Evaluation and prevention of formation damage in offshore sandstone reservoirs in China
Abstract
Reduction in water injectivity would be harmful to the waterflood development of offshore sandstone oil reservoirs. In this paper the magnitude of formation damage during water injection was evaluated by analyzing the performance of water injection in the Bohai offshore oilfield, China. Two parameters, permeability reduction and rate of wellhead pressure rise, were proposed to evaluate the formation damage around injection wells. The pressure performance curve could be divided into three stages with different characteristics. Analysis of field data shows that formation damage caused by water injection was severe in some wells in the Bohai offshore oilfield, China. In the laboratory, the content of clay minerals in reservoir rock was analyzed and sensitivity tests (including sensitivity to water, flow rate, alkali, salt and acid) were also conducted. Experimental results show that the reservoir had a strong to medium sensitivity to water (i.e. clay swelling) and a strong to medium sensitivity to flow rate, which may cause formation damage. For formation damage prevention, three injection schemes of clay stabilizer (CS) were studied, i.e. continuous injection of low concentration CS (CI), slug injection of high concentration CS (SI), and slug injection of high concentration CS followed by continuous injection of low concentration CS (SI-CI). Core flooding experiments show that SI-CI is an effective scheme to prevent formation damage and is recommended for the sandstone oil reservoirs in the Bohai offshore oilfield during water injection.
Key words
Sandstone reservoir formation damage water injection clay stabilizerReferences
- Al-Hamadah A M. Factors affecting injectivity decline. 1995. SPE paper 29893Google Scholar
- Bedrikovetsky P G, Fonseca D R, da Silva M J, et al. Well-history-based prediction of injectivity decline during seawater flooding. 2005. SPE paper 93885Google Scholar
- Chang F F and Civan F. Practical model for chemically induced formation damage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 1997. 17: 123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Civan F. Interpretation and correlations of clay swelling measurements. 1999. SPE paper 52134Google Scholar
- Civan F. Water sensitivity and swelling characteristics of petroleum-bearing formations: Kinetics and correlation. 2001. SPE paper 67293Google Scholar
- Leone J A and Scott M E. Characterization and control of formation damage during water flooding of a high-clay-content reservoir. 1988. SPE paper 16234Google Scholar
- Moghadasi J, Muller-Steinhagen H, Jamialahma-di M, et al. Theoretical and experimental study of particle movement and deposition in porous media during water injection. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2004. 43: 163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Molenaar M M and Huyghe J M. A constitutive model for swelling shales. 1996. SPE/ISRM paper 47332Google Scholar
- Nasr-El-Din H A, A1-Mulhem A A and Lynn J D. Evaluation of clay stabilizers for a sandstone field in central Saudi Arabia. 1998. SPE paper 39584Google Scholar
- Norman C A and Smith J E. Experience gained from 318 injection well KOH clay stabilization treatments. 2000. SPE paper 60307Google Scholar
- Sharma M M and Pang S. Injectivity decline in water injection wells: An offshore Gulf of Mexico case study. 1997. SPE paper 38180Google Scholar
- Xiong H and Holditch S A. A comprehensive approach to formation damage diagnosis and corresponding stimulation type and fluid selection. 1995. SPE paper 29513Google Scholar