Advertisement

Petroleum Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 363–375 | Cite as

The tectonic fracture modeling of an ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir based on an outcrop analogy: A case study in the Wangyao Oilfield of Ordos Basin, China

  • Xiaoming ZhaoEmail author
  • Li Liu
  • Jialiang Hu
  • Xiaojun Zhou
  • Min Li
Article

Abstract

Due to inherent limits of data acquisition and geophysical data resolution, there are large uncertainties in the characterization of subsurface fractures. However, outcrop analogies can provide qualitative and quantitative information on a large number of fractures, based on which the accuracy of subsurface fracture characterization can be improved. Here we take the tectonic fracture modeling of an ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir based on an outcrop analogy, a case study of the Chang611 Formation of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Group of the Wangyao Oilfield in the Ordos Basin of China. An outcrop at the edge of the basin is a suitable analog for the reservoir, but the prerequisite is that they must have equivalent previous stress fields, similar final structural characteristics, relative timing and an identical depositional environment and diagenesis. The relationship among fracture density, rock type and bed thickness based on the outcrop is one of the most important fracture distribution models, and can be used to interpret fracture density in individual wells quantitatively. Fracture orientation, dip, geometry and scale, also should be described and measured in the outcrop, and can be used together with structure restoration and single well fracture density interpretation to guide fracture intensity prediction on bed surfaces and to constrain the construction of the 3D fracture geometry model of the subsurface reservoir. The application of the above principles shows the outcrop-based tectonic fracture models of the target ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir are consistent with fractures inferred from microseismic interpretation and tracer tests. This illustrated that the fracture modeling based on the outcrop analogy is reliable and can reduce the uncertainty in stochastic fracture modeling.

Key words

Ultra-low permeability sandstone tectonic fracture modeling outcrop analog subsurface reservoir 3D modeling 

References

  1. Allwardt P F N, Bellahsen N, and Pollard D D. Curvature and fracturing based on global positioning system data collected at Sheep Mountain anticline, Wyoming. Geosphere. 2007. 3(6): 408–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton C A, Zoback M D and Moos D. Fluid flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rock. Geology. 1995. 23(8): 683–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belayneh M W, Matthäi S K, Blunt M J, et al. Comparison of deterministic with stochastic fracture models in water-flooding numerical simulations. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(11): 1633–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dang B, Zhao H, Li W H, et al. Characteristic of sedimentary microfacies in Chang 6 oil-bearing formation of Yanchang Formation of Ansai oil field. Natural Gas Geoscience. 2004. 15(6): 597–600 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Deng S G, Fan Y R, Li Z Q, et al. Response characteristics of array lateral logs and their primary inversion in reservoirs with fracture-induced anisotropy Petroleum Science. 2011. 8(1): 11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng S G, Wang Y, Hu Y Y, et al. Integrated petrophysical log characterization for tight carbonate reservoir effectiveness: A case study from the Longgang area, Sichuan Basin, China. Petroleum Science. 2013. 10(3): 336–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dershowitz B and Miller I. Dual porosity fracture flow and transport. Geophysical Research Letters. 1995. 22(11): 1441–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durand-Riard P, Caumon G and Muron P. Balanced restoration of geological volumes using relaxed meshing constraints. Computers and Geosciences. 2010. 36(4): 441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer M P and Wilkerson M S. Predicting the orientation of joints from fold shape: Results of pseudo-three-dimensional modeling and curvature analysis. Geology. 2000. 28(1): 15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gauthier B D M and Lake S D. Probabilistic modeling of faults below the limit of seismic resolution in Pelican field, North Sea, offshore United Kingdom. AAPG Bulletin. 1993. 77(5): 761–777Google Scholar
  11. Ge M C. Efficient mine microseismic monitoring. International Journal of Coal Geology. 2005. 64(1/2): 44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh K and Mitra S. Structural controls of fracture orientations, intensity, and connectivity, Teton anticline, Sawtooth Range, Montana. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(8): 995–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths P, Jones S, Salter N, et al. A new technique for 3-D flexural-slip restoration in fault-related folds: The transition from 2-D to 3-D. Journal of Structural Geology. 2002. 24(4): 773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo Y Q, Li W H, Chen Q H, et al. Oil accumulation factors of Chang 6 oil reservoir of Yanchang Formation of Upper Triassic in Ansai Oilfield. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition). 2006. 36(4): 639–642 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Hancock P L. Brittle microtectonics: principles and practice. Journal of Structural Geology. 1985. 7(3–4): 437–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He Z X. The Tectonic Evolution and Petroleum in the Ordos Basin. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 2002. 390 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Hennings P H, Olson J E and Thompson L B. Combining outcrop data and three-dimensional structural models to characterize fractured reservoirs: An example from Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin. 2000. 84(6): 830–849Google Scholar
  18. Hennings P. AAPG-SPE-SEG Hedberg research conference on “The Geologic Occurrence and Hydraulic Significance of Fractures in Reservoirs”. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(11): 1407–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hou B, Chen M, Wang Z, et al. Hydraulic fracture initiation theory for a horizontal well in a coal seam. Petroleum Science. 2013. 10(2): 219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins C, Ouenes A, Zellou A, et al. Quantifying and predicting naturally fractured reservoir behavior with continuous fracture models. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(11): 1597–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lange A G. Assisted history matching for the characterization of fractured reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(11): 1609–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laubach S E. Practical approaches to identifying sealed and open fractures. AAPG Bulletin. 2003. 87(4): 561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laubach S E, Reed R M, Olson J E, et al. Coevolution of crack-seal texture and fracture porosity in sedimentary rocks: Cathodoluminescence observations of regional fractures. Journal of Structural Geology. 2004. 26(5): 967–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leng D F, Wang X J, Chen T S, et al. Sedimentary microfacies and hydrocarbon distribution in the lower member of the Chang-6 oil measures in the Wangyao-Houshui-Xinghe-Pingqiao zone, Ansai OilField, Shaanxi. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology. 2010. 30(1): 49–53 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Li M, Jiang B, Lin S F, et al. Structural controls on coalbed methane reservoirs in Faer Coal Mine, Southwest China. Journal of Earth Science. 2013. 24(3): 437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lisle R J. Detection of zones of abnormal strains in structures using Gaussian curvature analysis. AAPG Bulletin. 1994. 78(12): 1811–1819Google Scholar
  27. Liu L F, Sam Z D, Yang H J, et al. Seismic attributes and integrated prediction of fractured and caved carbonate reservoirs in the Tarim Basin, China. Petroleum Science. 2011. 8(4): 455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorenz J C, Cooper S P and Olsson W A. Natural fracture distributions in sinuous, channel-fill sandstones of the Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah. AAPG Bulletin. 2006. 90(9): 1293–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lorenz J C, Sterling J L, Schechter D S, et al. Natural fractures in the Spraberry Formation, Midland Basin, Texas: The effects of mechanical stratigraphy on fracture variability and reservoir behavior. AAPG Bulletin. 2002. 86(3): 505–524Google Scholar
  30. Luo J L, Morad S, Salem A, et al. Impact of diagenesis and reservoir quality evolution in fluvial and lacustrine-deltaic sandstones: evidence from Jurassic and Triassic sandstones from the Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Geology. 2009. 32(1): 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maerten L and Maerten F Chronologic modeling of faulted and fractured reservoirs using geomechanically based restoration: Technique and industry applications. AAPG Bulletin. 2006. 90(8): 1201–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxwell S C and Urbancic T I. The role of passive microseismic monitoring in the instrumented oil field. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 2001. 20(6): 636–639Google Scholar
  33. McLennan J A, Allwardt P F, Hennings P H, et al. Multivariate fracture intensity prediction: Application to Oil Mountain anticline, Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(11): 1585–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mu L X, Zhao G L, Tian Z Y, et al. Reservoir Fractures Prediction. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 2009. 83 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Narr W. Fracture density in the deep subsurface: Techniques with application to Point Arguello oil field. AAPG Bulletin. 1991. 75(8): 1300–1323Google Scholar
  36. Nelson R A. Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company. 1985. 12–17Google Scholar
  37. Olson J E, Laubach S E and Lander R H. Natural fracture characterization in tight gas sandstones: Integrating mechanics and diagenesis. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(11): 1535–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ortega R J, Marrett R A and Laubach S E. A scale-independent approach to fracture intensity and average spacing measurement. AAPG Bulletin. 2006. 90(2): 193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pater C J, Groenenboom J, Dam D B, et al. Active seismic monitoring of hydraulic fractures in laboratory experiments. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2001. 38(6): 777–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rouby D, Xiao H and Suppe J. 3-D restoration of complexly folded and faulted surfaces using multiple unfolding mechanisms. AAPG Bulletin. 2000. 84(6): 805–829Google Scholar
  41. Sam Z S, Zhou X Y, Yang H J, et al. Fractured reservoir modeling by discrete fracture network and seismic modeling in the Tarim Basin, China. Petroleum Science. 2011. 8(4): 433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang L, Li W H, Lin T, et al. Diagenesis and its influencing factors of Chang6 interval of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography. 2012. 14(3): 311–320 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Wu S H. Reservoir Characterization and Modeling. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 2010. 163 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Xu C Q and Huang X. Research on seismic field data acquisition method in loess tableland ravine area. Coal Geology of China. 2009. 21(2): 70–74 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Yan T, Li W and Bi X L. An experimental study of fracture initiation mechanisms during hydraulic fracturing. Petroleum Science. 2011. 8(1): 87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yielding G, Needham T and Jones H. Sampling of fault populations using sub-surface data: A review. Journal of Structural Geology. 1996. 18(2–3): 135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yuan S Y, Song X M and Ran Q Q. Development Technology of Fractured Reservoirs. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 2004. 336 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. Zeng L B. A study of fracture and its seepage characteristics in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs. Scientia Geologica Sinica. 2004. 39(1): 11–17 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  49. Zeng L B, Gao C Y, Qi J F, et al. The distribution rule and seepage effect of the fractures in the ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir in east Gansu Province, Ordos Basin. Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences). 2008. 51(Supp. II): 44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zeng L B and Li X Y Fractures in sandstone reservoirs with ultra-low permeability: A case study of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin, China. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. 93(4): 461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zeng L B, Li Z X, Shi C E, et al. Characteristics and origin of fractures in the sandstone reservoirs of ultra-low permeability of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2007. 81(2): 174–180 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  52. Zhang C M, He Z M, Wang Z Q, et al. Non-flattening delta front sheet sand-Evidence from outcrops and subsurface. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute. 2003. 25(3): 1–4 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Zhang L. Characteristics of reservoir fracture and the analysis of stress field in Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Basin. Geological Science and Technology Information. 2003. 22(2): 21–24 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  54. Zhang Y L. Distribution and predication of tectonic fracture for Chang6 reservoir in Yanhewan explorative area in Ansai Oilfield [Ms.D thesis]. Beijing, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. 2007. 21–23 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Zhao M W, Behr H J, Ahrendt H, et al. Thermal and tectonic history of the Ordos Basin, China: evidence from apatite fission track analysis, vitrinite reflectance, and K-Ar dating. AAPG Bulletin. 1996. 80(7): 1110–1134Google Scholar
  56. Zhao W B. Study on reservoir features and fracture of Yanchang Formation, Triassic in the central region of Ordos Basin [Ms.D thesis]. Xi’an, Northwest University. 2008. 10 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  57. Zhou D Q, Chen F, Cao P, et al. Analysis of fracture process zone in brittle rock subjected to shear-compressive loading. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2005. 12(2): 209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Authors 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoming Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Li Liu
    • 1
  • Jialiang Hu
    • 3
  • Xiaojun Zhou
    • 1
  • Min Li
    • 4
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Geology of Sichuan ProvinceSouthwest Petroleum UniversitySichuanChina
  2. 2.School of Geoscience and TechnologySouthwest Petroleum UniversitySichuanChina
  3. 3.Abu Dhabi National Oil CompanyAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationSouthwest Petroleum UniversitySichuanChina

Personalised recommendations