Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bortezomib maintenance therapy in transplant-ineligible myeloma patients who plateaued after bortezomib-based induction therapy: a multicenter phase II clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the era of novel therapeutic agents for multiple myeloma (MM), both the significance of achieving the plateau phase and the efficacy of subsequent maintenance therapy remain unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance therapy (biweekly for 1 year) in transplant-ineligible MM patients who plateaued after bortezomib-based induction therapy. Of 36 evaluable patients, the overall response rate during induction therapy was 61%, with a stringent complete response in 6%, a complete response in 6%, a very good partial response in 17%, and a partial response in 33%. Twenty patients achieved the plateau phase and subsequently received bortezomib maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival from the induction and maintenance therapies was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4–23.7 months) and 10.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7–10.7 months), respectively. During maintenance therapy, there were no cases with grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy, nor was there any improvement in the quality of the response. In conclusion, although maintenance therapy with biweekly bortezomib for up to 1 year was feasible, plateau-oriented bortezomib induction therapy followed by bortezomib maintenance therapy was not adequate in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1046–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexanian R, Haut A, Khan AU, Lane M, McKelvey EM, Migliore PJ, et al. Treatment for multiple myeloma. Combination chemotherapy with different melphalan dose regimens. JAMA. 1969;208(9):1680–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacLennan IC, Chapman C, Dunn J, Kelly K. Combined chemotherapy with ABCM versus melphalan for treatment of myelomatosis. The Medical Research Council Working Party for Leukaemia in Adults. Lancet. 1992;339(8787):200–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexanian R, Gehan E, Haut A, Saiki J, Weick J. Unmaintained remissions in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1978;51(6):1005–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergsagel DE, Bailey AJ, Langley GR, MacDonald RN, White DF, Miller AB, et al. The chemotherapy on plasma-cell myeloma and the incidence of acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(14):743–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuzick J, Erskine S, Edelman D, Galton DA. A comparison of the incidence of the myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia following melphalan and cyclophosphamide treatment for myelomatosis. A report to the Medical Research Council’s working party on leukaemia in adults. Br J Cancer. 1987;55(5):523–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritz E, Ludwig H. Interferon-alpha treatment in multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials among 3948 patients. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(11):1427–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Interferon as therapy for multiple myeloma: an individual patient data overview of 24 randomized trials and 4012 patients. Br J Haematol. 2001;113(4):1020–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wisløff F, Hjorth M, Kaasa S, Westin J. Effect of interferon on the health-related quality of life of multiple myeloma patients: results of a Nordic randomized trial comparing melphalan-prednisone to melphalan-prednisone + alpha-interferon. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Br J Haematol. 1996;94(2):324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(18):1860–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano J, Belch AR, Cavo M, et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):906–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Larocca A, Rossi D, Di Raimondo F, Magarotto V, et al. Bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone–thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib–thalidomide compared with bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and improved survival. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(7):634–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, Anderson KC, Dimopoulos M, Kyle R, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. 2011;117(18):4691–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Belch A, Shelley W, Bergsagel D, Wilson K, Klimo P, White D, et al. A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. Br J Cancer. 1988;57(1):94–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaar CG, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Te Marvelde C, le Cessie S, Breed WP, Fibbe WE, et al. Interferon-alpha as maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(4):634–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A’Hern RP. Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med. 2001;20(6):859–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48(3):452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, Kropff M, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hata H. JSH guideline for multiple myeloma. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2013;54(10):1850–5 (article in Japanese).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreau P, San Miguel J, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Zamagni E, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl 4):52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mateos MV, Bringhen S, Richardson PG, Lahuerta JJ, Larocca A, Oriol A, et al. Bortezomib cumulative dose, efficacy, and tolerability with three different bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone regimens in previously untreated myeloma patients ineligible for high-dose therapy. Haematologica. 2014;99(6):1114–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Larocca A, Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, Oliva S, Falcone AP, Caravita T, et al. A phase 2 study of three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib regimens in elderly frail patients with untreated multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2016;30(6):1320–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Niesvizky R, Flinn IW, Rifkin R, Gabrail N, Charu V, Clowney B, et al. Community-Based phase IIIB trial of three UPFRONT bortezomib-based myeloma regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(33):3921–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mateos MV, Richardson PG, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Anderson KC, Shi H, et al. Effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone in the phase III VISTA study. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(4):314–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf IG, van der Holt B, El Jarari L, Bertsch U, Salwender H, et al. Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(24):2946–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the patients who participated in this study and their families as well as all investigators, physicians, nurses, and clinical research coordinators who helped with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Isoda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

K. Kirito received an honorarium from Novartis Pharma K.K. T. Chou received an honorarium from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Celgene K.K., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and Novartis Pharma K.K. H. Murakami received an honorarium from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isoda, A., Murayama, K., Ito, S. et al. Bortezomib maintenance therapy in transplant-ineligible myeloma patients who plateaued after bortezomib-based induction therapy: a multicenter phase II clinical trial. Int J Hematol 108, 39–46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-018-2448-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-018-2448-9

Keywords

Navigation