Advertisement

The layer concept: utilization in determining the pain generators, pathology and how structure determines treatment

  • Peter DraovitchEmail author
  • Jaime Edelstein
  • Bryan T. Kelly
Hip Rehabilitation (J Edelstein, Section Editor)

Abstract

The level of understanding of pain in the non-arthritic hip has made significant strides in the last couple of decades beginning with the discoveries of Reinhold Ganz, MD. However, even with the detection of subtle bony abnormalities, including femoroacetabular impingement, a clinician’s ability to differentiate pain generators in the hip has been ambiguous. Deciphering the etiology of the pathology versus the pain generator is essential in prescribing the proper treatment. The Layer Concept developed by Dr. Bryan Kelly, is a systematic means of determining which structures about the hip are the source of the pathology, which are the pain generators and how to then best implement treatment. Four layers will be discussed in this article. Layer I, the osseous layer, Layer II, the inert tissue layer, Layer III, the contractile layer and Layer IV, the neuromechanical layer.

Keywords

Femoroacetabular impingement Hip arthroscopy Bony pathology Capsular laxity Neuromuscular control 

Notes

Disclosure

P. Draovitch: none; J. Edelstein: none; B. Kelly: consultant for Pivot medical, Smith and Nephew, and A2 Surgical; stock/stock options with Pivot Medical and A2 Surgical.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Jones R: Cheilectomy of head of femur in house painter. British Orthopedic Association Symposium on Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Hip, 1920.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith-Petersen MN. Treatment of malum coxae, senilis, old slipped upper femoral epiphysis, intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabulum, and coxa plana by means of acetabuloplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1936;18:869–80.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heyman CH. Treatment of slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949;89:559–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Brit J Radiol. 1965;38:810–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Stulberg SD, Harris WH: Acetabular dysplasia and development of osteoarthritis of the hip. In The Hip. Proceedings of the Second Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby, 1974, 82.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solomon L. Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58-B:176–83.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al.: Femoroacetabular Impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis for the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 417:111-119. The importance of this article was that it introduced the concept of a non- dysplastic hip as a possible cause for early onset hip arthritis. Abnormal articular hip mechanics and forces may exist for those people presenting with FAI hip structure characteristics. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ganz R, Leunig M, Ganz KL, et al. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel K, Wallace R, Busconi B. Radiolology. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30:239–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bittersohl B, Hosalker H, Apprich S, et al. Comparison of pre-operative dGEMRIC imaging with intra-operative findings in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:553–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog R. Evaluation of a computed tomography-based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(4):382–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grissom L, Harcke HT, Thacker M. Imaging in the surgical management of developmental dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:791–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Sekiya JK. The diagnostic accuracy of a clinical examination in determining intra-articular hip pain for potential hip arthroscopy candidates. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1013–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M, et al. Static and dynamic causes of mechanical hip pain. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:235–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eckstein F, Merz B, Schmid P, et al. The influence of geometry on the stress distribution in joints – a finite element analysis. Anat Embryol. 1994;189:545–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurrat HJ, Oberlander W. The thickness of the cartilage in the hip joint. J Anat. 1978;126(part 1):145–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R. An in vitro investigation of acetabular labral seal in hip. J Biomech. 2003;36:171–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crawford MJ, Dy CJ, Alexander JW. The 2007 Frank Stinchfield award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:16–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R. The acetabular labrum seal: a poroelastic finite element model. Clin Biomech. 2000;15:463–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menschik F. The hip joint as a conchoids shape. J Biomech. 1997;30:971–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saffran MR, Zaffagnini S, Lopomo L: The influence of soft tissues on hip joint kinematics: an in vitro computer assisted analysis. Orthopedic Research Society 55th Annual Meeting. Las Vegas, NV. February 22-25, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Akiyama K, Sakai T, Koyanagi J, et al. Evaluation of translation in the normal and dysplastic hip using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based registration. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2011;19:700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hewitt J, Guilak F, Glisson R, et al. Regional material properties of the human hip joint capsule ligaments. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(3):359–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henak CR, Ellis BJ, Harris MD, et al. Role of acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint. J Biomech. 2011;44:2201–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Safran MR, Giordano G, Lindsey DP, et al. Strains across the acetabular labrum during hip motion. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:92s–102s.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Philippon MJ. The role of arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy in the hip. Clin Sports Med. 2001;20:817–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith MV, Panchal H, Ruberte Thiel RA, Sekiya JK. Effect of acetabular labrum tears on hipstability and labral strain in a joint compression model. Am J Sport Med. 2011;39:103s–10s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Field RE, Rajakulendran K. The labro-acetabular complex. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Myers CA, Register BC, Lertanwich P, et al. Role of acetabular labrum and the iliofemoral ligament in hip stability. Am J Sport Med. 2011;39:85s–91s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martin RL, Palmer I, Martin HD: Ligamentum teres: a functional description and potential clinical relevance. Knee Surg Sport Tr A accepted September 2011.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Traumatic rupture of the ligamentum teres as a source of pain. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:385–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Allen WC, Cope R. Coxa saltans: the snapping hip revisited. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:303–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    •• Babst D,Steppacher SD, Ganz R et al.: The iliocapsularis muscle; an important stabilizer in the dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469: 1728-34. The relevance of this this article is that it clearly demonstrates that patients presenting with dysplastic hips are likely to develop compensatory coverage. This also demonstrates the significance of the relationships and inter-dependence that exists between the proposed layer systems. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beck M, Sledge JB, Gauteir E, et al. The anatomy and function of the gluteus minimus muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82-B:358–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bunker TD, Essler CN, Leach WJ. Rotator-cuff tear of the hip. J bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:618–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Voos JE, Mauro CS, Kelly BT. Femoroacetabular impingement in the athlete: Compensatory injury patterns. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20:231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ilizaliturri VM, Camacho-Galindo J, Evia Ramirez AN, et al. Soft tissue pathology around the hip. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30:391–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Casartelli NC, Maffiuletti NA, Item-Glatthorn JF, et al. Hip muscle weakness in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2011;19:816–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Green DL, Morris JM. Role of adductor longus and adductor magnus in postural movements and in ambulation. Am J Phys Med. 1970;49:223–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brown SH, Ward SR, Cook MS, et al. Architectural analysis of human abdominal wall muscles. Spine. 2011;36:355–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Page P, Frank C, Lardner R. Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalances: the janda approach. Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2010.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    • Robb AJ, Fleisig G, Wilk K et al. Passive ranges of motion of the hips and their relationship with pitching biomechanics and ball velocity in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med 2010, 38:2487-2493. The significance of this article clearly demonstrates how loss of motion in one joint will adversely affect motion throughout the entire kinetic link. In closed chain activities, which rely on motion and strength from all segments, a person with this structured hip, may predispose themselves to non-contact injury. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ellera Gomes JL, Palma HM, Becker R. Radiographic findings in restrained hip joints associated with ACL rupture. Knee Surg Sports Tr A. 2010;18:1562–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gray H. Ed. Pick TP, Howden R: Gray’s Anatomy. Bounty Books, New York. 1977:568-569.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Netter FH. Atlas of human anatomy. Summit: CIBA- GEIGY Corp; 1993. p. 373–8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kelly BT, Shapiro GS, Digiovanni CW, et al. Vascularity of the hip labrum: A cadaveric investigation. J Arthro Rel Surg. 2005;21(1):3–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Freeman MA, Wyke B. Articular reflexes at the ankle joint: an electromyographic study of normal and abnormal influences of ankle-joint mechanoreceptors upon reflex activity in the leg muscles. Mr J Surg. 1967;54:990–1001.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sarban S, Baba F, Kocabey Y, et al. Free nerve endings and morphological features of the ligamentum capitis femoris in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Ped Orthop. 2007;16(5):351–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kennedy JC, Alexander IJ, Hayes KC. Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:329–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dee R. Structure and function of hip joint innervation. Middlesex Hospital, London: Demonstration delivered at Royal College of Surgeons of England; 1969.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Muralti HH, Bicimoglu A, Tabak YS, et al. Mechanoreceptor evaluation of hip joint capsule and ligamentum capitis femoris in developmental hip dysplasia: a preliminary study. J Ped Orthop. 2004;13(5):299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Leunig M, Beck M, Stauffer E, et al. Free nerve endings in the ligamentum capitis femoris. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:452–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kurtz AD. Chronic sprained ankle. Am J Surg. 1939;44:158–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zazulak BT, Cholewicki J, Reeves NP. Neuromuscular control of trunk stability: clinical implications for sports injury prevention. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:497–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zazulak BT, Hewett TE, Reeves NP, et al. The effect of core proprioception on knee injury. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):368–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zazulak BT, Hewett TE, Reeves NP, et al. Deficit in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1123–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zazulak BT, Hewett TE, Reeves NP, et al. Deficit in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1123–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb. Phys Ther. 1997;77(2):132–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cholewicki J, et al. Neuromuscular function in athletes following recovery from a recent acute low back injury. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(11):568–75.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bullock-Saxton JE, Janda V, Bullock MI. The influence of ankle sprain injury on muscle activation during hip extension. J Sports Med. 1994;15:330–4.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Greene HS, Cholewicki J, Galloway MT, et al. A history of low back injury is a risk factor for recurrent back injuries in varsity athletes. Amer J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):795–800.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ong A, Anderson J, Roche J. A pilot study of the prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration in elite athletes with lower back pain at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(3):263–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spine Disorders. 1992;5(4):383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Grant JC. An atlas of anatomy. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co; 1947. p. 180–4.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sherrington CS. The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale University; 1906.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Draovitch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jaime Edelstein
    • 1
  • Bryan T. Kelly
    • 2
  1. 1.Hospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Hospital for Special SurgeryCenter for Hip PreservationNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations