Advertisement

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 177–183 | Cite as

Humeral shaft fractures

  • Andre R. Spiguel
  • Robert J. Steffner
Trauma (MJ Gardner, Section Editor)

Abstract

Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.

Keywords

Humeral shaft Fracture Anatomy Functional bracing Nonunion Surgical approaches Operative management Plate fixation Intramedullary nail Trauma Musculoskeletal 

Notes

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Cole PA, Wijdicks CA. The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23:437–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Templeman DC, Sims SA. Humeral shaft fractures. In: Stannard JP, Schmidt AH, Kregor PJ, editors. Surgical treatment of orthopaedic trauma. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2007. p. 263–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, et al. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1469–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;802:249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brorson S. Management of fractures of the humerus in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome: an historical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1907–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E, et al. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:596–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA, et al. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:607–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, et al. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:478–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rutgers M, Ring D. Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:597–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    • Denard Jr A, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, et al. Outcomes of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33:552. Recent retrospective study comparing functional bracing with compression plating. Higher rates of nonunions and malunions with functional bracing and no significant difference in complications from operative intervention.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Idoine 3rd JD, French BG, Opalek JM, et al. Plating of acute humeral diaphyseal fractures through an anterior approach in multiple trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:9–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, et al. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:833–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zlotolow DA, Catalano 3rd LW, Barron OA, et al. Surgical exposures of the humerus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:754–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klenerman L. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48:105–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C. The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:143–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fjalestad T, Stromsoe K, Salvesen P, et al. Functional results of braced humeral diaphyseal fractures: why do 38 % lose external rotation of the shoulder? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:281–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ, et al. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 2005;29:10–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:283–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, et al. Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2343–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerwin M, Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJ. Alternative operative exposures of the posterior aspect of the humeral diaphysis with reference to the radial nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1690–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mills WJ, Hanel DP, Smith DG. Lateral approach to the humeral shaft: an alternative approach for fracture treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:81–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    • Singisetti K, Ambedkar M. Nailing versus plating in humeral shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2010;34:571–6. Prospective evaluation of twenty patients with antegrade nails and sixteen patients with dynamic compression plates over a three year period and used functional scoring criteria. Paper noted that treatment should be individualized to patients.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    • Suzuki T, Hak DJ, Stahel PF, et al. Safety and efficacy of conversion from external fixation to plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:414–9. Seventeen patients treated with acute external fixators for severe injury were converted to plate fixation at any average of 6.2 days (range 2–14 days) with good outcomes. Conversion within two weeks is safe and effective.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marsh JL, Mahoney CR, Steinbronn D. External fixation of open humerus fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 1999;19:35–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mostafavi HR, Tornetta III P. Open fractures of the humerus treated with external fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:187–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zinman C, Norman D, Hamoud K, et al. External fixation for severe open fractures of the humerus caused by missles. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:536–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clement H, Pichler W, Tesch NP, et al. Anatomical basis of the risk of radial nerve injury related to the technique of external fixation applied to the distal humerus. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:221–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, et al. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures – a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:279–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, et al. Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:531–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Patel R, Neu CP, Curtiss S, et al. Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;5:300–5. 3.5 mm plates were compared to 4.5 mm plates in biomechanical testing in length unstable humeri using similar working lengths and number of fixation points. 4.5 mm plates were stronger and better tolerated crutch weight-bearing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prasarn ML, Ahn J, Paul O, et al. Dual plating for fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:57–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hornicek FJ, Zych GA, Hutson JJ, et al. Salvage of humeral nonunions with onlay bone plate allograft augmentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;386:203–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Concha JM, Sandoval A, Streubel RN. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible? Int Orthop. 2010;34:1297–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    • Kobayashi M, Watanabe Y, Matsushita T. Early full range of shoulder and elbow motion is possible after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:212–6. Fourteen patients treated by a single surgeon with minimally invasive surgical osteosynthesis (MIPO) demonstrated early recovery of motion of adjacent joints.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ziquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, et al. Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:628–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ekholm R, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, et al. Primary radial nerve palsy in patients with acute humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:408–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hughes R, Schneeberger A, An K, et al. Reduction of triceps muscle force after shortening of the distal humerus: a computational model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;6:444–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:407–14.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rommens PM, Kuechle R, Bord T, et al. Humeral nailing revisited. Injury Int J Care Injured. 2008;39:1319–28.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Noda M, Saegusa Y, Maeda T. Does the location of the entry point affect the reduction of proximal humeral fractures? A cadaveric study. Injury Int J Care Injured. 2011;42:S35–8.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, et al. Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:195–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, editors. Rockwood and Green’s: fractures in adults. 6th ed. Philadelpha: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1117–59.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsourvakas S, Alexandropoulos C, Papachristos I, et al. Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nail. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011;95:193–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Iacobellis C, Agro T, Aldegheri R. Locked antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0166-z.
  45. 45.
    Blum J, Rommens PM, Janzing H, et al. Retrograde nailing of humerus shaft fractures with the unreamed humerus nail. An International Multicenter Study. Unfallchirurg. 1998;101:342–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hollister AM, Saulsbery C, Odom JL, et al. New technique for humeral shaft fracture retrograde intramedullary nailing. Tech Hand Surg. 2011;15:138–43.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Heineman DJ, Bhandari M, Nork SE, et al. Treatment of humeral shaft fractures – meta-analysis reupdated. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    • Heineman DJ, Poolman RW, Nork SE, et al. Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:216–23. Meta-analysis of four randomized trials comparing humeral intramedullary nailing to plate fixation. They noted no statistically significant difference in total complications, nonunion, infection, nerve palsy, and reoperation.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    • Denes E, Nus S, Sermon A, et al. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:735–42. Forty-two humeral plates were compared to forty-nine nails with no difference noted in fracture union and functional recovery.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Flury MP, Goldhahn J, Holzmann P, et al. Does Weber’s rotation osteotomy induce degenerative joint disease at the shoulder in the long-term. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:735–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Chicago Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  2. 2.University of California – Davis Medical Center, Ellison Ambulatory Care CenterSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations