Advertisement

Petroleum Science

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 8–16 | Cite as

Experimental study on interaction between simulated sandstone and acidic fluid

  • Yongwang ZhangEmail author
  • Jianhui Zeng
  • Bingsong Yu
Article

Abstract

In order to investigate the controlling mechanism of temperature, fluid and other factors on water-rock interaction in the diagenetic process, we performed a series of simulated experiments on the interaction between two kinds of fluids with different salinity and a composite mineral system (simulated sandstone), which contains albite, K-feldspar and other minerals. The experimental results showed that acidity was the most important factor that affected the dissolution of minerals in the composite mineral system. The lower the pH value, the more easily the minerals dissolved. At the same pH value, the dissolution abilities of different acids for various mineral components were also different. Compared to hydrochloric acid (inorganic acid), oxalic acid (organic acid) was more able to dissolve aluminosilicate minerals. However, the dissolution ability of oxalic acid for carbonate minerals was lower than that of hydrochloric acid. In the process of fluid-rock interaction, dissolution of feldspar was relatively complicated. Increase of temperature would accelerate the dissolution of feldspar. Under acidic conditions, albite had a higher dissolution rate than K-feldspar. K-feldspar could dissolve and convert into montmorillonite and kaolinite, while albite could dissolve and convert into kaolinite both at 40°C and 80°C. Presence of organic acid, and decrease of pH value and water salinity were all favorable for the dissolution of feldspar, but weakened the ability to form clay minerals.

Key words

Fluid simulated sandstone dissolution static experiment 

References

  1. Anjos S M C, De Ros L F, De Souza R S, et al. Depositional and diagenetic control on the reservoir quality of Lower Cretaceous Pendencia sandstones, Potiguar Rift Basin, Brazil. AAPG Bulletin. 2000. 84(11): 1719–1742Google Scholar
  2. Blake R E and Walter L M. Effects of organic acids on the dissolution of orthoclase at 80°C and pH 6. Chemical Geology. 1996. 132(1–4):91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake R E and Walter L M. Kinetics of feldspar and quartz dissolution at 70–80°C and near-neutral pH: effects of organic acids and NaCl. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1999. 63(13–14): 2043–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brantley S L. Kinetics of dissolution and precipitation: experimental and field results. In: Proc. 7th Int. Symp.: Water-Rock Interaction (Edited by Welch S A and Ullman W J). Park City, US: A. A. Balkema. 1992. 3–6Google Scholar
  5. Chardon E S, Livens F R and Vaughan D J. Reactions of feldspar surfaces with aqueous solutions. Earth-Science Reviews. 2006. 78(1–2): 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C P, Mei B W and Mao Z C. The initial experimental study for dissolving silicate mineral by dicarboxylic acid in aqueous systems. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology. 1993. 13(1): 103–107 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Chen L H, Zhao C L, Ji Y L, et al. Three formation mechanisms of secondary porosity in clastic gas reservoir rocks. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 1999. 26(5): 77–79 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Dillon C G, Worden R H and Barclay S A. Simulations of the effects of diagenesis on the evolution of sandstone porosity. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 2004. 74(6): 877–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellmann R. The albite-water system: Part I. The kinetics of dissolution as a function of pH at 100, 200, and 300°C. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1994. 58(2): 595–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang S J, Yang J J, Zhang W Z, et al. Experimental study of feldspar dissolution by acetic acid at different burial temperatures. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica. 1995. 13(1): 7–16 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Ji H C and Xu Z. Experimental simulation for dissolution in clastic reservoirs of the deep zone. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2007. 81(2):212–219 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Liu M H and Zhao C L. Diagenesis Evolutionary Model of Clastic Rocks. Dongying, Shandong: China University of Petroleum Press. 1993. 30–45 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Li W G, Zhang X P and Zhong Y M. Formation mechanism of secondary dissolved pores in arcose. Oil and Gas Geology. 2005. 26(2): 220–229Google Scholar
  14. Megahan W F and Clayton J L. Saturated hydraulic conductivities of granitic materials of the Idaho batholith. Journal of Hydrology. 1986. 84(1–2): 167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oelkers E H and Schott J. Experimental study of anorthite dissolution and the relative mechanism of feldspar hydrolysis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1995. 59(24): 5039–5053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Qiu Y N, Xue S H and Ying F X. Continental Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in China. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press. 1997. 147–217 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Shah B A and Bandyopadhyay D N. Feldspar alteration and diagenetic characteristics of the Parsora sandstones, Son Basin, India. Gondwana Research. 2005. 8(2): 258–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi J A, Jin H J and Xue L H. An analysis on mechanism of feldspar dissolution and its influence in feldspar-rich sandstone reservoir. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica. 1994. 12(3): 67–74 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Wollast R and Chou L. Surface reactions during the early stages of weathering of albite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1992. 56(8): 3113–3121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiang T S, Cai C F and Fu H E. Dissolution of microcline by carboxylic acids at different temperatures and complexing reaction of Al anion with carboxylic acid in aqueous solution. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica. 2004. 22(4): 597–602 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Xiao Y, Wang R C, Lu X C, et al. Experimental study on the low-temperature dissolution of microperthite in alkaline solution. Acta Mineralogica Sinica. 2003. 23(4): 333–339 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Yang J J, Huang Y M, Zhang W Z, et al. Experimental approach of dissolution of feldspar sandstone by acetic acid. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 1995. 22(4): 82–86 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and ProspectingChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  2. 2.Basin and Reservoir Research CenterChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral ResourcesChina University of GeosciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations