Humeral shaft fractures
- 523 Downloads
Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.
KeywordsHumeral shaft Fracture Anatomy Functional bracing Nonunion Surgical approaches Operative management Plate fixation Intramedullary nail Trauma Musculoskeletal
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 2.Templeman DC, Sims SA. Humeral shaft fractures. In: Stannard JP, Schmidt AH, Kregor PJ, editors. Surgical treatment of orthopaedic trauma. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2007. p. 263–84.Google Scholar
- 10.• Denard Jr A, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, et al. Outcomes of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33:552. Recent retrospective study comparing functional bracing with compression plating. Higher rates of nonunions and malunions with functional bracing and no significant difference in complications from operative intervention.Google Scholar
- 22.• Singisetti K, Ambedkar M. Nailing versus plating in humeral shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2010;34:571–6. Prospective evaluation of twenty patients with antegrade nails and sixteen patients with dynamic compression plates over a three year period and used functional scoring criteria. Paper noted that treatment should be individualized to patients.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.• Suzuki T, Hak DJ, Stahel PF, et al. Safety and efficacy of conversion from external fixation to plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:414–9. Seventeen patients treated with acute external fixators for severe injury were converted to plate fixation at any average of 6.2 days (range 2–14 days) with good outcomes. Conversion within two weeks is safe and effective.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.• Patel R, Neu CP, Curtiss S, et al. Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;5:300–5. 3.5 mm plates were compared to 4.5 mm plates in biomechanical testing in length unstable humeri using similar working lengths and number of fixation points. 4.5 mm plates were stronger and better tolerated crutch weight-bearing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.• Kobayashi M, Watanabe Y, Matsushita T. Early full range of shoulder and elbow motion is possible after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:212–6. Fourteen patients treated by a single surgeon with minimally invasive surgical osteosynthesis (MIPO) demonstrated early recovery of motion of adjacent joints.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:407–14.Google Scholar
- 39.Rommens PM, Kuechle R, Bord T, et al. Humeral nailing revisited. Injury Int J Care Injured. 2008;39:1319–28.Google Scholar
- 40.Noda M, Saegusa Y, Maeda T. Does the location of the entry point affect the reduction of proximal humeral fractures? A cadaveric study. Injury Int J Care Injured. 2011;42:S35–8.Google Scholar
- 42.McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, editors. Rockwood and Green’s: fractures in adults. 6th ed. Philadelpha: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1117–59.Google Scholar
- 44.Iacobellis C, Agro T, Aldegheri R. Locked antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0166-z.
- 46.Hollister AM, Saulsbery C, Odom JL, et al. New technique for humeral shaft fracture retrograde intramedullary nailing. Tech Hand Surg. 2011;15:138–43.Google Scholar
- 48.• Heineman DJ, Poolman RW, Nork SE, et al. Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:216–23. Meta-analysis of four randomized trials comparing humeral intramedullary nailing to plate fixation. They noted no statistically significant difference in total complications, nonunion, infection, nerve palsy, and reoperation.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.• Denes E, Nus S, Sermon A, et al. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:735–42. Forty-two humeral plates were compared to forty-nine nails with no difference noted in fracture union and functional recovery.Google Scholar