Initial Vocational Training from a Company Perspective: a Comparison of British and German In-House Training Cultures

Original Paper

Abstract

Vocational training and skills are playing an increasingly important role in the developed economies. However, both the vocational education structure and the underlying philosophy and culture of education and training vary from country to country. What is clear, though, is that employers play a crucial role in all cases; this paper explores the reasons why companies in different countries are willing to invest in initial vocational education and how they do so. The paper will focus on Great Britain and Germany as examples of a market-led model and a state-directed model, respectively. Interviews with employers in both countries show that, in Britain, initial vocational education is strongly task-related in most cases or else is seen as the employee’s private, individual concern. In Germany, by contrast, a much broader range of initial vocational education is available and is viewed as an integral part of company culture.

Keywords

Great Britain Germany In-house training Vocational education and training policy Skills acquisition 

References

  1. BIBB [Federal Institute for Vocational Training] (2002). Reasons for providing training companies. Bonn: BIBB.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, J. (1995). Outcomes, learning and the curriculum—implications for NVQs, GNVQs and other qualifications. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Canning, R., & Lang, I. (2004). Modern apprenticeships in Scotland. Journal of Education Policy, 19(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CEDEFOP (2007). Spotlight on VET. Germany: CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, L., et al. (1994). Die politische Ökonomie der Berufsbildung in Großbritannien und in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 40(3), 373–388.Google Scholar
  6. Cuddy, N., & Leney, T. (2005). Vocational education and training in the United Kingdom Short description. Cedefop-Panorama Series 111 Luxembourg. Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www2.trainingvillage.gr/etv/publication/download/panorama/5159_en.pdf.
  7. Deissinger, T. (1994). The evolution of the modern vocational training systems in England and Germany: a comparative view. Compare. A Journal of Comparative Education, 24(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deissinger, T. (1997). The German dual system—a model for Europe? Education and Training, 39(8), 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deissinger, T., & Hellwig, S. (2005). Apprenticeships in Germany: modernising the dual system. Education + Training, 47(4/5), 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finegold, D., & Soskice, D. (1988). The failure of training in Britain: analysis and prescription. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4(3), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, A. (1995). The role of the state and the social partners in VET systems. In L. Bash, & A. Green (Eds.), Youth, education and work [world yearbook of education 1995] (pp. 92–108). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  12. Greinert, W. D. (1988). Marktmodell–Schulmodell–Duales system: Grundtypen formalisierter Berufsbildung. Die berufsbildende Schule, 40(3), 145–156.Google Scholar
  13. Greinert, W. D. (2007). The German philosophy of vocational education. In L. Clarke, & C. Winch (Eds.), Vocational education: international approaches, developments and systems (pp. 49–61). London: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  14. Hippach-Schneider, U., Krause, M., & Woll, C. (2007). Vocational education and training in Germany: short description. Cedefop-Panorama Series 136 Luxembourg. Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www.trainingvillage.gr/etv/Upload/Information_resources/Bookshop/465/5173_en.pdf.
  15. Keep, E. (2005). Reflections on the curious absence of employers, labour market incentives and labour market regulation in English 14–19 policy: first signs of a change in direction? Journal of Education Policy, 20(5), 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koch, R., & Reuling, J. (1998). Institutional framework conditions and regulation of initial vocational training using Germany, France and Great Britain as examples. In Vocational education and training—the European research field [background report, vol. I] (pp. 1–32). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  17. Lam, A., & Marsden, D. (1994). Labour markets and skill utilization. In R. Layard, M. Ken, & G. Owen (Eds.), Britain’s training deficit—the centre for economic performance report (pp. 125–141). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
  18. Marsden, D., & Ryan, P. (1991). Initial training, labour market structure and public policy: intermediate skills in British and German industry. In R. Paul (Ed.), International comparisons of vocational education and training for intermediate skills (pp. 251–285). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Marsden, D., & Ryan, P. (1995). Work, labour markets and vocational preparation: Anglo-German comparisons of training in intermediate skills. In L. Bash, & A. Green (Eds.), Youth, education and work [world yearbook of education 1995] (pp. 67–79). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  20. Niemeyer, B. (2007). Between school and work—dilemmas in European comparative transition research. European Journal of Vocational Education, 41, 117–136.Google Scholar
  21. Nilson, A. (2007). Current national strategies in vocational education and training: convergence or divergence? European Journal of Vocational Education, 41, 150–162.Google Scholar
  22. OECD (2002). Investment in human capital through post-compulsory education and training: selected efficiency and equity aspects. [Economics department working paper no. 333]. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Page, R., & Hillage, J. (2006). Vocational education and training in the UK: strategies to overcome skill gaps in the workforce. [WZB discussion paper]. Berlin: WBZ.Google Scholar
  24. Pilz, M. (2002a). The contrast between modular and occupational approaches to modernising vocational training. CEDEFOP Vocational Training—European Journal, (25), 27–33.Google Scholar
  25. Pilz, M. (2002b). Modularisation in the Scottish education system: a view from the outside. Scottish Educational Review, 34(2), 163–174.Google Scholar
  26. Pilz, M. (2007). Two countries—one system of vocational education? A comparison of the apprenticeship reform in the commercial sector in Switzerland and Germany. Compare. A Journal of Comparative Education, 37(1), 69–68.Google Scholar
  27. Prais, S. J. (1995). Productivity, education and training: an international perspective [The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Occasional Papers XLVIII]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Raffe, D. (1994). The new flexibility in vocational education. In W. J. Nijhof, & J. N. Streumer (Eds.), Flexibility in vocational education and training (pp. 13–32). Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma.Google Scholar
  29. Raggatt, P. (1991). Quality assurance and NVQs. In P. Raggatt, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Change and intervention: vocational education and training (pp. 61–80). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  30. Rose, R., & Wignanek, G. (1990). Training without trainers?—How Germany avoids Britain’s supply-side bottleneck. London: Anglo-German Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Ryan, P. (2003). Evaluating vocationalism. European Journal of Education, 38(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sauter, E., & Schmidt, J. (2002). Training standards in Germany—the development of new vocational education and training (VET) standards [Federal Institute for Vocational Training]. Bonn: BIBB.Google Scholar
  33. Schuchart, C. (2007). Schulabschluss und Ausbildungsberuf: Zur Bedeutung der schulartbezogenen Bildungsbiografie. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10(3), 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shah, C., & Burke, G. (2005). Skill shortages: concepts, measurement and policy responses. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31(1), 44–71.Google Scholar
  35. Steedman, H. (1993). Do workforce skills matter? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(2), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steedman, H., Mason, G., & Wagner, K. (1991). Intermediate skills in the workplace: deployment, standards and supply in Britain, France and Germany. National Institute Economic Review, (136), 60–73.Google Scholar
  37. Scottish Qualifications Authority (2002). SVQs: a user’s guide. Glasgow: Scottish Qualifications Authority.Google Scholar
  38. Scottish Qualifications Authority (2006). SVQs: a guide for employers. Glasgow: Scottish Qualifications Authority.Google Scholar
  39. Scottish Qualifications Authority (2007). Annual statistical report 2006. Glasgow: Scottish Qualifications Authority.Google Scholar
  40. Unwin, L. (1996). Employer-led realities: apprenticeship past and present. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 48(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walden, G. (2007). Short-term and long-term benefits as determinants of the training behavior of companies. Journal for Labour market Research (ZFA/IAB), 40(2/3), 168–191.Google Scholar
  42. Winch, C., & Clarke, L. (2003). Front-loaded vocational education versus lifelong learning: a critique of current UK government policy. Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolf, A. (1998). Competence based assessment. Does it shift the demarcation lines. In W. J. Nijhof, & J. N. Streumer (Eds.),Key qualifications in work and education (pp. 207–220). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pädagogischen Hochschule FreiburgUniversity of EducationFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations