Design rationale for customized TKA: a new idea or revisiting the past?
- 272 Downloads
Today’s most basic and important total knee replacement design concepts arose out of an earlier era in which 2 distinct approaches emerged, functional and anatomic. Functional approaches simplified knee kinetics, were easier to implant, and gained widespread popularity, in part, from their inventory control. Anatomic approaches were an attempt to recreate normal knee motion with low prosthetic contact stress. Historically, however, they became impractical to produce because of the cost of maintaining a wide variety of anatomic knee implants. New customized designs may return the anatomic design to favor due to several key features that borrow anatomic principles developed in the past, and improved with new ideas.
KeywordsTotal knee Anatomic Functional Customized Design
EM Schwechter: none; W. Fitz: Member of scientific advisory board, consultancy, patents, stock/stock options, and receives royalties from Conformis, Inc.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • of importance
- 1.Ranawat CS, Shine JJ. Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;185–95.Google Scholar
- 2.Walker PS, Wang C-J, Masse Y. Joint laxity as a criterion for the design of condylar knee prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 1974;CP16:22.Google Scholar
- 5.Murray DG JHS, Inventor. Knee joint prosthesis. US patent 4,016,606. April 12, 1977, 1977.Google Scholar
- 6.Goodfellow JW JJS, Nigel G. Inventor. Prosthetic joint device. US patent 4,085,466. April 25, 1978. 1978.Google Scholar
- 8.Townley CO. Total knee arthroplasty, a personal retrospective and prospective review. Clin Orthop. 1988;236:8.Google Scholar
- 11.Ewald FC Inventor. Joint Protheses. US patent 3,798,6791971.Google Scholar
- 14.Sell D. Legal tussle in market for medical devices. The Inquirer. April 5, 2012. 2012.Google Scholar
- 19.• Hunter DJ, Niu J, Felson DT, Harvey WF, Gross KD, McCree P, et al. Knee alignment does not predict incident osteoarthritis: the Framingham osteoarthritis study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1212–8. Describes the distal femoral condylar angle, which explains why symmetric off-the-shelf knee designs don't fit. Also describes the tibial varus angle to justify an asymmetric higher lateral insert which cannot be achieved using symmetric off-the-shelf knee designs.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.• Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F. The anatomical tibial axis: reliable rotational orientation in knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(8):1032–8. Describes the center of medial and lateral tibial plateau which is the method the tibia tray is designed given the high variability of the medial tibial tubercle.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.• Lawrie CM, Noble PC, Ismaily SK, Stal D, Incavo SJ. The flexion-extension axis of the knee and its relationship to the rotational orientation of the tibial plateau. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(6 Suppl)):53–8. Explains why surgeons should be careful using the tibial tubercle for tibial component rotation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Slamin J, Ketelhon, R. Bojarski, R., Parsley, B. Optimizing Knee Femoral Component Strength and Bone Preservation with Finite Element Analysis. Proceedings of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 02/042012–02/07/2012, 2012; San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar