Literatur
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Andò G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Galli M, Colangelo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, de Cesare N, Rigattieri S, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbühler M, Vranckx P, Jüni P, MATRIX Investigators (2015) Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 385(9986):2465–2476
Bauer T, Hochadel M, Brachmann J, Schächinger V, Boekstegers P, Zrenner B, Zahn R, Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) (2015) Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86(Suppl 1):S8–S14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
H. Eggebrecht gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eggebrecht, H. Retroperitoneales Hämatom nach Koronarintervention – gefährlich und vermeidbar!. Kardiologe 12, 178–179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-018-0246-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-018-0246-5