Download PDF

Petroleum Science

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 56–61 | Cite as

Micro-mechanisms of residual oil mobilization by viscoelastic fluids

Article
First Online:
Received:

Abstract

Four typical types of residual oil, residual oil trapped in dead ends, oil ganglia in pore throats, oil at pore corners and oil film adhered to pore walls, were studied. According to main pore structure characteristics and the fundamental morphological features of residual oil, four displacement models for residual oil were proposed, in which pore-scale flow behavior of viscoelastic fluid was analyzed by a numerical method and micro-mechanisms for mobilization of residual oil were discussed. Calculated results indicate that the viscoelastic effect enhances micro displacement efficiency and increases swept volume. For residual oil trapped in dead ends, the flow field of viscoelastic fluid is developed in dead ends more deeply, resulting in more contact with oil by the displacing fluid, and consequently increasing swept volume. In addition, intense viscoelastic vortex has great stress, under which residual oil becomes small oil ganglia, and finally be carried into main channels. For residual oil at pore throats, its displacement mechanisms are similar to the oil trapped in dead ends. Vortices are developed in the depths of the throats and oil ganglia become smaller. Besides, viscoelastic fluid causes higher pressure drop on oil ganglia, as a driving force, which can overcome capillary force, consequently, flow direction can be changed and the displacing fluid enter smaller throats. For oil at pore corners, viscoelastic fluid can enhance displacement efficiency as a result of greater velocity and stress near the corners. For residual oil adhered to pore wall, viscoelastic fluid can provide a greater displacing force on the interface between viscoelastic fluid and oil, thus, making it easier to exceed the minimum interfacial tension for mobilizing the oil film.

Key words

Viscoelastic chemical flooding displacement mechanism residual oil swept volume 
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. Barnes A L. The use of a viscous slug to improve waterflood efficiency in a reservoir partially invaded by bottom water. JPT. 1962. 14(10):1147–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cochrane T, Walters K and Webster M F. Newtonian and non-Newtonian flow near a reentrant corner. J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech. 1982. 10: 95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daubend Jr D L and Menzie D E. Flow of polymer solutions through porous media. JPT. 1967. 19(8): 1065–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Han X Q, Wang W Y and Xu Y. The viscoelastic behavior of HPAM solutions in porous media and its effects on displacement efficiency. International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering held in Beijing, China, 14–17 November, 1995 (SPE paper 30013)Google Scholar
  5. Hester R D, Flesher L M and McCormick C L. Polymer solution extension viscosity effects during reservoir flooding. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 17–20 April, 1994 (SPE/DOE paper 27823)Google Scholar
  6. Kong F S, Wang X L and Xia H F. Microcosmic displacement mechanism of viscoelastic polymer solution displacing the residual oil at the dead end. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing. 2007. 20(5): 110–113 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Мархасин И Л апd Рстрокина В, Методика И Реэультаты Послойного Иэучения Граничного Слоя Нефти На Контакте С Твердой Поверхностью. Нефть И Гаэ. 1973. (5): 83–86 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Mohammad R, Juergen R, Guenter P, et al. Quantification and optimization of viscoelastic effects of polymer solutions for enhanced oil recovery. SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 22–24 April, 1992 (SPE/ DOE paper 24154)Google Scholar
  9. Pye D J. Improved secondary recovery by control of water mobility. JPT. 1964. 16(8): 911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ren K, Wang J L, Lin M Q, et al. Rheological properties of hydrophobically associating polyacrylamide solution. Petroleum Science. 2006. 3(2): 66–72Google Scholar
  11. Sandiford B B. Laboratory and field studies of water floods using polymer solutions to increase oil recoveries. JPT. 1964. 16(8): 917–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tong Z S, Yang C Z, Wu G Q, et al. A study of microscopic flooding mechanism of surfactant/alkali/polymer. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 19–22 April, 1998 (SPE/DOE paper 39662)Google Scholar
  13. Wang D M, Cheng J C, Xia H F, et al. Improvement of displacement efficiency of cores by driving forces parallel to the oil-water interface of viscous-elastic fluids. Acta Petrolei Sinica. 2002. 23(5): 48–52 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Wang D M, Cheng J C, Yang Q Y, et al. Viscous-elastic polymer can increase microsclae displacement efficiency in cores. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Dallas, Texas, USA,1–4 October, 2000 (SPE paper 63227)Google Scholar
  15. Wunderlich A M, Brunn P O and Durst F. Flow of dilute polyacrylamide solutions through a sudden planar contraction. J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech. 1988. 28: 267–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang Q Y, Gong W C and Jia Z W. Experimental study on oil displacement efficiency of produced fluids and reformulated system of ASP flooding. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing. 1999. 18(3): 24–26 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Zhang L J, Yue X A, Liu Z C, et al. Percolation mechanism of polymer solution through porous media. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural science). 2005. 29(1): 51–55 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Petroleum 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Petroleum EngineeringMinistry of Education, China University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  2. 2.Development DepartmentSinopec Exploration and Production Research InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations