Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports
- 360 Downloads
Because of the extensile nature and familiarity of the standard posterior-lateral approach to the hip, a family of “micro-posterior” approaches has been developed. This family includes the Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (PATH) approach, the Supercapsular (SuperCap) approach and a newer hybrid approach, the Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) approach. Such approaches should ideally provide a continuum for the surgeon: from a “micro” (external rotator sparing) posterior approach, to a “mini” (external rotator sacrificing) posterior approach, to a standard posterior approach. This could keep a surgeon within his comfort zone during the learning curve of the procedure, while leaving options for complicated reconstructions for the more practiced micro-posterior surgeons. This paper details one author’s experiences utilizing this combined approach, as well as permutations of this entire micro-posterior family of approaches as applied to more complex hip reconstructions.
KeywordsSuperPATH PATH SuperCap Micro-superior Hip Total Arthroplasty Minimally-invasive Micro-posterior Micro-invasive Replacement Percutaneous Assisted Direct-posterior Direct
J. Chow: consultant to Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Smith & Nephew; B. Penenberg: patents and royalties from Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; S. Murphy: Consultant to Ceramtec, GmbH; patents and royalties from Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; holds stock/stock options in Surgical Planning Associates, Inc.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, Mandereau C, Brzakala V, Dujardin F. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(1):14–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC, Hildebrand M, Berli MC, Walker MR, et al. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches–a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech. 2011;44(3):372–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.••Murphy SB. Tissue-Preserving, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a superior capsulotomy. In: Hozack W, editor. Minimally invasive total hip and knee arthroplaty. Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 101–107. Detailed description of the SuperCap technique and clinical rationale. Google Scholar
- 27.••Murphy SB, Tannast M. Conventional vs minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of rehabilitation and complications. Orthopäde. 2006;(35):761-8. This article is in German with an abstract in English. Google Scholar
- 29.••Chow J, Kurtz W, Chadha B, Penenberg B, Murphy S. Paper #353: modified superior approach for THA with percutaneous assistance: technique and early results. AAOS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA. February 15–19, 2011. This paper outlines the SuperPATH technique step-by-step and provides a detailed analysis of a single surgeon’s experience through the learning curve of the technique. Google Scholar