Failure of copy Imatib (CIPLA, India) to maintain hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase
- 412 Downloads
- 16 Citations
Abstract
A 50-year-old woman presented with CML-CP and was initially treated with branded imatinib (Glivec®) 400 mg/day. She rapidly achieved a complete hematologic response (CHR), at which point she switched therapy to a copy version of imatinib (Imatib). She received 400 mg/day of Imatib for 3 months, during which time her platelet count decreased from 250 × 109 to 105 × 109/L and her hemoglobin count fell from 12.8 to 11 g/dL. The patient’s total leukocyte count rose rapidly from 4 × 109 to 70 × 109/L, and the CHR was lost. At this point, therapy was switched back to Glivec at 400 mg/day, and the CHR was rapidly regained. Furthermore, the patient achieved a major cytogenetic response by 6 months after reintroduction of Glivec. This case report suggests a difference in clinical efficacy between the authorized form of imatinib (Glivec) and the copy version of the drug (Imatib). The exact reasons for the observed difference in clinical efficacy are unknown, but likely relate to the use of alternative polymorphic forms of the drug. Glivec can be obtained directly from the manufacturer (Novartis Pharmaceuticals) through a variety of patient access programs that should be fully explored when needed.
Keywords
Imatinib Imatib Glivec CMLNotes
Acknowledgments
Financial support for medical editorial assistance was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The authors thank Erinn Goldman, PhD (Articulate Science) and Helen Leather, PhD (Articulate Science) for medical editorial assistance with this manuscript.
References
- 1.Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Simonsson B, Appelbaum F, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108:1809–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: chronic myelogenous leukemia. v3:2008.Google Scholar
- 3.Rowley JD. Letter: a new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature. 1973;243:290–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bartram CR, de Klein A, Hagemeijer A, van Agthoven T, Geurts vK, Bootsma D, et al. Translocation of c-ab1 oncogene correlates with the presence of a Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 1983;306:277–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Buchdunger E, Zimmermann J, Mett H, Meyer T, Muller M, Druker BJ, et al. Inhibition of the Abl protein-tyrosine kinase in vitro and in vivo by a 2-phenylaminopyrimidine derivative. Cancer Res. 1996;56:100–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.O’Brien SG, Meinhardt P, Bond E, Beck J, Peng B, Dutreix C, et al. Effects of imatinib mesylate (STI571, Glivec) on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, a cytochrome p450 3A4 substrate, in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1855–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2408–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Gleevec Prescribing Information. 2007.Google Scholar
- 9.Glowienke S, Frieauff W, Allmendinger T, Martus HJ, Suter W, Mueller L. Structure-activity considerations and in vitro approaches to assess the genotoxicity of 19 methane-, benzene- and toluenesulfonic acid esters. Mutat Res. 2005;581:23–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar