Advertisement

Petroleum Science

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 388–394 | Cite as

GTL or LNG: which is the best way to monetize “stranded” natural gas?

  • Lichun Dong
  • Shun’an Wei
  • Shiyu Tan
  • Hongjing Zhang
Article

Abstract

A large portion of world’s natural gas reserves are “stranded” resources, the drive to monetize these resources leads to the development of gas-to-liquids (GTL) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) technologies. LNG has the advantage of having been developed for the past 40 years and having an excellent safety record. GTL on the other hand is another option with substantial benefits, but its development stage and commercial viability are far behind LNG. This paper presents a techno-economic comparison of GTL with LNG, including technical development, plant efficiency, market potential for the products, and capital cost for the infrastructure. The aim is to give an overall view on both LNG and GTL and provide a perspective on the profitability of these two technologies.

Key words

GTL (gas to liquids) LNG (liquefied natural gas) “stranded” natural gas 

References

  1. Antari A, Mokrani T. Gas to liquids technology—A new approach for marketing natural gas. 17th World Petroleum Congress, Rio De Janeiro, 2002. Block 3/Forum 18/Paper 12Google Scholar
  2. Bakkerud P K. Update on synthesis gas production for GTL. Catalysis Today. 2005. 106: 30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Z. The 17th World Petroleum Congress’ view on natural gas development and utilization. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals. 2003. 34(4): 1–6 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Fleisch T H, Sills R A and Briscoe M D. Emergence of the gas-to-liquids industry: A review of global GTL developments. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry. 2002. 11: 1–14Google Scholar
  5. Han D, Pan J and Jiang J. Progress of making synthetic oil from natural gas and its technico-economic analysis, Chemical Technology Market. 2006. 29(6): 27–41 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Heng H C and Idrus S. The future of gas to liquids as a gas monetisation option. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry. 2004. 13: 63–70Google Scholar
  7. Hu J, Zhu B and Wang J. Natural gas chemical technology and application. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Kashav T S and Basu S. Gas-to-liquid technologies: India’s perspective. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007. 88: 493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Patel B. Gas Monetisation: A technico-economic comparison of gasto liquids and LNG. 7th World Congress of Chemical Engineering. Glasgow. 2005Google Scholar
  10. Pyrdol J and Baron B. What is more profitable to build: GTL production facilities or LNG liquefaction plants. Presented at World Natural Gas Market and Trade (EMF-23), Berlin Meeting. June 2006.Google Scholar
  11. Qian B and Zhu J. Status and development trend of natural gas compound. Natural Gas and Oil. 2007. 25(4): 23–28 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Sie S T. Process development and scale up: IV case history of the development of a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis process. Reviews in Chemical Engineering. 1998. 14: 109–157Google Scholar
  13. Smith R M. New developments in gas to liquids technology. Presented at CERI 2004 Petrochemical Conference. Delta Lodge at Kananaskis, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang Y. The opportunity, risk, and challenge in LNG industry. International Petroleum Economics. 2005. 13(6): 39–43 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Yang G and Wang X. Liquefaction technology of natural gas. Natural Gas and Oil. 2005. 23(2): 10–16 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Yao G. Development of GTL and related technico-economic analysis, International Petroleum Economics. 2005. 13(5): 23–29 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Zeng H. Trends of development in the global LNG market. International Petroleum Economics, 2006. 14(6): 53–56 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Zhang K and Pang M. The present and future of the world’s LNG industry. International Petroleum Economics. 2005. 13(10): 55–59 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lichun Dong
    • 1
  • Shun’an Wei
    • 1
  • Shiyu Tan
    • 1
  • Hongjing Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations