International Journal of Hematology

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 518–523 | Cite as

Bortezomib and dexamethasone for Japanese patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a single center experience

  • Natsue Igarashi
  • Takaaki Chou
  • Takayuki Hirose
  • Yousuke Imai
  • Takuro Ishiguro
Original Article

Abstract

Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor, which has shown high antimyeloma activity. APEX trial, phase III randomized study for relapsed or refractory myeloma established efficacy and feasibility of bortezomib. In our study, we retrospectively investigated 60 Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) therapy in our institution. Overall response rate was 75%, including 7 cases (11.7%) of complete response and 13 cases (21.7%) of very good partial response. Stable disease and progressive disease were observed in 15 patients (25%). Major ≥grade 3 adverse events were hematological toxicities and grade 3 non-hematological toxicities included appetite loss, diarrhea and peripheral neuropathy. BD therapy was well tolerated, and produced significant response in relapsed or refractory MM patients. Recently, many worldwide trials including bortezomib or other new agents are ongoing to evaluate its efficacy not only as a therapy for relapsed or refractory disease but also as a frontline therapy. Further investigations are required to define how to use new antimyeloma agents for Japanese MM patients.

Keywords

Bortezomib Multiple myeloma Plateau phase Autologous stem cell transplantation High-dose chemotherapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Singhal S, Jagannath S, Irwin D, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2609–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Siegel D, Irwin D, Richardson PG. A phase 2 study of two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2004;127(2):165–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Irwin D, Stadtmauer EA, Facon T, Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) Investigators, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2487–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogawa Y, Tobinai K, Ogura M, Ando K, Tsuchiya T, Kobayashi Y, et al. Phase I and II pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(1):140–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroup Français du Myélome. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(2):91–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(19):1875–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bladé J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Björkstrand B, Gahrton G, et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol. 1998;102(5):1115–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Bladé J, Barlogie B, Anderson K, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20(9):1467–73.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jagannath S, Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Irwin D, Stadtmauer EA, et al. Bortezomib appears to overcome the poor prognosis conferred by chromosome 13 deletion in phase 2 and 3 trials. Leukemia. 2007;21(1):151–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster M, Irwin D, Stadtmauer E, Facon T, et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial. Blood. 2007;110(10):3557–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Argyriou AA, Iconomou G, Kalofonos HP. Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review of the literature. Blood. 2008;112(5):1593-9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palumbo A, Sezer O, Kyle R, Miguel JS, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma patients ineligible for standard high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2009;23(10):1716–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasegawa Y, Kawahara F, Nagai H, Hirose T, Imai Y, Ishiguro T, et al. Prophylaxis with acyclovir for herpes zoster infection during bortezomib–dexamethasone combination therapy. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2009;50(6):488–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chanan-Khan A, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Stadtmauer EA, Facon T, Harousseau JL, et al. Analysis of herpes zoster events among bortezomib-treated patients in the phase III APEX study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(29):4784–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tong Y, Qian J, Li Y, Meng H, Jin J. The high incidence of varicella herpes zoster with the use of bortezomib in 10 patients. Am J Hematol. 2007;82(5):403–4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kropff M, Bisping G, Schuck E, Liebisch P, Lang N, Hentrich M, et al. Bortezomib in combination with intermediate-dose dexamethasone and continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for relapsed multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2007;138(3):330–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mateos MV, Hernández JM, Hernández MT, Gutiérrez NC, Palomera L, Fuertes M, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter phase 1/2 study. Blood. 2006;108(7):2165–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barlogie B, Pineda-Roman M, van Rhee F, Haessler J, Anaissie E, Hollmig K, et al. Thalidomide arm of Total Therapy 2 improves complete remission duration and survival in myeloma patients with metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities. Blood. 2008;112(8):3115–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barlogie B, Anaissie E, Haessler J, van Rhee F, Pineda-Roman M, Hollmig K, et al. Complete remission sustained 3 years from treatment initiation is a powerful surrogate for extended survival in multiple myeloma. Cancer. 2008;113(2):355–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martínez-López J, Rosiñol L, Sureda A, de la Rubia J, et al. Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5775–82.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoering A, Crowley J, Shaughnessy JD Jr, Hollmig K, Alsayed Y, Szymonifka J, et al. Complete remission in multiple myeloma examined as time-dependent variable in terms of both onset and duration in Total Therapy protocols. Blood. 2009;114(7):1299–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JS, Kim K, Cheong JW, Min YH, Suh C, Kim H, Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party, et al. Complete remission status before autologous stem cell transplantation is an important prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing upfront single autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(4):463–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niesvizky R, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, Coleman M, Rosiñol L, Sonneveld P, et al. The relationship between quality of response and clinical benefit for patients treated on the bortezomib arm of the international, randomized, phase 3 APEX trial in relapsed multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2008;143(1):46–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paiva B, Vidriales MB, Cerveró J, Mateo G, Pérez JJ, Montalbán MA, GEM (Grupo Español de MM)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Groups, et al. Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2008;112(10):4017–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van de Velde HJ, Liu X, Chen G, Cakana A, Deraedt W, Bayssas M. Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2007;92(10):1399–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajkumar SV, Fonseca R, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Witzig TE, Lust JA, et al. Effect of complete response on outcome following autologous stem cell transplantation for myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;26(9):979–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pineda-Roman M, Bolejack V, Arzoumanian V, Anaissie E, van Rhee F, Zangari M, et al. Complete response in myeloma extends survival without, but not with history of prior monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering disease. Br J Haematol. 2007;136(3):393–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Durie BG, Russell DH, Salmon SE. Reappraisal of plateau phase in myeloma. Lancet. 1980;2(8185):65–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Corso A, Nozza A, Lazzarino M, Klersy C, Zappasodi P, Arcaini L, et al. Plateau phase in multiple myeloma: an end-point of conventional-dose chemotherapy. Haematologica. 1999;84(4):336–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hari P, Pasquini MC, Vesole DH. Cure of multiple myeloma—more hype, less reality. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;37(1):1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stewart AK, Richardson PG, San-Miguel JF. How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients. Blood. 2009;114(27):5436–43.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kumar SK, Mikhael JR, Buadi FK, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo stratification of myeloma and risk-adapted therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(12):1095–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet JG, et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(26):2495–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Hematology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natsue Igarashi
    • 1
  • Takaaki Chou
    • 1
  • Takayuki Hirose
    • 1
  • Yousuke Imai
    • 1
  • Takuro Ishiguro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineNiigata Cancer Center HospitalNiigata CityJapan

Personalised recommendations