Petroleum Science

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 70–78 | Cite as

Classification of carbonate gas condensate reservoirs using well test and production data analyses

  • Yong Li
  • Baozhu Li
  • Yongle Hu
  • Jing Xia
  • Zhaowei Liu
  • Xingliang Deng
  • Zhicheng She
  • Kun Fan
Article

Abstract

Carbonate reservoir patterns play an important role in the production performance of oil and gas wells, and it is usually classified through static data analysis which cannot reflect the actual well performance. This paper takes the Tazhong No. 1 gas field in the Tarim Basin, China as an example to investigate the classification of carbonate reservoirs. The classification method mainly combines well test analysis with production analysis — especially the Blasingame type curve method. Based on the characteristics of type curves for well test analysis and the Blasingame method, the relationship between the type curves and reservoir pattern was established. More than 20 wells were analyzed and the reservoirs were classified into 3 major patterns with 7 sub-classes. Furthermore, the classification results were validated by dynamic performance analysis of wells in the Tazhong No.1 gas field. On the basis of the classification results, well stimulation (i.e. water flooding in a single well) was carried out in three volatile-oil wells, and the oil recovery increased by up to 20%.

Key words

Carbonate reservoir pattern well test analysis production analysis type curve 

References

  1. Agarwal R G, Gardner D C, Kleinsteiber S W, et al. Analyzing well production data using combined type curve and decline curve concepts. Paper SPE 57916 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 27–30 September 1998, New Orleans, LouisianaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson D M and Mattar L. Practical diagnostics using production data and flowing pressures. Paper SPE 89939 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26–29 September 2004, Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson D M, Stotts G W J, Mattar L, et al. Production data analysis — Challenges, pitfalls, diagnostics. Paper SPE 102048 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24–27 September 2006, San Antonio, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bello R O and Wattenbarger R A. Rate transient analysis in naturally fractured shale gas reservoirs. Paper SPE 114591 presented at CIPC/ SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference, 16–19 June 2008, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. Blasingame T A, Johnston J L and Lee W J. Type-curve analysis using the pressure integral method. Paper SPE 18799 SPE presented at California Regional Meeting, 5–7 April 1989, Bakersfield, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Blasingame T A, McCray T L and Lee W J. Decline curve analysis for variable pressure drop/variable flowrate systems. Paper SPE 21513 presented at SPE Gas Technology Symposium, 22–24 January 1991, Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  7. Borch C. Applied multisource pressure data integration for dynamic reservoir characterization, reservoir, and production management: A case history from the Siri field, offshore Denmark. Paper SPE 71629 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September–3 October 2001, New Orleans, LouisianaGoogle Scholar
  8. Doublet L E, Pande P K, Clark M B, Nevans J W, et al. An integrated geologic and engineering reservoir characterization of the North Robertson (Clearfork) Unit: A case study. Part 1. Paper SPE 29594 presented at Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, 19–22 March 1995, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  9. Escobar F H, Garcia-Rocha H, Suaza I M, et al. Well pressure behavior for a vertical well in a gas condensate naturally-fractured reservoir. Paper SPE 107721 presented at Latin American & Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 15–18 April 2007, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  10. Fetkovich M J. Decline curve analysis using type curves. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1980. 32(6): 1065–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gringarten A C, Bozorgzadeh M, Daungkaew S, et al. Well test analysis in lean gas condensate reservoirs: Theory and practice. Paper SPE 100993 presented at SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, 3–6 October 2006, Moscow, RussiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Han Y X, Zhuang H N and Sun H D. Application of a numerical well test analysis technique in gas reservoir characterization. Well Test. 2006. 15(2): 9–11 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Li Y, Li B Z, Hu Y L, et al. The application of modern production decline analysis in the dynamic analysis of gas condensate reservoirs. Natural Gas Geoscience. 2009a. 20(2): 304–308 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Li Y, Li B Z, Hu Y L, et al. The application of single-well production analysis for carbonate gas condensate reservoirs. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency. 2009b. 16(5): 79–81 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Mattar L and Anderson D M. A systematic and comprehensive methodology for advanced analysis of production data. Paper SPE 84472 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5–8 October 2003, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  16. Mattar L and McNeil R. The flowing gas material balance. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 1998. 37(2): 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rushing J A and Blasingame T A. Integrating short-term pressure buildup testing and long-term production data analysis to evaluate hydraulically-fractured gas well performance. Paper SPE 84475 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5–8 October 2003, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  18. Wehner S C, Raines M A, Davis T L, et al. Dynamic reservoir characterization at Central Vacuum Unit. Paper SPE 63134 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1–4 October 2000, Dallas, TexasGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Li
    • 1
  • Baozhu Li
    • 1
  • Yongle Hu
    • 1
  • Jing Xia
    • 1
  • Zhaowei Liu
    • 2
  • Xingliang Deng
    • 3
  • Zhicheng She
    • 3
  • Kun Fan
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and DevelopmentPetroChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.China National Oil & Gas Exploration and Development CorporationPetroChinaBeijingChina
  3. 3.Tarim Oilfield CompanyPetroChinaKorla, XingjiangChina

Personalised recommendations