Total ankle arthroplasty in end-stage ankle arthritis
- 279 Downloads
Recent advancements in ankle prosthesis design, combined with improved surgical techniques for correction of coronal plane deformity and ligamentous balancing, have led to a resurgence of interest in total ankle arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Although ankle arthrodesis has long been considered the gold standard treatment for ankle arthritis, recent studies have shown that patients who undergo total ankle replacement have equivalent pain relief and improved function, when compared with patients with an ankle fusion. The purpose of this review is to summarize the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical outcomes of some of the more commonly used modern prostheses for total ankle arthroplasty.
KeywordsAnkle arthritis Total ankle arthroplasty Total ankle replacement Mobile bearing Fixed bearing
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Constantine A. Demetracopoulos, James P. Halloran, Paul Maloof, Samuel B. Adams, Jr., and Selene G. Parekh declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 12.•• Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Berlet GC, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:579–96. This study was a prospective controlled trial comparing the STAR total ankle with ankle fusion for ankle arthritis. At 2-year follow-up, patients treated with the STAR total ankle had equal pain relief but improved function, when compared with patients who had an ankle fusion.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.• SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2143–9. This study utilized the California hospital discharge database to compare patients who underwent ankle arthroplasty and ankle fusion. Patients with an ankle replacement were at an increased risk for reoperation but were found to have a decreased risk of requiring a subtalar fusion during the 10-year study period.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.• Adams SB, Demetracopoulos CA, Queen RM, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Early to Mid-Term Outcomes of Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using a Modular Intramedullary Tibial Component. AOFAS Summer Meeting, 2013. This is the first study which prospectively evaluates patients who underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty with the INBONE prosthesis. Implant survival was 94% at a mean of 3.7 years; however, 10% of patients required reoperation during the study period.Google Scholar
- 19.• Schweitzer KM, Adams SB, Viens NA, Queen RM, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, et al. Early prospective clinical results of a modern fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1002–11. This is the first prospective study evaluating patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty using the Salto-Talaris fixed-bearing implant available in the U.S. Implant survival was 96% at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. All patients were noted to have significant improvement in pain and patient-reported outcome and functional scores.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.•• Nunley JA, Caputo AM, Easley ME, Cook C. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR Total Ankle Replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:43–8. This study was the first to evaluate patient self-reported improvements in quality of life and function. Patients underwent a STAR total ankle replacement and were found to have significant improvement in pain, function, and quality of life at 5-year follow-up.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.•• Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E. STAR ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:S473–84. This is a study on the long-term survivorship of the STAR prosthesis, the only mobile-bearing total ankle approved for use in the U.S. The authors reported a 91% implant survivorship at an average of 9.1 years postoperatively, and 92% of patients were satisfied with their outcome.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.• Brunner S, Barg A, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Kapron AL, Valderrabano V, et al. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: long-term, eleven to fifteen-year, survivorship analysis of the prosthesis in seventy-two consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:711–8. This study from a group in Switzerland reported their long-term results with the STAR prosthesis. In their study, they noted implant survival to be 70.7% at 10 years and 45.6% at 14 years.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Bobyn JD, Hacking SA, Chan SP. Characterization of new porous tantalum biomaterial for reconstructive orthopaedics. AAOS Annual Meeting. 1999.Google Scholar