Der Kardiologe

, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp 375–387 | Cite as

Konsensuspapier „Peri- und postinterventioneller Schlaganfall bei Herzkatheterprozeduren“

  • J. Röther
  • U. Laufs
  • M. Böhm
  • S. Willems
  • B. Scheller
  • M. Borggrefe
  • H. Darius
  • M. Endres
  • U. Zeymer
  • H.-C. Diener
  • M. Grond
  • W. Hacke
  • M. Forsting
  • M. Schumacher
  • M. Hennerici
Konsensuspapiere

Zusammenfassung

Periinterventionelle Schlaganfälle sind eine der häufigsten schweren Komplikationen bei Katheterinterventionen und der Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern und Kammertachykardien mit einer großen Wahrscheinlichkeit persistierender neurologischer Defizite. Da viele dieser zerebrovaskulären Komplikationen auf dem Kathetertisch auftreten, bietet sich die Möglichkeit einer akuten Intervention mit dem Ziel der Gefäßrekanalisation. Eine sofortige zerebrale Bildgebung und ein interdisziplinäres Vorgehen ohne Zeitverzug sind für jedes Herzkatheterlabor zu fordern. Liegt ein Gefäßverschluss zugrunde, so ist eine intraarterielle Thrombolyse, ggf. mit einer mechanischen Thrombusextraktion, die erfolgversprechendste Therapie. Allerdings handelt es sich um eine individuelle Therapieentscheidung, die von der lokalen interdisziplinären Fachkompetenz abhängt. Das erhöhte Risiko einer intrazerebralen Blutung aufgrund der im Regelfall vorbestehenden antithrombotischen Therapie muss gegen das drohende neurologische Defizit abgewogen werden. Aufgrund der hohen Morbidität und der verschiedenen potenziellen Therapieoptionen besteht der dringende Bedarf für systematische klinische Studien.

Schlüsselwörter

Periprozeduraler Schlaganfall Periinterventionelle Komplikationen Akutes Koronarsyndrom Katheterablation Thrombolyse 

Consensus paper on peri-interventional and postinterventional stroke during cardiac catheter procedures

Abstract

Stroke is a serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation ablation procedures and patients have a high likelihood of persistent neurological deficits. Although formal criteria speak against intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis due to pre-existing antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy, the conditions for recanalizing therapy are optimal due to the occurrence of vessel occlusion in the catheter suite or the chest pain unit. Brain imaging and an interdisciplinary approach are mandatory. In cases of intracerebral vessel occlusion intra-arterial thrombolysis possibly in combination with mechanical clot fragmentation is the first choice therapy. The management of the patient is always an individual therapeutic decision based on stroke severity, the pre-treatment with antithrombotic and anticoagulation drugs, the availability of a neuro-interventionalist and the qualification of the local team.

Keywords

Periprocedural stroke Percutaneous coronary intervention Acute coronary syndrome Atrial fibrillation ablation procedure Thrombolysis 

Notes

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Adams HP Jr, Effron MB, Torner J et al (2008) Emergency administration of abciximab for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke: results of an international phase III trial: Abciximab in Emergency Treatment of Stroke Trial (AbESTT-II). Stroke 39:87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal A, Dai D, Rumsfeld JS et al (2009) on behalf of American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Incidence and predictors of stroke associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol (epub)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Mubarak N, Vitek JJ, Mousa I et al (2002) Immediate catheter-based neurovascular rescue for acute stroke complicating coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol 90:173–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amarenco P, Röther J, Michel P et al (2006) Aortic arch atheroma and the risk of stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep 8:343–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arnold M, Fischer U, Schroth G et al (2008) Intra-arterial thrombolysis of acute iatrogenic intracranial arterial occlusion attributable to neuroendovascular procedures or coronary angiography. Stroke 39:1491–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bertaglia E, Zoppo F, Tondo C et al (2007) Early complications of pulomary vein catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a multicenter prospective registry on procedural safety. Heart Rhythm 4:1265–1271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanc P, Boussuges A, Henriette K et al (2002) Iatrogenic cerebral air embolism: importance of an early hyperbaric oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 28:559–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonzel T, Erbel R, Hamm CW et al (2008) Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Clin Res Cardiol 97:513–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K et al (2008) The penumbra system: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1409–1413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brouns R, De Surgeloose D, Neetens I, De Deyn PP (2006) Fatal venous cerebral air embolism secondary to a disconnected central venous catheter. Cerebrovasc Dis 21:212–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Busing KA, Schulte-Sasse C, Fluchter S et al (2005) Cerebral infarction: incidence and risk factors after diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization – prospective evaluation at diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 235:177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL et al (2007) HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace 9:335–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cronin L, Mehta SR, Zhao F et al (2001) Stroke in relation to cardiac procedures in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a study involving >18 000 patients. Circulation 104:269–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dauerman HL (2008) Coronary intervention without a safety net. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1299–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Marco F, Antonio Fernandez-Diaz J, Lefevre T et al (2007) Management of cerebrovascular accidents during cardiac catheterization: immediate cerebral angiography versus early neuroimaging strategy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dukkipati S, O’Neill WW, Harjai KJ et al (2004) Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1161–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eckert B, Koch C, Thomalla G et al (2005) Aggressive therapy with intravenous abciximab and intra-arterial rtPA and additional PTA/stenting improves clinical outcome in acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: combined local fibrinolysis and intravenous abciximab in acute vertebrobasilar stroke treatment (FAST): results of a multicenter study. Stroke 36:1160–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eggebrecht H, Oldenburg O, Dirsch O et al (2000) Potential embolization by atherosclerotic debris dislodged from aortic wall during cardiac catheterization: histological and clinical findings in 7,621 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 49:389–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fuchs S, Stabile E, Kinnaird TD et al (2002) Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications. Circulation 106:86–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L et al (1999) Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 282:2003–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C et al (2004) Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet 363:768–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E et al (2008) Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamm CW, Albrecht A, Bonzel T et al (2008) Diagnostic heart catheterization. Clin Res Cardiol 97:475–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamon M, Baron JC, Viader F, Hamon M (2008) Periprocedural stroke and cardiac catheterization. Circulation 118:678–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamon M, Gomes S, Oppenheim C et al (2006) Cerebral microembolism during cardiac catheterization and risk of acute brain injury: a prospective diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 37:2035–2038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaps M, Hansen J, Weiher M et al (1997) Clinically silent microemboli in patients with artificial prosthetic aortic valves are predominantly gaseous and not solid. Stroke 28:322–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keeley EC, Grines CL (1998) Scraping of aortic debris by coronary guiding catheters: a prospective evaluation of 1,000 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1861–1865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khatri P, Taylor RA, Palumbo V et al (2008) The safety and efficacy of thrombolysis for strokes after cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:906–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuck KH, Ernst S, Dorwarth U et al (2007) Guidelines for catheter ablation. Clin Res Cardiol 96:833–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Levy EI, Mehta R, Gupta R et al (2007) Self-expanding stents for recanalization of acute cerebrovascular occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:816–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lickfett L, Hackenbroch M, Lewalter T et al (2006) Cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a tool to monitor the thrombogenicity of left atrial catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lutomsky B, Ernst S, Drewitz I et al (2008) Akutkomplikationen im Register zur Vorhofflimmerablation (AFNET B04) – Aus dem Kompetenznetzwerk Vorhofflimmern. Clin Res Cardiol 97:V336 (abs)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mattle HP, Arnold M, Georgiadis D et al (2008) Comparison of intraarterial and intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke with hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign. Stroke 39:379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Muir KW, Buchan A, von Kummer R et al (2006) Imaging of acute stroke. Lancet Neurol 5:755–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muth CM, Shank ES (2000) Gas embolism. N Engl J Med 342:476–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oezbek C, Heisel A, Voelk M et al (1995) Management of stroke complicating cardiac catheterization with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Am J Cardiol 76:733–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M et al (2003) Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361:1241–1246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oral H, Chugh A, Ozaydin M et al (2006) Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 114:759–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Qualitätssicherung QdB. 2007Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ren JF, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ et al (2005) Increased intensity of anticoagulation may reduce risk of thrombus during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16:474–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Röther J (2005) Stroke-mimicking conditions. In: von Kummer R, Back T (Hrsg) Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ischemic Stroke, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 285–291Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sandoval AE, Laufer N (1998) Thromboembolic stroke complicating coronary intervention: acute evaluation and management in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 44:412–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al (2007) Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wong SC, Minutello R, Hong MK (2005) Neurological complications following percutaneous coronary interventions (a report from the 2000-2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 96:1248–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Röther
  • U. Laufs
  • M. Böhm
  • S. Willems
  • B. Scheller
  • M. Borggrefe
  • H. Darius
  • M. Endres
  • U. Zeymer
  • H.-C. Diener
  • M. Grond
  • W. Hacke
  • M. Forsting
  • M. Schumacher
  • M. Hennerici

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations