challenges for careers guidance practice. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 29(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: continuity and change in young people’s dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cedermark Hedberg, G. (1985). Kvinnor och män i polisutbildningen. Polissystemets reaktioner på en ökad andel kvinnor i polisyrket. [Doktorsavhandling] Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W. (2008). Maskuliniteter. Göteborg: Bokförlaget Daidalos AB.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlgren, J. (2007). Kvinnor i polistjänst. Föreningen kamraterna, svenska polisförbundet och kvinnors inträde i polisyrket 1957–1971 [Doktorsavhandling] Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Guzman, M. C., & Frank, J. (2003). Policewomen and their problems: the Philippine context. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27(3), 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch, F. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21, 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fejes, A., & Dahlstedt, M. (2013). The confessing society: Foucault, confession and practices of lifelong learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fejes, A., & Nicoll, K. (Eds.). (2008). Foucault and lifelong learning: Governing the subject. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fejes, A., & Nicoll, K. (2010). A vocational calling: exploring a caring technology in elderly care. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(3), 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Jutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1998). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality: 1. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frewin, K., & Tuffin, K. (1998). Police status, conformity and internal pressure: a discursive analysis of police culture. Discourse Society, 9(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia, V. (2005). Constructing the ‘other’ within police culture: an analysis of a deviant unit within the police organization. Police Practice and Research, 6(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organisational cultures. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Gottfredson, L. S., & Lapan, R. T. (1997). Assessing gender-based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5(4), 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haake, U. (2009). Doing leadership in higher education: the gendering process of leader identity development. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(4), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haake, U. (2011). Att göra kön i ledarskap. En studie av ledarskap i vardag och kris inom Polisen. Umeå universitet: Pedagogiska institutionen, rapport nr. 87.Google Scholar
  25. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Hodkinson, P., & Sparkes, A. W. (1997). Careership: a sociological theory of career decision making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, L. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227–263). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  28. Jeanes, E. L. (2007). The doing and undoing of gender: the importance of being a credible victim. Gender, Work and Organization, 14(6), 552–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelan, E. (2010). Gender logic and (un)doing gender at work. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(2), 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, P. Y., & Collinson, D. L. (1999). Gender and sexuality in organisations. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 285–310). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Mavin, S., & Grandy, G. (2012). Doing gender well and differently in management. Gender in Mangement: An International Journal, 27(4), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morash, M., & Haarr, R. N. (2012). Doing, redoing, and undoing gender: variation in gender identities of women working as police officers. Feminist Criminology, 7(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Myers, K., Forest, K., & Miller, S. (2004). Officer Friendly and the tough cop: gays and lesbians navigate homophobia and policing. Journal of Homosexuality, 47(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nightingale, F. (1969). Notes on nursing: What it is, and what it is not. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  36. Patterson, N., Mavin, S., & Turner, J. (2012). Unsettling the gender binary: experiences of gender in entrepreneurial leadership and implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 687–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rabe-Hemp, C. (2009). POLICEwomen or policeWOMEN?: doing gender and police work. Feminist Criminology, 4, 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shields, S. A., & Dicicco, E. C. (2011). The social psychology of sex and gender: from gender differences to doing gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simpson, R. (2005). Men in non-traditional occupations: career entry, career orientation and experience of role strain. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(4), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skeggs, B. (1997). The formation of class and gender. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Somerville, M. (2003). Who learns?: Enriching learning cultures in aged care workplaces. Paper presented at the 11th Annual International conference on Post-compulsory Education and Training: Enriching learning cultures, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
  42. Stewart, B. (2008) Pathways into policing: a gendered experience? In The Proceedings of The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) Annual Conference, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  43. Vaughn, S., Shay Schumm, J., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Waerness, K. (1996). The rationality of caring. In S. Gordon, P. Benner, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Caregiving: Readings in knowledge, practice, ethics and politics (pp. 231–255). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  45. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society, 23(1), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Westin, C., & Nilsson, A. (2009). Attityd- och bemötandeproblem inom polisen. Stockholm: Rapport till Rikspolisstyrelsen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Umeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations