Vocations and Learning

, 2:217 | Cite as

Re-making Jobs: Enacting and Learning Work Practices

  • Oriana Milani PriceEmail author
  • Hermine Scheeres
  • David Boud
Original Paper


This paper takes up understandings of organisations where practices constitute and frame past and present work, as well as future work practice possibilities. Within this view, work practices, and thus organisations, are both perpetuated and varied through employees’ enactments of work. Using a practice lens, we are particularly interested in the ways workers simultaneously maintain and alter practices in their workplace—we characterise this as re-making one’s job. This perspective challenges ways in which managers often depict jobs and everyday work—as rational, linear and easily describable. We suggest that workers at various levels of responsibility contribute more to the formation of organisational practices than is often assumed. The processes of re-making jobs and remaking organisational practices create tensions that we posit as sites for learning. This paper addresses these issues through a focus on work practices in two Australian organisations that have been undergoing significant cultural change.


Organisational practice Learning Jobs Work practices 


  1. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2006). ‘What counts as practice in doctoral education. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), 7th Quality in Postgraduate Research Conferences: Knowledge creation in testing times (pp. 1–10). Adelaide: Quality in Postgraduate Research.Google Scholar
  2. Chappell, C., Scheeres, H., Boud, D., & Rooney, D. (2009). Working out work: integrated development practices in organizations. In J. Field, J. Gallacher & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching transitions in lifelong learning (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Contu, A., & Willmott (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, S. D. N., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dragonetti, N. C., Antonacopoulou, E. P., Broekhuizen, M. C. S. & Patnaik, S. (2005). Organisational learning: A review, a critique and a way forward. Proceedings of the First Organization Studies Summer Workshop: ‘Theorizing Process in Organizational Research’, Santorini, Greece: 12–13 June 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature, trans. Hella Beister and William Rehg. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, R. (2002). Leading change in local government: the tension between evolutionary and frame-breaking reform in NSW. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kemmis, S. (2005). Knowing practice: searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13(3), 391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kemmis, S. (2007). Critical theory and participatory action research. In P. Reasons & E. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative enquiry and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  13. Price, O., Rooney, D., Scheeres, H. and Boud, D. (2007). That’s (not) my job: inventing and developing work practices in an adult education organization. In Researching adult learning: Communities and partnerships in the local and global context. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of SCUTREA, Belfast: School of Education, Queen’s University, 388–395Google Scholar
  14. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: the sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (eds). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Traynor, G. (2004). Funding and certainty in community based organizations. Proceedings of the American Association of Adult and Continuing Education Conference, Louisville, Kentucky. November 3–6, 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oriana Milani Price
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hermine Scheeres
    • 1
  • David Boud
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversity of TechnologyBroadwayNSW Australia

Personalised recommendations